关爱:一项关于晚期痴呆症患者与其护理人员之间个人护理互动的自然观察研究。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae004
Tamara Backhouse, Yun-Hee Jeon, Anne Killett, Jessica Green, Mizanur Khondoker, Eneida Mioshi
{"title":"关爱:一项关于晚期痴呆症患者与其护理人员之间个人护理互动的自然观察研究。","authors":"Tamara Backhouse, Yun-Hee Jeon, Anne Killett, Jessica Green, Mizanur Khondoker, Eneida Mioshi","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Personal care interactions can provide vital opportunities for caregivers to engage with a person living with advanced dementia. However, interactions may also be a contentious experience, what makes this so is not fully understood. We aimed to examine features of personal care interactions between caregivers and people with advanced dementia to understand how care may be improved.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was a naturalistic observation study using one-off video-recorded observations of personal care interactions between 14 people with advanced dementia and 12 caregivers (n = 7 care-home staff, n = 5 family carers) in the United Kingdom (total observation time 03:01:52). Observations were analyzed with observational video coding to determine the frequency of actions of people with dementia and qualitative content analysis for in-depth examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Refusals of care were present in 32% of video sections. Active engagement of people with dementia was observed in 66% of sections. Rare contentious interactional components were characterized by the person with dementia appearing to show uneasiness and caregivers being flustered and uncertain. However, caregivers typically emanated a nurturing attentiveness, were attuned to the person, and skilled in seamlessly supporting them through care activities.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings draw on real-world empirical evidence to reinvigorate the notion of person-centeredness in dementia care. The findings provide much needed insight into practical ways to improve care interactions for people with advanced dementia and enhance their personhood. Appropriate training/guidance for caregivers could support positive personal care experiences for both the person with dementia and caregiver.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurturing Attentiveness: A Naturalistic Observation Study of Personal Care Interactions Between People With Advanced Dementia and Their Caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Backhouse, Yun-Hee Jeon, Anne Killett, Jessica Green, Mizanur Khondoker, Eneida Mioshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnae004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Personal care interactions can provide vital opportunities for caregivers to engage with a person living with advanced dementia. However, interactions may also be a contentious experience, what makes this so is not fully understood. We aimed to examine features of personal care interactions between caregivers and people with advanced dementia to understand how care may be improved.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was a naturalistic observation study using one-off video-recorded observations of personal care interactions between 14 people with advanced dementia and 12 caregivers (n = 7 care-home staff, n = 5 family carers) in the United Kingdom (total observation time 03:01:52). Observations were analyzed with observational video coding to determine the frequency of actions of people with dementia and qualitative content analysis for in-depth examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Refusals of care were present in 32% of video sections. Active engagement of people with dementia was observed in 66% of sections. Rare contentious interactional components were characterized by the person with dementia appearing to show uneasiness and caregivers being flustered and uncertain. However, caregivers typically emanated a nurturing attentiveness, were attuned to the person, and skilled in seamlessly supporting them through care activities.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings draw on real-world empirical evidence to reinvigorate the notion of person-centeredness in dementia care. The findings provide much needed insight into practical ways to improve care interactions for people with advanced dementia and enhance their personhood. Appropriate training/guidance for caregivers could support positive personal care experiences for both the person with dementia and caregiver.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102004/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:个人护理互动可为护理人员提供与晚期痴呆症患者接触的重要机会。然而,互动也可能是一种有争议的经历,而造成这种情况的原因尚未完全明了。我们旨在研究照护者与晚期痴呆症患者之间个人照护互动的特点,以了解如何改善照护:这是一项自然观察研究,我们对英国 14 名晚期痴呆症患者和 12 名护理人员(7 名护理院工作人员,5 名家庭护理人员)之间的个人护理互动进行了一次性视频录像观察(总观察时间为 03:01:52)。观察结果通过观察视频编码进行分析,以确定痴呆症患者的行动频率,并通过定性内容分析进行深入研究:结果:32%的视频中存在拒绝护理的情况。在 66% 的视频中可以观察到痴呆症患者的积极参与。罕见的有争议的互动部分表现为痴呆症患者表现出不安,而护理人员则显得慌乱和不确定。然而,护理人员通常会散发出一种关爱,与痴呆症患者保持一致,并熟练地在护理活动中为他们提供无缝支持:研究结果借鉴了现实世界的经验证据,为痴呆症护理中的 "以人为本 "理念注入了新的活力。研究结果为改善晚期痴呆症患者的护理互动和提高他们的人格提供了亟需的实用方法。对护理人员进行适当的培训/指导,可以为痴呆症患者和护理人员提供积极的个人护理体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurturing Attentiveness: A Naturalistic Observation Study of Personal Care Interactions Between People With Advanced Dementia and Their Caregivers.

Background and objectives: Personal care interactions can provide vital opportunities for caregivers to engage with a person living with advanced dementia. However, interactions may also be a contentious experience, what makes this so is not fully understood. We aimed to examine features of personal care interactions between caregivers and people with advanced dementia to understand how care may be improved.

Research design and methods: This was a naturalistic observation study using one-off video-recorded observations of personal care interactions between 14 people with advanced dementia and 12 caregivers (n = 7 care-home staff, n = 5 family carers) in the United Kingdom (total observation time 03:01:52). Observations were analyzed with observational video coding to determine the frequency of actions of people with dementia and qualitative content analysis for in-depth examination.

Results: Refusals of care were present in 32% of video sections. Active engagement of people with dementia was observed in 66% of sections. Rare contentious interactional components were characterized by the person with dementia appearing to show uneasiness and caregivers being flustered and uncertain. However, caregivers typically emanated a nurturing attentiveness, were attuned to the person, and skilled in seamlessly supporting them through care activities.

Discussion and implications: Findings draw on real-world empirical evidence to reinvigorate the notion of person-centeredness in dementia care. The findings provide much needed insight into practical ways to improve care interactions for people with advanced dementia and enhance their personhood. Appropriate training/guidance for caregivers could support positive personal care experiences for both the person with dementia and caregiver.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Caregiving Challenges from Persistent Pain Among Family Caregivers to People with Dementia. Usability Testing of the PACE-App to Support Family Caregivers in Managing Pain for People with Dementia. The Evolution in Dementia Caregiving Research: NIA's Catalyst Role. Celebrating the National Institute on Aging's 50th Anniversary: The Gerontologist Special Collection. Digital Contact as Strain or Support: How Does Type of Contact Shape the Association between Mother-child Interactions and Adult Children's Depressive Symptoms in Later-life Families?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1