改进的化学物质毒理学分析方法。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1080/15376516.2024.2310012
Michael Oluwatoyin Daniyan, Nusrat Omotayo Omisore, Oluwole Isaac Adeyemi, Ayokunmi Stephen Olusa, Samuel Folarin Olaniran, Idris Ajayi Oyemitan, Moses Atanda Akanmu, Gbola Olayiwola
{"title":"改进的化学物质毒理学分析方法。","authors":"Michael Oluwatoyin Daniyan, Nusrat Omotayo Omisore, Oluwole Isaac Adeyemi, Ayokunmi Stephen Olusa, Samuel Folarin Olaniran, Idris Ajayi Oyemitan, Moses Atanda Akanmu, Gbola Olayiwola","doi":"10.1080/15376516.2024.2310012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Toxicity profiling is an integral part of the drug discovery pipeline. The 3Rs principle-Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement, is considered a golden rule in determining the most appropriate approach for toxicity studies. The acute toxicity study with proper estimate of median lethal dose (LD<sub>50</sub>) is usually an initial procedure for the determination of most suitable test doses for preclinical toxicological and pharmacological profiling. Several methods, which have been devised to determine the LD<sub>50</sub>, are faced with the challenge of using a large number of animals and time constraints. Despite the inherent advantage of the newer OECD Test Guidelines, the increasing concerns among toxicologists, the regulatory authorities and the general public, on the need to adhere to 3Rs principle, necessitated the need for an improved approach. Such an approach should not only minimize the time and number of animals required, but also take into cognizance animal welfare, and give accurate, comparable, and reproducible results across laboratories. While taking advantage of the inherent merits of the existing methods, here is presented the mathematical basis and evaluation of an improved method for toxicity profiling of test substances and estimation of LD<sub>50</sub>. The method makes use of the generated Table of values for the selection of appropriate test doses. Our proposed method has capacities to optimize the time and number of animal use, ensure more reliable and reproducible results across laboratories, allow for easy selection of doses for subsequent toxicity profiling, and be adaptable to other biological screening beyond toxicity studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23177,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An improved method for toxicological profiling of chemical substances.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Oluwatoyin Daniyan, Nusrat Omotayo Omisore, Oluwole Isaac Adeyemi, Ayokunmi Stephen Olusa, Samuel Folarin Olaniran, Idris Ajayi Oyemitan, Moses Atanda Akanmu, Gbola Olayiwola\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15376516.2024.2310012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Toxicity profiling is an integral part of the drug discovery pipeline. The 3Rs principle-Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement, is considered a golden rule in determining the most appropriate approach for toxicity studies. The acute toxicity study with proper estimate of median lethal dose (LD<sub>50</sub>) is usually an initial procedure for the determination of most suitable test doses for preclinical toxicological and pharmacological profiling. Several methods, which have been devised to determine the LD<sub>50</sub>, are faced with the challenge of using a large number of animals and time constraints. Despite the inherent advantage of the newer OECD Test Guidelines, the increasing concerns among toxicologists, the regulatory authorities and the general public, on the need to adhere to 3Rs principle, necessitated the need for an improved approach. Such an approach should not only minimize the time and number of animals required, but also take into cognizance animal welfare, and give accurate, comparable, and reproducible results across laboratories. While taking advantage of the inherent merits of the existing methods, here is presented the mathematical basis and evaluation of an improved method for toxicity profiling of test substances and estimation of LD<sub>50</sub>. The method makes use of the generated Table of values for the selection of appropriate test doses. Our proposed method has capacities to optimize the time and number of animal use, ensure more reliable and reproducible results across laboratories, allow for easy selection of doses for subsequent toxicity profiling, and be adaptable to other biological screening beyond toxicity studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2024.2310012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2024.2310012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毒性分析是药物研发过程中不可或缺的一部分。3R原则--替换、减少和完善,被认为是确定毒性研究最合适方法的黄金法则。进行急性毒性研究并适当估计中位致死剂量(LD50),通常是确定临床前毒理学和药理学分析最合适试验剂量的初始程序。为确定 LD50 而设计的几种方法都面临着使用大量动物和时间限制的挑战。尽管较新的《经合组织测试指南》具有固有的优势,但毒理学家、监管机构和公众对遵守 3Rs 原则的关注与日俱增,因此有必要改进方法。这种方法不仅要最大限度地减少所需的时间和动物数量,还要考虑到动物福利,并在不同实验室之间提供准确、可比和可重复的结果。在利用现有方法固有优点的同时,本文介绍了一种改进方法的数学基础和评估方法,用于测试物质的毒性剖析和半数致死剂量(LD50)的估算。该方法利用生成的数值表来选择适当的试验剂量。我们提出的方法能够优化使用动物的时间和数量,确保各实验室得出的结果更可靠、更具有可重复性,便于为后续毒性分析选择剂量,并可用于毒性研究之外的其他生物筛选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An improved method for toxicological profiling of chemical substances.

Toxicity profiling is an integral part of the drug discovery pipeline. The 3Rs principle-Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement, is considered a golden rule in determining the most appropriate approach for toxicity studies. The acute toxicity study with proper estimate of median lethal dose (LD50) is usually an initial procedure for the determination of most suitable test doses for preclinical toxicological and pharmacological profiling. Several methods, which have been devised to determine the LD50, are faced with the challenge of using a large number of animals and time constraints. Despite the inherent advantage of the newer OECD Test Guidelines, the increasing concerns among toxicologists, the regulatory authorities and the general public, on the need to adhere to 3Rs principle, necessitated the need for an improved approach. Such an approach should not only minimize the time and number of animals required, but also take into cognizance animal welfare, and give accurate, comparable, and reproducible results across laboratories. While taking advantage of the inherent merits of the existing methods, here is presented the mathematical basis and evaluation of an improved method for toxicity profiling of test substances and estimation of LD50. The method makes use of the generated Table of values for the selection of appropriate test doses. Our proposed method has capacities to optimize the time and number of animal use, ensure more reliable and reproducible results across laboratories, allow for easy selection of doses for subsequent toxicity profiling, and be adaptable to other biological screening beyond toxicity studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods is a peer-reviewed journal whose aim is twofold. Firstly, the journal contains original research on subjects dealing with the mechanisms by which foreign chemicals cause toxic tissue injury. Chemical substances of interest include industrial compounds, environmental pollutants, hazardous wastes, drugs, pesticides, and chemical warfare agents. The scope of the journal spans from molecular and cellular mechanisms of action to the consideration of mechanistic evidence in establishing regulatory policy. Secondly, the journal addresses aspects of the development, validation, and application of new and existing laboratory methods, techniques, and equipment. A variety of research methods are discussed, including: In vivo studies with standard and alternative species In vitro studies and alternative methodologies Molecular, biochemical, and cellular techniques Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics Mathematical modeling and computer programs Forensic analyses Risk assessment Data collection and analysis.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of genotoxic damage induced by exposure to binary mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and three heavy metals in male mice. Inonotus obliquus aqueous extract inhibits intestinal inflammation and insulin metabolism defects in Drosophila. In vitro evaluation of the toxicological effects of cooking oil fumes using a self-designed microfluidic chip. Naturally-derived phenethyl isothiocyanate modulates apoptotic induction through regulation of the intrinsic cascade and resulting apoptosome formation in human malignant melanoma cells. Time-course cross-species transcriptomics reveals conserved hepatotoxicity pathways induced by repeated administration of cyclosporine A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1