描述高中利益相关者对脑震荡后返校框架的偏好。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of School Health Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1111/josh.13434
Heather A. Shepherd OT, PhD, Emily Heming MSc, Nick Reed OT, PhD, Jeffrey G. Caron PhD, Keith O. Yeates PhD, Carolyn A. Emery PT, PhD
{"title":"描述高中利益相关者对脑震荡后返校框架的偏好。","authors":"Heather A. Shepherd OT, PhD,&nbsp;Emily Heming MSc,&nbsp;Nick Reed OT, PhD,&nbsp;Jeffrey G. Caron PhD,&nbsp;Keith O. Yeates PhD,&nbsp;Carolyn A. Emery PT, PhD","doi":"10.1111/josh.13434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n <p>Return to school supports are recommended to facilitate adolescents' re-entry to school following a concussion. However, little is known as to what school stakeholders prefer for a return-to-school process. This study sought to describe the preferences of high school students, parents, and educators for a Return-to-School Framework for adolescents following a concussion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n <p>We conducted qualitative semi-structured, 1-on-1 or group interviews with high school students (n = 6), parents (n = 5), and educators (n = 15) from Calgary, Canada. Interviews aimed to describe participants' preferences for a Return-to-School Framework for students following a concussion. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n <p>We organized the data into 4 main themes: (1) purpose of the Return-to-School Framework; (2) format and operation of the Return-to-School Framework; (3) communication about a student's concussion; and (4) necessity of concussion education for students and educators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity</h3>\n <p>A Return-to-School Framework following concussion should be developed in consultation with families, educators, and students and supports should be tailored to each student.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n <p>Participants preferred a standardized and consistent Return-to-School Framework including ongoing communication between stakeholders as well as feasible and individualized school supports.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Describing High School Stakeholders' Preferences for a Return-to-School Framework Following Concussion\",\"authors\":\"Heather A. Shepherd OT, PhD,&nbsp;Emily Heming MSc,&nbsp;Nick Reed OT, PhD,&nbsp;Jeffrey G. Caron PhD,&nbsp;Keith O. Yeates PhD,&nbsp;Carolyn A. Emery PT, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/josh.13434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n <p>Return to school supports are recommended to facilitate adolescents' re-entry to school following a concussion. However, little is known as to what school stakeholders prefer for a return-to-school process. This study sought to describe the preferences of high school students, parents, and educators for a Return-to-School Framework for adolescents following a concussion.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n <p>We conducted qualitative semi-structured, 1-on-1 or group interviews with high school students (n = 6), parents (n = 5), and educators (n = 15) from Calgary, Canada. Interviews aimed to describe participants' preferences for a Return-to-School Framework for students following a concussion. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n <p>We organized the data into 4 main themes: (1) purpose of the Return-to-School Framework; (2) format and operation of the Return-to-School Framework; (3) communication about a student's concussion; and (4) necessity of concussion education for students and educators.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity</h3>\\n <p>A Return-to-School Framework following concussion should be developed in consultation with families, educators, and students and supports should be tailored to each student.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n <p>Participants preferred a standardized and consistent Return-to-School Framework including ongoing communication between stakeholders as well as feasible and individualized school supports.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josh.13434\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josh.13434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建议为青少年提供返校支持,以帮助他们在脑震荡后重返校园。然而,人们对学校利益相关者在重返学校过程中的偏好知之甚少。本研究试图描述高中学生、家长和教育工作者对青少年脑震荡后重返学校框架的偏好:我们对加拿大卡尔加里的高中生(6 人)、家长(5 人)和教育工作者(15 人)进行了半结构化、一对一或小组定性访谈。访谈旨在描述参与者对脑震荡后学生返校框架的偏好。访谈采用传统的内容分析法进行分析:我们将数据归纳为四大主题:(1) "重返校园框架 "的目的;(2) "重返校园框架 "的形式和操作;(3) 有关学生脑震荡的沟通;(4) 对学生和教育工作者进行脑震荡教育的必要性:对学校卫生政策、实践和公平的启示:在制定脑震荡后重返学校框架时,应与家庭、教育工作者和学生协商,并为每个学生提供量身定制的支持:结论:与会者倾向于制定一个标准化和一致的重返学校框架,包括利益相关者之间的持续沟通以及可行的个性化学校支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Describing High School Stakeholders' Preferences for a Return-to-School Framework Following Concussion

Background

Return to school supports are recommended to facilitate adolescents' re-entry to school following a concussion. However, little is known as to what school stakeholders prefer for a return-to-school process. This study sought to describe the preferences of high school students, parents, and educators for a Return-to-School Framework for adolescents following a concussion.

Methods

We conducted qualitative semi-structured, 1-on-1 or group interviews with high school students (n = 6), parents (n = 5), and educators (n = 15) from Calgary, Canada. Interviews aimed to describe participants' preferences for a Return-to-School Framework for students following a concussion. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis.

Results

We organized the data into 4 main themes: (1) purpose of the Return-to-School Framework; (2) format and operation of the Return-to-School Framework; (3) communication about a student's concussion; and (4) necessity of concussion education for students and educators.

Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity

A Return-to-School Framework following concussion should be developed in consultation with families, educators, and students and supports should be tailored to each student.

Conclusions

Participants preferred a standardized and consistent Return-to-School Framework including ongoing communication between stakeholders as well as feasible and individualized school supports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
期刊最新文献
Primary School Pupils' Perceptions and Experiences of Wearable Technologies. Racial Disparities in a Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program: Abstinence-Only Versus a Comprehensive Sexuality Education Program. National Health Education Standards: Model Guidance for Curriculum and Instruction (Third Edition). Effect of Delaying High School Start Time on Teen Physical Activity, Screen Use, and Sports and Extracurricular Activity Participation: Results From START. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1