Stephen D Bigach, Akshar P Thakkar, Lucas T Buchler, Michael B Ellman, Sanjeev Bhatia, Michael D Stover
{"title":"髋臼周围截骨术的趋势、人口统计学和再手术率:PearlDiver 数据库分析","authors":"Stephen D Bigach, Akshar P Thakkar, Lucas T Buchler, Michael B Ellman, Sanjeev Bhatia, Michael D Stover","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnad040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the trends and demographics of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) in the United States from 2016 to 2020 using a large healthcare database analysis. The PearlDiver database was queried for patients who underwent a PAO procedure starting with current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 27299, S2115 and 27146. Subsequently, the population was filtered for patients being ages 12–50, having an inpatient charge-type and those having a length of stay of at least 1 day. Patients with total hip arthroplasty were filtered out, and the resulting population was filtered by ICD-10 diagnosis codes. The providers of each patient were also examined to ensure their history of treating hip dysplasia. Student t and multiple regression analysis tests were used for statistical comparisons and trends analysis (P < 0.05 reported as significant). A total of 535 consecutive patients were analyzed over the study period. There was a higher incidence of PAO in females compared with males (P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of PAO in patients aged 15–19 years compared with older age groups (P = 0.017). Within the first year after the index PAO, 171 of the 535 patients, almost one-third (32%), received a reoperation. Of the 171 reoperations, 115 were deep removal of implant, 55 were a hip arthroscopy and 1 patient had a bone excision for heterotopic ossification. Similar studies should be carried out using other large health databases to confirm the external validity of these trends and rates across the United States.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends, demographics and reoperation rates of periacetabular osteotomy: an analysis from the PearlDiver database\",\"authors\":\"Stephen D Bigach, Akshar P Thakkar, Lucas T Buchler, Michael B Ellman, Sanjeev Bhatia, Michael D Stover\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jhps/hnad040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to examine the trends and demographics of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) in the United States from 2016 to 2020 using a large healthcare database analysis. The PearlDiver database was queried for patients who underwent a PAO procedure starting with current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 27299, S2115 and 27146. Subsequently, the population was filtered for patients being ages 12–50, having an inpatient charge-type and those having a length of stay of at least 1 day. Patients with total hip arthroplasty were filtered out, and the resulting population was filtered by ICD-10 diagnosis codes. The providers of each patient were also examined to ensure their history of treating hip dysplasia. Student t and multiple regression analysis tests were used for statistical comparisons and trends analysis (P < 0.05 reported as significant). A total of 535 consecutive patients were analyzed over the study period. There was a higher incidence of PAO in females compared with males (P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of PAO in patients aged 15–19 years compared with older age groups (P = 0.017). Within the first year after the index PAO, 171 of the 535 patients, almost one-third (32%), received a reoperation. Of the 171 reoperations, 115 were deep removal of implant, 55 were a hip arthroscopy and 1 patient had a bone excision for heterotopic ossification. Similar studies should be carried out using other large health databases to confirm the external validity of these trends and rates across the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在通过大型医疗保健数据库分析,研究 2016 年至 2020 年美国髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)的发展趋势和人口统计数据。研究人员从 PearlDiver 数据库中查询了接受 PAO 手术的患者,这些患者的当前手术术语(CPT)代码为 27299、S2115 和 27146。随后,筛选出年龄在 12-50 岁、住院费用类型和住院时间至少为 1 天的患者。过滤掉了全髋关节置换术患者,并根据 ICD-10 诊断代码过滤出了患者群体。此外,还对每位患者的医疗服务提供者进行了调查,以确保他们有治疗髋关节发育不良的历史。统计比较和趋势分析采用了学生 t 检验和多元回归分析检验(P < 0.05 为显著)。在研究期间,共对 535 名连续患者进行了分析。女性 PAO 发病率高于男性(P < 0.001),15-19 岁患者 PAO 发病率高于老年患者(P = 0.017)。在指数 PAO 后的第一年内,535 名患者中有 171 人(近三分之一(32%))接受了再次手术。在这 171 例再次手术中,115 例是深部移除植入物,55 例是髋关节镜手术,1 例患者因异位骨化进行了骨切除术。应利用其他大型健康数据库开展类似研究,以确认全美这些趋势和比率的外部有效性。
Trends, demographics and reoperation rates of periacetabular osteotomy: an analysis from the PearlDiver database
This study aims to examine the trends and demographics of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) in the United States from 2016 to 2020 using a large healthcare database analysis. The PearlDiver database was queried for patients who underwent a PAO procedure starting with current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 27299, S2115 and 27146. Subsequently, the population was filtered for patients being ages 12–50, having an inpatient charge-type and those having a length of stay of at least 1 day. Patients with total hip arthroplasty were filtered out, and the resulting population was filtered by ICD-10 diagnosis codes. The providers of each patient were also examined to ensure their history of treating hip dysplasia. Student t and multiple regression analysis tests were used for statistical comparisons and trends analysis (P < 0.05 reported as significant). A total of 535 consecutive patients were analyzed over the study period. There was a higher incidence of PAO in females compared with males (P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of PAO in patients aged 15–19 years compared with older age groups (P = 0.017). Within the first year after the index PAO, 171 of the 535 patients, almost one-third (32%), received a reoperation. Of the 171 reoperations, 115 were deep removal of implant, 55 were a hip arthroscopy and 1 patient had a bone excision for heterotopic ossification. Similar studies should be carried out using other large health databases to confirm the external validity of these trends and rates across the United States.