Nouf A Mushari, G. Soultanidis, Lisa Duff, M. Trivieri, Z. Fayad, Philip Robson, C. Tsoumpas
{"title":"评估正电子发射计算机断层显像和计算机断层显像放射学特征以检测心脏肉瘤病","authors":"Nouf A Mushari, G. Soultanidis, Lisa Duff, M. Trivieri, Z. Fayad, Philip Robson, C. Tsoumpas","doi":"10.3389/fnume.2024.1324698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual interpretation of PET and CMR may fail to identify cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with high specificity. This study aimed to evaluate the role of [18F]FDG PET and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-CMR radiomic features in differentiating CS from another cause of myocardial inflammation, in this case patients with cardiac-related clinical symptoms following COVID-19.[18F]FDG PET and LGE-CMR were treated separately in this work. There were thirty-five post-COVID-19 (PC) and forty CS datasets. Regions of interest were delineated manually around the entire left ventricle for PET and LGE-CMR datasets. Radiomic features were then extracted. The ability of individual features to correctly identify image data as CS or PC was tested to predict clinical classification of CS vs. PC using Mann–Whitney U-tests and logistic regression. Features were retained if P-value <0.00053, AUC >0.5 and accuracy >0.7. After applying correlation test, uncorrelated features were used as a signature (joint features) to train machine learning classifiers. For LGE-CMR analysis, to further improve the results, different classifiers were used for individual features besides logistic regression and the results of individual features of each classifier were screened to create a signature that include all features that followed the previously mentioned criteria and use them as input for machine learning classifiers.The Mann–Whitney U-tests and logistic regression were trained on individual features to build a collection of features. For [18F]FDG PET analysis, the maximum target-to-background ratio (TBRmax) showed high area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy with small P-values (<0.00053) but the signature performed better (AUC 0.98 and accuracy 0.91). For LGE-CMR analysis, Gray Level Dependence Matrix (gldm)-Dependence Non-Uniformity showed good results with small error bars (accuracy 0.75 and AUC 0.87). However, by applying a Support Vector Machine classifier on individual LGE-CMR features and creating a signature, a Random Forest classifier displayed better AUC and accuracy (0.91 and 0.84, respectively).Using radiomic features may prove useful in identifying individuals with CS. Some features showed promising results to differentiate between PC and CS. By automating the analysis, the patient management process can be accelerated and improved.","PeriodicalId":505895,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine","volume":"54 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of PET and CMR radiomic features for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis\",\"authors\":\"Nouf A Mushari, G. Soultanidis, Lisa Duff, M. Trivieri, Z. Fayad, Philip Robson, C. Tsoumpas\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnume.2024.1324698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Visual interpretation of PET and CMR may fail to identify cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with high specificity. This study aimed to evaluate the role of [18F]FDG PET and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-CMR radiomic features in differentiating CS from another cause of myocardial inflammation, in this case patients with cardiac-related clinical symptoms following COVID-19.[18F]FDG PET and LGE-CMR were treated separately in this work. There were thirty-five post-COVID-19 (PC) and forty CS datasets. Regions of interest were delineated manually around the entire left ventricle for PET and LGE-CMR datasets. Radiomic features were then extracted. The ability of individual features to correctly identify image data as CS or PC was tested to predict clinical classification of CS vs. PC using Mann–Whitney U-tests and logistic regression. Features were retained if P-value <0.00053, AUC >0.5 and accuracy >0.7. After applying correlation test, uncorrelated features were used as a signature (joint features) to train machine learning classifiers. For LGE-CMR analysis, to further improve the results, different classifiers were used for individual features besides logistic regression and the results of individual features of each classifier were screened to create a signature that include all features that followed the previously mentioned criteria and use them as input for machine learning classifiers.The Mann–Whitney U-tests and logistic regression were trained on individual features to build a collection of features. For [18F]FDG PET analysis, the maximum target-to-background ratio (TBRmax) showed high area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy with small P-values (<0.00053) but the signature performed better (AUC 0.98 and accuracy 0.91). For LGE-CMR analysis, Gray Level Dependence Matrix (gldm)-Dependence Non-Uniformity showed good results with small error bars (accuracy 0.75 and AUC 0.87). However, by applying a Support Vector Machine classifier on individual LGE-CMR features and creating a signature, a Random Forest classifier displayed better AUC and accuracy (0.91 and 0.84, respectively).Using radiomic features may prove useful in identifying individuals with CS. Some features showed promising results to differentiate between PC and CS. By automating the analysis, the patient management process can be accelerated and improved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\"54 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2024.1324698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2024.1324698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
正电子发射计算机断层显像(PET)和计算机断层显像(CMR)的肉眼判读可能无法高特异性地识别心脏肉样瘤病(CS)。本研究旨在评估[18F]FDG正电子发射计算机断层显像和晚期钆增强(LGE)-CMR放射学特征在区分CS和其他心肌炎症病因方面的作用,在本病例中,COVID-19后出现心脏相关临床症状的患者。共有 35 个 COVID-19 后(PC)数据集和 40 个 CS 数据集。PET 和 LGE-CMR 数据集的感兴趣区均围绕整个左心室手工划定。然后提取放射学特征。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和逻辑回归法测试各个特征正确识别图像数据为 CS 或 PC 的能力,以预测 CS 与 PC 的临床分类。如果 P 值为 0.5 且准确率大于 0.7,则保留特征。应用相关性检验后,不相关的特征被用作训练机器学习分类器的特征(联合特征)。对于 LGE-CMR 分析,为了进一步改善结果,除了逻辑回归外,还对单个特征使用了不同的分类器,并对每个分类器的单个特征结果进行筛选,以创建一个包含所有符合前述标准的特征的签名,并将其作为机器学习分类器的输入。对于[18F]FDG PET 分析,最大靶-背景比(TBRmax)显示出较高的曲线下面积(AUC)和准确率,P 值很小(<0.00053),但特征表现更好(AUC 0.98,准确率 0.91)。对于 LGE-CMR 分析,灰度依赖性矩阵(gldm)-依赖性不均匀性显示出良好的结果,误差小(准确率为 0.75,AUC 为 0.87)。然而,通过对单个 LGE-CMR 特征应用支持向量机分类器并创建特征,随机森林分类器显示出更好的 AUC 和准确率(分别为 0.91 和 0.84)。一些特征在区分 PC 和 CS 方面显示出良好的效果。通过自动化分析,可以加快和改善患者管理流程。
An assessment of PET and CMR radiomic features for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis
Visual interpretation of PET and CMR may fail to identify cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with high specificity. This study aimed to evaluate the role of [18F]FDG PET and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-CMR radiomic features in differentiating CS from another cause of myocardial inflammation, in this case patients with cardiac-related clinical symptoms following COVID-19.[18F]FDG PET and LGE-CMR were treated separately in this work. There were thirty-five post-COVID-19 (PC) and forty CS datasets. Regions of interest were delineated manually around the entire left ventricle for PET and LGE-CMR datasets. Radiomic features were then extracted. The ability of individual features to correctly identify image data as CS or PC was tested to predict clinical classification of CS vs. PC using Mann–Whitney U-tests and logistic regression. Features were retained if P-value <0.00053, AUC >0.5 and accuracy >0.7. After applying correlation test, uncorrelated features were used as a signature (joint features) to train machine learning classifiers. For LGE-CMR analysis, to further improve the results, different classifiers were used for individual features besides logistic regression and the results of individual features of each classifier were screened to create a signature that include all features that followed the previously mentioned criteria and use them as input for machine learning classifiers.The Mann–Whitney U-tests and logistic regression were trained on individual features to build a collection of features. For [18F]FDG PET analysis, the maximum target-to-background ratio (TBRmax) showed high area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy with small P-values (<0.00053) but the signature performed better (AUC 0.98 and accuracy 0.91). For LGE-CMR analysis, Gray Level Dependence Matrix (gldm)-Dependence Non-Uniformity showed good results with small error bars (accuracy 0.75 and AUC 0.87). However, by applying a Support Vector Machine classifier on individual LGE-CMR features and creating a signature, a Random Forest classifier displayed better AUC and accuracy (0.91 and 0.84, respectively).Using radiomic features may prove useful in identifying individuals with CS. Some features showed promising results to differentiate between PC and CS. By automating the analysis, the patient management process can be accelerated and improved.