Nikhitha Lavu, Aneesha Anand, Patrick J. Loehrer, Kenneth A. Kesler
{"title":"接受术后放疗的 II/III 期胸腺上皮肿瘤患者的长期疗效","authors":"Nikhitha Lavu, Aneesha Anand, Patrick J. Loehrer, Kenneth A. Kesler","doi":"10.18060/27867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignancies that originate in the anterior mediastinum. Unlike other tumors of the chest, TETs recur most often in the pleura. The primary treatment of early stage TETs is surgical resection, with the role of adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy controversial. Mixed results have been reported as to whether postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) decreases tumor recurrence or time to recurrence, but PORT can cause short-term and long-term toxicity. Therefore, assessing the benefit of PORT is important. For the present retrospective study, we created a database of stage II/III TET patients seen at Simon Cancer Center from 2000-2023 to examine long-term outcomes. Of the 214 stage II/III TET patients that underwent surgery in the database, 67 patients treated with PORT were isolated. Subsequently, 67 patients who did not receive PORT were matched to the PORT population based on similarities in histology, surgical margins, and chemotherapy received. Local vs. distant tumor recurrence, long-term complications, and overall survival were then compared. The PORT population had the following histologic distribution: 3 Type A, 3 Type AB, 47 Type B1/B2/B3, and 14 carcinoma; for the non-PORT population: 8 Type A, 13 Type AB, 36 Type B1/B2/B3, and 10 carcinoma. There were 16 stage IIA, 6 stage IIB, and 45 stage III patients in the PORT population, and 17 stage IIA, 9 stage IIB, and 41 stage III patients in the non-PORT population. The PORT population had 57 recurrences, whereas the non-PORT population had 20 recurrences (p=1.02 x 10-9). The PORT population had 5 deaths and 50 instances of long-term complications, while the non-PORT population had 3 deaths and 25 instances of long-term complications. Overall, these data do not support the routine usage of PORT in resected Stage II/III TET. Further analysis in larger data sets are warranted.","PeriodicalId":20522,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IMPRS","volume":"24 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes in Stage II/III Thymic Epithelial Tumor Patients Treated with Post- Operative Radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Nikhitha Lavu, Aneesha Anand, Patrick J. Loehrer, Kenneth A. Kesler\",\"doi\":\"10.18060/27867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignancies that originate in the anterior mediastinum. Unlike other tumors of the chest, TETs recur most often in the pleura. The primary treatment of early stage TETs is surgical resection, with the role of adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy controversial. Mixed results have been reported as to whether postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) decreases tumor recurrence or time to recurrence, but PORT can cause short-term and long-term toxicity. Therefore, assessing the benefit of PORT is important. For the present retrospective study, we created a database of stage II/III TET patients seen at Simon Cancer Center from 2000-2023 to examine long-term outcomes. Of the 214 stage II/III TET patients that underwent surgery in the database, 67 patients treated with PORT were isolated. Subsequently, 67 patients who did not receive PORT were matched to the PORT population based on similarities in histology, surgical margins, and chemotherapy received. Local vs. distant tumor recurrence, long-term complications, and overall survival were then compared. The PORT population had the following histologic distribution: 3 Type A, 3 Type AB, 47 Type B1/B2/B3, and 14 carcinoma; for the non-PORT population: 8 Type A, 13 Type AB, 36 Type B1/B2/B3, and 10 carcinoma. There were 16 stage IIA, 6 stage IIB, and 45 stage III patients in the PORT population, and 17 stage IIA, 9 stage IIB, and 41 stage III patients in the non-PORT population. The PORT population had 57 recurrences, whereas the non-PORT population had 20 recurrences (p=1.02 x 10-9). The PORT population had 5 deaths and 50 instances of long-term complications, while the non-PORT population had 3 deaths and 25 instances of long-term complications. Overall, these data do not support the routine usage of PORT in resected Stage II/III TET. Further analysis in larger data sets are warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IMPRS\",\"volume\":\"24 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IMPRS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18060/27867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IMPRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
胸腺上皮肿瘤(TET)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,起源于前纵隔。与胸部其他肿瘤不同,TET 最常在胸膜复发。早期 TET 的主要治疗方法是手术切除,而辅助化疗/放疗的作用则存在争议。关于术后放疗(PORT)是否会降低肿瘤复发率或缩短复发时间,目前报道不一,但PORT会引起短期和长期毒性。因此,评估 PORT 的益处非常重要。在本回顾性研究中,我们建立了一个 2000-2023 年期间在西蒙癌症中心就诊的 II/III 期 TET 患者的数据库,以检查长期疗效。在数据库中接受手术的 214 例 II/III 期 TET 患者中,有 67 例患者接受了 PORT 治疗。随后,根据组织学、手术切缘和接受化疗的相似性,将 67 名未接受 PORT 治疗的患者与 PORT 患者进行配对。然后比较了局部与远处肿瘤复发、长期并发症和总生存率。PORT人群的组织学分布如下:3例A型、3例AB型、47例B1/B2/B3型和14例癌;非PORT人群:8例A型、13例AB型、36例B1/B2/B3型和10例癌。PORT 患者中有 16 名 IIA 期、6 名 IIB 期和 45 名 III 期患者,非 PORT 患者中有 17 名 IIA 期、9 名 IIB 期和 41 名 III 期患者。PORT人群有57例复发,而非PORT人群有20例复发(P=1.02 x 10-9)。PORT 患者中有 5 人死亡,50 人出现长期并发症,而非 PORT 患者中有 3 人死亡,25 人出现长期并发症。总体而言,这些数据并不支持在切除的 II/III 期 TET 中常规使用 PORT。有必要对更大的数据集进行进一步分析。
Long-Term Outcomes in Stage II/III Thymic Epithelial Tumor Patients Treated with Post- Operative Radiotherapy
Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignancies that originate in the anterior mediastinum. Unlike other tumors of the chest, TETs recur most often in the pleura. The primary treatment of early stage TETs is surgical resection, with the role of adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy controversial. Mixed results have been reported as to whether postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) decreases tumor recurrence or time to recurrence, but PORT can cause short-term and long-term toxicity. Therefore, assessing the benefit of PORT is important. For the present retrospective study, we created a database of stage II/III TET patients seen at Simon Cancer Center from 2000-2023 to examine long-term outcomes. Of the 214 stage II/III TET patients that underwent surgery in the database, 67 patients treated with PORT were isolated. Subsequently, 67 patients who did not receive PORT were matched to the PORT population based on similarities in histology, surgical margins, and chemotherapy received. Local vs. distant tumor recurrence, long-term complications, and overall survival were then compared. The PORT population had the following histologic distribution: 3 Type A, 3 Type AB, 47 Type B1/B2/B3, and 14 carcinoma; for the non-PORT population: 8 Type A, 13 Type AB, 36 Type B1/B2/B3, and 10 carcinoma. There were 16 stage IIA, 6 stage IIB, and 45 stage III patients in the PORT population, and 17 stage IIA, 9 stage IIB, and 41 stage III patients in the non-PORT population. The PORT population had 57 recurrences, whereas the non-PORT population had 20 recurrences (p=1.02 x 10-9). The PORT population had 5 deaths and 50 instances of long-term complications, while the non-PORT population had 3 deaths and 25 instances of long-term complications. Overall, these data do not support the routine usage of PORT in resected Stage II/III TET. Further analysis in larger data sets are warranted.