Douglas Neves, Paulo Ricardo Marques Filho, Raquel da Silva Townsend, Cristiano Dos Santos Rodrigues, Luciana Tagliari, Laura Cordeiro Madeira, Mariana Fensterseifer Mattioni, Márcio Luiz Ferreira de Camillis, Clarissa Garcia Soares Leães, Juliana Mara Stormovski de Andrade, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Daniel Sganzerla, Laura Drehmer, Denis Fernandes Madruga da Costa, André Sant'Ana Machado, Regis Goulart Rosa, Pedro Dal Lago
{"title":"垂直定位对机械通气重症监护室患者肺通气的影响:随机交叉临床试验。","authors":"Douglas Neves, Paulo Ricardo Marques Filho, Raquel da Silva Townsend, Cristiano Dos Santos Rodrigues, Luciana Tagliari, Laura Cordeiro Madeira, Mariana Fensterseifer Mattioni, Márcio Luiz Ferreira de Camillis, Clarissa Garcia Soares Leães, Juliana Mara Stormovski de Andrade, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Daniel Sganzerla, Laura Drehmer, Denis Fernandes Madruga da Costa, André Sant'Ana Machado, Regis Goulart Rosa, Pedro Dal Lago","doi":"10.5935/2965-2774.20230069-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of different vertical positions on lung aeration in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An open-label randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted between January and July 2020. Adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for > 24 hours and < 7 days with hemodynamic, respiratory and neurological stability were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the sitting position followed by passive orthostasis condition or the passive orthostasis followed by the sitting position condition. The primary outcome was lung aeration assessed using the lung ultrasound score (score ranges from 0 [better] to 36 [worse]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 186 subjects were screened; of these subjects, 19 were enrolled (57.8% male; mean age, 73.2 years). All participants were assigned to receive at least one verticalization protocol. Passive orthostasis resulted in mean lung ultrasound scores that did not differ significantly from the sitting position (11.0 versus 13.7; mean difference, -2.7; [95%CI -6.1 to 0.71; p = 0.11). Adverse events occurred in three subjects in the passive orthostasis group and in one in the sitting position group (p = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis did not find significant differences in lung aeration between the sitting and passive orthostasis groups. A randomized crossover clinical trial assessing the impact of vertical positioning on lung aeration in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation is feasible. Unfortunately, the study was interrupted due to the need to treat COVID-19 patients.ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT04176445.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"35 4","pages":"367-376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10802776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of vertical positioning on lung aeration among mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a randomized crossover clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas Neves, Paulo Ricardo Marques Filho, Raquel da Silva Townsend, Cristiano Dos Santos Rodrigues, Luciana Tagliari, Laura Cordeiro Madeira, Mariana Fensterseifer Mattioni, Márcio Luiz Ferreira de Camillis, Clarissa Garcia Soares Leães, Juliana Mara Stormovski de Andrade, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Daniel Sganzerla, Laura Drehmer, Denis Fernandes Madruga da Costa, André Sant'Ana Machado, Regis Goulart Rosa, Pedro Dal Lago\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/2965-2774.20230069-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of different vertical positions on lung aeration in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An open-label randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted between January and July 2020. Adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for > 24 hours and < 7 days with hemodynamic, respiratory and neurological stability were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the sitting position followed by passive orthostasis condition or the passive orthostasis followed by the sitting position condition. The primary outcome was lung aeration assessed using the lung ultrasound score (score ranges from 0 [better] to 36 [worse]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 186 subjects were screened; of these subjects, 19 were enrolled (57.8% male; mean age, 73.2 years). All participants were assigned to receive at least one verticalization protocol. Passive orthostasis resulted in mean lung ultrasound scores that did not differ significantly from the sitting position (11.0 versus 13.7; mean difference, -2.7; [95%CI -6.1 to 0.71; p = 0.11). Adverse events occurred in three subjects in the passive orthostasis group and in one in the sitting position group (p = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis did not find significant differences in lung aeration between the sitting and passive orthostasis groups. A randomized crossover clinical trial assessing the impact of vertical positioning on lung aeration in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation is feasible. Unfortunately, the study was interrupted due to the need to treat COVID-19 patients.ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT04176445.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care science\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"367-376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10802776/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230069-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230069-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of vertical positioning on lung aeration among mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a randomized crossover clinical trial.
Objective: To assess the impact of different vertical positions on lung aeration in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.
Methods: An open-label randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted between January and July 2020. Adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for > 24 hours and < 7 days with hemodynamic, respiratory and neurological stability were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the sitting position followed by passive orthostasis condition or the passive orthostasis followed by the sitting position condition. The primary outcome was lung aeration assessed using the lung ultrasound score (score ranges from 0 [better] to 36 [worse]).
Results: A total of 186 subjects were screened; of these subjects, 19 were enrolled (57.8% male; mean age, 73.2 years). All participants were assigned to receive at least one verticalization protocol. Passive orthostasis resulted in mean lung ultrasound scores that did not differ significantly from the sitting position (11.0 versus 13.7; mean difference, -2.7; [95%CI -6.1 to 0.71; p = 0.11). Adverse events occurred in three subjects in the passive orthostasis group and in one in the sitting position group (p = 0.99).
Conclusion: This analysis did not find significant differences in lung aeration between the sitting and passive orthostasis groups. A randomized crossover clinical trial assessing the impact of vertical positioning on lung aeration in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation is feasible. Unfortunately, the study was interrupted due to the need to treat COVID-19 patients.ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT04176445.