居家生活的老年人对各种福利技术的主观认知、评价和解释:定性研究的系统回顾

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100470
Zada Pajalic , Sofia Elisabeth G. Olsen , Annabel Hamre , Benedicte Sørensen Strøm , Celine Clausen , Diana Saplacan , Gunilla Kulla
{"title":"居家生活的老年人对各种福利技术的主观认知、评价和解释:定性研究的系统回顾","authors":"Zada Pajalic ,&nbsp;Sofia Elisabeth G. Olsen ,&nbsp;Annabel Hamre ,&nbsp;Benedicte Sørensen Strøm ,&nbsp;Celine Clausen ,&nbsp;Diana Saplacan ,&nbsp;Gunilla Kulla","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This paper aims to map home-living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluations, and interpretations of various welfare technologies.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Systematic literature review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was designed as a systematic literature review of qualitative studies. This systematic literature review was carried out according to the PRISMA statement and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190206. The international electronic bibliographic databases included AMED, Academic, CINAHL, Cochrane Reviews, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The scientific evidence was synthesized using qualitative analysis. All aspects of the study method followed COREQ guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following a detailed systematic search and screening of 1405 studies, 10 were included in the systematic review. The study shows that implementing Welfare Technology seems to prolong older adults' independent living in their own homes and was perceived as a complement to face-to-face contact with health care providers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study indicated that older adults consider accepting Welfare Technology as it contributes to a sense of security and empowerment in their everyday lives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000077/pdfft?md5=2be7a930beb33f135837d6ba73ce655c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000077-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluation, and interpretations of various welfare technology: A systematic review of qualitative studies\",\"authors\":\"Zada Pajalic ,&nbsp;Sofia Elisabeth G. Olsen ,&nbsp;Annabel Hamre ,&nbsp;Benedicte Sørensen Strøm ,&nbsp;Celine Clausen ,&nbsp;Diana Saplacan ,&nbsp;Gunilla Kulla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This paper aims to map home-living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluations, and interpretations of various welfare technologies.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Systematic literature review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was designed as a systematic literature review of qualitative studies. This systematic literature review was carried out according to the PRISMA statement and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190206. The international electronic bibliographic databases included AMED, Academic, CINAHL, Cochrane Reviews, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The scientific evidence was synthesized using qualitative analysis. All aspects of the study method followed COREQ guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following a detailed systematic search and screening of 1405 studies, 10 were included in the systematic review. The study shows that implementing Welfare Technology seems to prolong older adults' independent living in their own homes and was perceived as a complement to face-to-face contact with health care providers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study indicated that older adults consider accepting Welfare Technology as it contributes to a sense of security and empowerment in their everyday lives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000077/pdfft?md5=2be7a930beb33f135837d6ba73ce655c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000077-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计系统性文献综述方法本研究设计为定性研究的系统性文献综述。本系统性文献综述根据 PRISMA 声明进行,并在 PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42020190206 中进行了前瞻性注册。国际电子文献数据库包括 AMED、Academic、CINAHL、Cochrane Reviews、EMBASE、Google Scholar、MEDLINE via PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science。通过定性分析对科学证据进行了综合。研究方法的所有方面都遵循了 COREQ 指南。结果在对 1405 项研究进行详细的系统搜索和筛选后,有 10 项研究被纳入系统综述。研究表明,实施福利技术似乎可以延长老年人在自己家中独立生活的时间,并被视为与医疗服务提供者面对面接触的补充。结论这项研究表明,老年人考虑接受福利技术,因为它有助于在日常生活中增强安全感和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Home living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluation, and interpretations of various welfare technology: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Objectives

This paper aims to map home-living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluations, and interpretations of various welfare technologies.

Study design

Systematic literature review.

Methods

The study was designed as a systematic literature review of qualitative studies. This systematic literature review was carried out according to the PRISMA statement and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190206. The international electronic bibliographic databases included AMED, Academic, CINAHL, Cochrane Reviews, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The scientific evidence was synthesized using qualitative analysis. All aspects of the study method followed COREQ guidelines.

Results

Following a detailed systematic search and screening of 1405 studies, 10 were included in the systematic review. The study shows that implementing Welfare Technology seems to prolong older adults' independent living in their own homes and was perceived as a complement to face-to-face contact with health care providers.

Conclusions

This study indicated that older adults consider accepting Welfare Technology as it contributes to a sense of security and empowerment in their everyday lives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dispensing of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in Ireland: A population based study Association between child marriage and high blood glucose level in women: A birth cohort analysis Reaching national Covid-19 vaccination targets whilst decreasing inequalities in vaccine uptake: Public health teams' challenges in supporting disadvantaged populations Syndemic geographic patterns of cancer risk in a health-deprived area of England Young, deprived women are more at risk of testing positive for Chlamydia trachomatis: Results from a cross-sectional multicentre study in French health examination centres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1