{"title":"日本妇产科临床实践指南中的经济利益冲突","authors":"Anju Murayama, Keishi Miyazawa, Sae Kamamoto, Haruki Shigeta, Hinari Kugo, Kenichi Higuchi, Yuki Senoo","doi":"10.1002/ctd2.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary analysis evaluated the size and prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among authors of Japanese obstetrics and gynaecology clinical practice guidelines. Our analysis found that 66% of all authors received personal payments totalling US$1.2 million during the guideline development period. Furthermore, the guideline chairpersons received much larger payments than those to other authors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72605,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and translational discovery","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ctd2.273","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial conflicts of interest in Japanese obstetrics and gynaecology clinical practice guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Anju Murayama, Keishi Miyazawa, Sae Kamamoto, Haruki Shigeta, Hinari Kugo, Kenichi Higuchi, Yuki Senoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ctd2.273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This commentary analysis evaluated the size and prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among authors of Japanese obstetrics and gynaecology clinical practice guidelines. Our analysis found that 66% of all authors received personal payments totalling US$1.2 million during the guideline development period. Furthermore, the guideline chairpersons received much larger payments than those to other authors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and translational discovery\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ctd2.273\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and translational discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctd2.273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and translational discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctd2.273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Financial conflicts of interest in Japanese obstetrics and gynaecology clinical practice guidelines
This commentary analysis evaluated the size and prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among authors of Japanese obstetrics and gynaecology clinical practice guidelines. Our analysis found that 66% of all authors received personal payments totalling US$1.2 million during the guideline development period. Furthermore, the guideline chairpersons received much larger payments than those to other authors.