关于斯图尔特-高夫平台校准的文献综述

Sourabh Karmakar, Cameron Turner
{"title":"关于斯图尔特-高夫平台校准的文献综述","authors":"Sourabh Karmakar, Cameron Turner","doi":"10.1115/1.4064487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Researchers have studied Stewart platform-based Parallel Kinematic Machines (PKM) extensively for their fine control capabilities, for many applications including medicine, precision engineering machines, aerospace research, electronic chip manufacturing, automobile manufacturing, etc. These applications need micro and nano-level movement control in 3D space for the motions to be precise, complicated, and repeatable; a Stewart platform fulfills these challenges smartly. For this, the PKM must be more accurate than the specified application accuracy level and thus proper calibration for a PKM robot is crucial. Forward kinematics-based calibration for such hexapod machines becomes unnecessarily complex and inverse kinematics complete this task with much ease. To experiment different calibration techniques, various calibration approaches were implemented by using external instruments, constraining one or more motions of the system, and using extra sensors for auto or self-calibration. This survey paid attention to those key methodologies, their outcome, and important details related to inverse kinematic-based PKM calibrations. It was observed during this study that the researchers focused on improving the accuracy of the platform position and orientation considering the errors contributed by one source or multiple sources. The error sources considered are mainly kinematic and structural, in some cases, environmental factors also are reviewed, however, those calibrations are done under no-load conditions. This study aims to review the present state of the art in this field and highlight on the processes and errors considered for the calibration of Stewart platforms.","PeriodicalId":506672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"31 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A LITERATURE REVIEW ON STEWART-GOUGH PLATFORM CALIBRATIONS\",\"authors\":\"Sourabh Karmakar, Cameron Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4064487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Researchers have studied Stewart platform-based Parallel Kinematic Machines (PKM) extensively for their fine control capabilities, for many applications including medicine, precision engineering machines, aerospace research, electronic chip manufacturing, automobile manufacturing, etc. These applications need micro and nano-level movement control in 3D space for the motions to be precise, complicated, and repeatable; a Stewart platform fulfills these challenges smartly. For this, the PKM must be more accurate than the specified application accuracy level and thus proper calibration for a PKM robot is crucial. Forward kinematics-based calibration for such hexapod machines becomes unnecessarily complex and inverse kinematics complete this task with much ease. To experiment different calibration techniques, various calibration approaches were implemented by using external instruments, constraining one or more motions of the system, and using extra sensors for auto or self-calibration. This survey paid attention to those key methodologies, their outcome, and important details related to inverse kinematic-based PKM calibrations. It was observed during this study that the researchers focused on improving the accuracy of the platform position and orientation considering the errors contributed by one source or multiple sources. The error sources considered are mainly kinematic and structural, in some cases, environmental factors also are reviewed, however, those calibrations are done under no-load conditions. This study aims to review the present state of the art in this field and highlight on the processes and errors considered for the calibration of Stewart platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"volume\":\"31 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员对基于 Stewart 平台的并联运动机械 (PKM) 的精细控制能力进行了广泛研究,其应用领域包括医疗、精密工程机械、航空航天研究、电子芯片制造、汽车制造等。这些应用需要在三维空间内进行微米级和纳米级运动控制,以实现精确、复杂和可重复的运动。为此,PKM 的精度必须高于指定的应用精度水平,因此对 PKM 机器人进行适当的校准至关重要。基于正向运动学的校准对于这类六足机器人来说变得过于复杂,而反向运动学则可以轻松完成这项任务。为了尝试不同的校准技术,我们采用了各种校准方法,包括使用外部仪器、限制系统的一个或多个运动,以及使用额外的传感器进行自动或自我校准。本次调查关注了这些关键方法、其结果以及与基于逆运动学的 PKM 校准相关的重要细节。在这项研究中,我们注意到研究人员将重点放在提高平台位置和方向的精确度上,同时考虑到一个或多个来源造成的误差。考虑的误差源主要是运动学和结构学,在某些情况下,也会审查环境因素,但这些校准都是在空载条件下进行的。本研究旨在回顾该领域的技术现状,并重点介绍校准 Stewart 平台时考虑的过程和误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A LITERATURE REVIEW ON STEWART-GOUGH PLATFORM CALIBRATIONS
Researchers have studied Stewart platform-based Parallel Kinematic Machines (PKM) extensively for their fine control capabilities, for many applications including medicine, precision engineering machines, aerospace research, electronic chip manufacturing, automobile manufacturing, etc. These applications need micro and nano-level movement control in 3D space for the motions to be precise, complicated, and repeatable; a Stewart platform fulfills these challenges smartly. For this, the PKM must be more accurate than the specified application accuracy level and thus proper calibration for a PKM robot is crucial. Forward kinematics-based calibration for such hexapod machines becomes unnecessarily complex and inverse kinematics complete this task with much ease. To experiment different calibration techniques, various calibration approaches were implemented by using external instruments, constraining one or more motions of the system, and using extra sensors for auto or self-calibration. This survey paid attention to those key methodologies, their outcome, and important details related to inverse kinematic-based PKM calibrations. It was observed during this study that the researchers focused on improving the accuracy of the platform position and orientation considering the errors contributed by one source or multiple sources. The error sources considered are mainly kinematic and structural, in some cases, environmental factors also are reviewed, however, those calibrations are done under no-load conditions. This study aims to review the present state of the art in this field and highlight on the processes and errors considered for the calibration of Stewart platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal design of assembling robot considering different limb topologies and layouts Design and Optimization of a Cable-driven Parallel Polishing Robot with Kinematic Error Modeling Fourier-Based Function Generation of Four-Bar Linkages with an Improved Sampling Points Adjustment and Sylvester's Dialytic Elimination Method Trust, Workload and Performance in Human-AI Partnering: The Role of AI Attributes in Solving Classification Problems A Cost-Aware Multi-Agent System for Black-Box Design Space Exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1