绕着社会保障飞行

IF 1.1 Q2 LAW European Labour Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1177/20319525231221096
Federico Pisani, David Mangan
{"title":"绕着社会保障飞行","authors":"Federico Pisani, David Mangan","doi":"10.1177/20319525231221096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INAIL and INPS is a decision about social security and insurance contributions. The case was brought against Ryanair, alleging that contributions were owed to the relevant Italian authorities where the documentation (an E101 certificate, now an A1 form) had not been properly completed by the employing airline. Aircrew personnel were employed under Irish employment contracts, but resided in Italy. Other than 45 minutes per day in the crew room at the airport in Bergamo, these staff were on board an aircraft registered in Ireland.","PeriodicalId":41157,"journal":{"name":"European Labour Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flying around social security\",\"authors\":\"Federico Pisani, David Mangan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20319525231221096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INAIL and INPS is a decision about social security and insurance contributions. The case was brought against Ryanair, alleging that contributions were owed to the relevant Italian authorities where the documentation (an E101 certificate, now an A1 form) had not been properly completed by the employing airline. Aircrew personnel were employed under Irish employment contracts, but resided in Italy. Other than 45 minutes per day in the crew room at the airport in Bergamo, these staff were on board an aircraft registered in Ireland.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Labour Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Labour Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231221096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Labour Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231221096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

INAIL 和 INPS 是一项关于社会保障和保险缴款的裁决。此案是针对瑞安航空公司提出的,声称在雇用航空公司未正确填写文件(E101 证书,现为 A1 表)的情况下,应向意大利有关当局缴纳保险费。空勤人员是根据爱尔兰雇用合同雇用的,但居住在意大利。除了每天在贝加莫机场的机组人员室工作 45 分钟外,这些工作人员都在爱尔兰注册的飞机上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flying around social security
INAIL and INPS is a decision about social security and insurance contributions. The case was brought against Ryanair, alleging that contributions were owed to the relevant Italian authorities where the documentation (an E101 certificate, now an A1 form) had not been properly completed by the employing airline. Aircrew personnel were employed under Irish employment contracts, but resided in Italy. Other than 45 minutes per day in the crew room at the airport in Bergamo, these staff were on board an aircraft registered in Ireland.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Anti-discrimination cases decided by the Court of Justice of the EU in 2023 Resocialisation through prisoner remuneration: The unconstitutionally low remuneration of working prisoners in Germany Work in prison: Reintegration or exclusion and exploitation? Beyond profit: A model framework for ethical and feasible private prison labour Minding the gap? Blind spots in the ILO's and the EU's perspective on anti-forced labour policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1