通过探究基础假设为学生的基础学习做好准备:批判性思维框架

IF 1 3区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Sociology Pub Date : 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1177/0092055x231222276
S. Applin
{"title":"通过探究基础假设为学生的基础学习做好准备:批判性思维框架","authors":"S. Applin","doi":"10.1177/0092055x231222276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students hold foundational assumptions that interact with information they are introduced to in college. By learning to identify, assess, and restructure these foundational ideas, students’ ability to acquire topical knowledge improves. This article presents a format for teaching students how to evaluate their beliefs through four levels of critical thinking: (1) identifying assumptions, (2) assessing the origin and quality of assumptions, (3) seeking out alternative perspectives, and (4) weighing evidence and incorporating new information into thinking. A variety of skills are needed to accomplish each of these levels, such as identifying biases and developing intellectual humility. Self-assessments, assignments, and responses to early and late semester questionnaires suggest students see the value in learning about critical thinking and develop their ability to think critically over the course of the semester. Students become more open-minded, intellectually humble, and self-reflective, priming them to be more receptive to foundational learning.","PeriodicalId":46942,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priming Students for Foundational Learning by Investigating Foundational Assumptions: A Critical Thinking Framework\",\"authors\":\"S. Applin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0092055x231222276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Students hold foundational assumptions that interact with information they are introduced to in college. By learning to identify, assess, and restructure these foundational ideas, students’ ability to acquire topical knowledge improves. This article presents a format for teaching students how to evaluate their beliefs through four levels of critical thinking: (1) identifying assumptions, (2) assessing the origin and quality of assumptions, (3) seeking out alternative perspectives, and (4) weighing evidence and incorporating new information into thinking. A variety of skills are needed to accomplish each of these levels, such as identifying biases and developing intellectual humility. Self-assessments, assignments, and responses to early and late semester questionnaires suggest students see the value in learning about critical thinking and develop their ability to think critically over the course of the semester. Students become more open-minded, intellectually humble, and self-reflective, priming them to be more receptive to foundational learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x231222276\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x231222276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生持有的基础性假设与他们在大学中接触到的信息相互影响。通过学习识别、评估和重组这些基础观念,学生获取专题知识的能力就会得到提高。本文介绍了一种通过四个层次的批判性思维教授学生如何评估其信念的方法:(1) 识别假设,(2) 评估假设的来源和质量,(3) 寻求其他观点,(4) 权衡证据并将新信息纳入思考。要达到上述各层次的要求,需要掌握各种技能,如识别偏见和培养智力上的谦逊。自我评估、作业以及对学期初和学期末调查问卷的答复表明,学生看到了学习批判性思维的价值,并在本学期发展了他们的批判性思维能力。学生的思维变得更加开阔,在智力上更加谦虚,更加善于自我反思,从而更容易接受基础学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Priming Students for Foundational Learning by Investigating Foundational Assumptions: A Critical Thinking Framework
Students hold foundational assumptions that interact with information they are introduced to in college. By learning to identify, assess, and restructure these foundational ideas, students’ ability to acquire topical knowledge improves. This article presents a format for teaching students how to evaluate their beliefs through four levels of critical thinking: (1) identifying assumptions, (2) assessing the origin and quality of assumptions, (3) seeking out alternative perspectives, and (4) weighing evidence and incorporating new information into thinking. A variety of skills are needed to accomplish each of these levels, such as identifying biases and developing intellectual humility. Self-assessments, assignments, and responses to early and late semester questionnaires suggest students see the value in learning about critical thinking and develop their ability to think critically over the course of the semester. Students become more open-minded, intellectually humble, and self-reflective, priming them to be more receptive to foundational learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Sociology
Teaching Sociology Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
31.80%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Teaching Sociology (TS) publishes articles, notes, and reviews intended to be helpful to the discipline"s teachers. Articles range from experimental studies of teaching and learning to broad, synthetic essays on pedagogically important issues. Notes focus on specific teaching issues or techniques. The general intent is to share theoretically stimulating and practically useful information and advice with teachers. Formats include full-length articles; notes of 10 pages or less; interviews, review essays; reviews of books, films, videos, and software; and conversations.
期刊最新文献
Whom Benefits? Building a Critical Service-Learning Model Taking Ethnography to Court: Pedagogical Reflections on a Collective Field Study “Out of the Comfort Zone”: Creating a Safely Brave Space for Dialogues about Race New Resources in TRAILS: The Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology Black Lives Matter and the Changing Sociological Canon: An Analysis of Syllabi from 2012 to 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1