谨慎行事还是在危险中取胜?企业对经济政策不确定性的认知与绿色技术创新

IF 5.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Asia Pacific Journal of Management Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s10490-023-09944-y
Yanmin Shao, Kunliang Xu
{"title":"谨慎行事还是在危险中取胜?企业对经济政策不确定性的认知与绿色技术创新","authors":"Yanmin Shao,&nbsp;Kunliang Xu","doi":"10.1007/s10490-023-09944-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Synthesising insights from threat-rigidity theory, this study explores the impact of firms’ economic policy uncertainty (EPU) perceptions on their green technology innovation (GTI) performance. By regarding EPU as an individualised perception rather than the homogeneous and macro factor in previous studies, we theorise that an increase in EPU perception will trigger a threat-rigidity effect and drive the firm to avoid participating in GTI activities featured by technological and environmental externalities. Furthermore, we find that environmental governance performance and state ownership can mitigate the threat-rigidity effect of EPU perception on GTI. Using a sample of Chinese listed manufacturing firms during 2011–2021, this study measures firms’ EPU perceptions at the micro level based on textual analysis of Management Discussion and Analysis texts, and draws evidence in support of the arguments. These findings provide significant insights for executives and government agencies to govern firms’ GTI when perceiving a turbulent economic policy environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8474,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","volume":"42 3","pages":"1163 - 1195"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Be cautious or win in danger? Firms’ economic policy uncertainty perception and green technology innovation\",\"authors\":\"Yanmin Shao,&nbsp;Kunliang Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10490-023-09944-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Synthesising insights from threat-rigidity theory, this study explores the impact of firms’ economic policy uncertainty (EPU) perceptions on their green technology innovation (GTI) performance. By regarding EPU as an individualised perception rather than the homogeneous and macro factor in previous studies, we theorise that an increase in EPU perception will trigger a threat-rigidity effect and drive the firm to avoid participating in GTI activities featured by technological and environmental externalities. Furthermore, we find that environmental governance performance and state ownership can mitigate the threat-rigidity effect of EPU perception on GTI. Using a sample of Chinese listed manufacturing firms during 2011–2021, this study measures firms’ EPU perceptions at the micro level based on textual analysis of Management Discussion and Analysis texts, and draws evidence in support of the arguments. These findings provide significant insights for executives and government agencies to govern firms’ GTI when perceiving a turbulent economic policy environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"1163 - 1195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10490-023-09944-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10490-023-09944-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究综合了威胁-刚性理论的见解,探讨了企业经济政策不确定性(EPU)感知对其绿色技术创新(GTI)绩效的影响。通过将EPU视为一种个性化感知,而不是以往研究中的同质和宏观因素,我们推断EPU感知的增加将触发威胁-刚性效应,并促使企业避免参与具有技术和环境外部性的GTI活动。此外,我们发现环境治理绩效和国家所有权可以缓解环境单位感知对GTI的威胁-刚性效应。本研究以2011-2021年中国制造业上市公司为样本,基于对《管理讨论与分析》文本的分析,从微观层面衡量了企业的EPU认知,并为本文的论点提供了证据支持。这些发现为管理人员和政府机构在感知动荡的经济政策环境时管理公司的GTI提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Be cautious or win in danger? Firms’ economic policy uncertainty perception and green technology innovation

Synthesising insights from threat-rigidity theory, this study explores the impact of firms’ economic policy uncertainty (EPU) perceptions on their green technology innovation (GTI) performance. By regarding EPU as an individualised perception rather than the homogeneous and macro factor in previous studies, we theorise that an increase in EPU perception will trigger a threat-rigidity effect and drive the firm to avoid participating in GTI activities featured by technological and environmental externalities. Furthermore, we find that environmental governance performance and state ownership can mitigate the threat-rigidity effect of EPU perception on GTI. Using a sample of Chinese listed manufacturing firms during 2011–2021, this study measures firms’ EPU perceptions at the micro level based on textual analysis of Management Discussion and Analysis texts, and draws evidence in support of the arguments. These findings provide significant insights for executives and government agencies to govern firms’ GTI when perceiving a turbulent economic policy environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Management publishes original manuscripts on management and organizational research in the Asia Pacific region, encompassing Pacific Rim countries and mainland Asia. APJM focuses on the extent to which each manuscript addresses matters that pertain to the most fundamental question: “What determines organization success?” The major academic disciplines that we cover include entrepreneurship, human resource management, international business, organizational behavior, and strategic management. However, manuscripts that belong to other well-established disciplines such as accounting, economics, finance, marketing, and operations generally do not fall into the scope of APJM. We endeavor to be the major vehicle for exchange of ideas and research among management scholars within or interested in the broadly defined Asia Pacific region.Key features include: Rigor - maintained through strict review processes, high quality global reviewers, and Editorial Advisory and Review Boards comprising prominent researchers from many countries. Relevance - maintained by its focus on key management and organizational trends in the region. Uniqueness - being the first and most prominent management journal published in and about the fastest growing region in the world. Official affiliation - Asia Academy of ManagementFor more information, visit the AAOM website:www.baf.cuhk.edu.hk/asia-aom/ Officially cited as: Asia Pac J Manag
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Back to the roots: the homogenization of intra-national differences in societal culture and preferred managerial leader behaviors in China The influence of innovation performance deficit and CSR as a nonmarket strategy: The contingent role of competitive strategy Overwhelmed by expectations? Exploring the curvilinear effects of leaders’ creativity expectations? A from-the-top view of strategic flexibility: a study of CEO social class, TMT regulatory focus, and environment uncertainty Feeling proud but losing control: investigating Supervisor’s responses toward subordinate bootlegging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1