P424 利用内镜刷分析溃疡性结肠炎患者的肠道微生物群

B Lee, B Keum, S Kim, H Jeon, Y Jeen, C Hoonjai
{"title":"P424 利用内镜刷分析溃疡性结肠炎患者的肠道微生物群","authors":"B Lee, B Keum, S Kim, H Jeon, Y Jeen, C Hoonjai","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The precise pathogenesis of the Ulcerative colitis is still yet unknown, but one of its cause is known to be microbial dysbiosis. The mucosa-associated microbiota are more deeply involved in the pathogenesis of UC. However, the optimal sampling of mucosa-associated microbiome has yet to be investigated. In this study, we investigated the mucosa-associated microbiome in patients with ulcerative colitis, using endoscopic brush samples. We hypothesized that endoscopic brushing is precise and noninvasive method to get sample of mucosa-associated microbiome. Methods Patients with UC who visited the gastroenterology department of Korea University Anam hospital were screened for this study. Clinical data such as medical records, colonoscopy and fecal samples were reviewed. Using a stool and saliva sample collector kit respectively, the subjects provided stool and saliva samples. Brushing samples were collected during the sigmoidoscopy procedure with 3-4 brush strokes on the colon mucosa using the cytology brush. The samples were analyzed for microbiome in the Korea University Medical Center. Results From July 2022 to January 2023, we prospectively enrolled 19 patients with UC. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the most common species in microbiota of brush, stool and saliva.(Fig.1-1) The microbiome between stool and brush was no significant difference in alpha and beta diversities.(Fig.1-2) However, Oral microbiome was different from stool and brush in beta diversities.(Fig.1-3) Patients were categorized into to analyze the oral microbiome. A trend was observed where increased disease severity was associated with an increase in Firmicutes.(Fig.1-4) Conclusion The microbiome of stool and brush was no significantly different. However, the novel sampling of mucosa-associated microbiome, endoscopic brush, is not inferior compared to currently used sampling of stool. Also the analysis of the oral microbiome suggested that Firmicutes could be considered a useful biomarker for assessing disease severity. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct followup research by increasing the number of subjects.","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P424 Analysis of the intestinal microbiome using an Endoscopic Brush in Ulcerative colitis\",\"authors\":\"B Lee, B Keum, S Kim, H Jeon, Y Jeen, C Hoonjai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The precise pathogenesis of the Ulcerative colitis is still yet unknown, but one of its cause is known to be microbial dysbiosis. The mucosa-associated microbiota are more deeply involved in the pathogenesis of UC. However, the optimal sampling of mucosa-associated microbiome has yet to be investigated. In this study, we investigated the mucosa-associated microbiome in patients with ulcerative colitis, using endoscopic brush samples. We hypothesized that endoscopic brushing is precise and noninvasive method to get sample of mucosa-associated microbiome. Methods Patients with UC who visited the gastroenterology department of Korea University Anam hospital were screened for this study. Clinical data such as medical records, colonoscopy and fecal samples were reviewed. Using a stool and saliva sample collector kit respectively, the subjects provided stool and saliva samples. Brushing samples were collected during the sigmoidoscopy procedure with 3-4 brush strokes on the colon mucosa using the cytology brush. The samples were analyzed for microbiome in the Korea University Medical Center. Results From July 2022 to January 2023, we prospectively enrolled 19 patients with UC. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the most common species in microbiota of brush, stool and saliva.(Fig.1-1) The microbiome between stool and brush was no significant difference in alpha and beta diversities.(Fig.1-2) However, Oral microbiome was different from stool and brush in beta diversities.(Fig.1-3) Patients were categorized into to analyze the oral microbiome. A trend was observed where increased disease severity was associated with an increase in Firmicutes.(Fig.1-4) Conclusion The microbiome of stool and brush was no significantly different. However, the novel sampling of mucosa-associated microbiome, endoscopic brush, is not inferior compared to currently used sampling of stool. Also the analysis of the oral microbiome suggested that Firmicutes could be considered a useful biomarker for assessing disease severity. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct followup research by increasing the number of subjects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 溃疡性结肠炎的确切发病机制尚不清楚,但已知其病因之一是微生物菌群失调。粘膜相关微生物群与溃疡性结肠炎的发病机制关系更为密切。然而,粘膜相关微生物群的最佳取样方法仍有待研究。在这项研究中,我们使用内镜刷取样研究了溃疡性结肠炎患者的粘膜相关微生物群。我们假设内镜刷取样本是获取粘膜相关微生物组样本的精确且无创的方法。方法 本研究筛选了在韩国大学安南医院消化内科就诊的 UC 患者。研究人员审查了病历、结肠镜检查和粪便样本等临床数据。受试者分别使用粪便和唾液样本采集器提供粪便和唾液样本。在乙状结肠镜检查过程中,使用细胞学刷子在结肠粘膜上刷3-4下,收集刷子样本。样本在韩国大学医学中心进行微生物组分析。结果 从 2022 年 7 月到 2023 年 1 月,我们对 19 名 UC 患者进行了前瞻性研究。在刷子、粪便和唾液的微生物群中,固着菌、类杆菌、蛋白菌和放线菌是最常见的菌种。(图 1-1)粪便和刷子的微生物群在α和β多样性方面没有显著差异。(图 1-2)但是,口腔微生物群在β多样性方面与粪便和刷子不同。图 1-4 结论 粪便和刷子中的微生物组没有明显差异。不过,与目前使用的粪便取样相比,内窥镜刷取样粘膜相关微生物群的新方法并不逊色。此外,对口腔微生物群的分析表明,固形菌可被视为评估疾病严重程度的有用生物标志物。因此,有必要通过增加研究对象的数量来开展后续研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P424 Analysis of the intestinal microbiome using an Endoscopic Brush in Ulcerative colitis
Background The precise pathogenesis of the Ulcerative colitis is still yet unknown, but one of its cause is known to be microbial dysbiosis. The mucosa-associated microbiota are more deeply involved in the pathogenesis of UC. However, the optimal sampling of mucosa-associated microbiome has yet to be investigated. In this study, we investigated the mucosa-associated microbiome in patients with ulcerative colitis, using endoscopic brush samples. We hypothesized that endoscopic brushing is precise and noninvasive method to get sample of mucosa-associated microbiome. Methods Patients with UC who visited the gastroenterology department of Korea University Anam hospital were screened for this study. Clinical data such as medical records, colonoscopy and fecal samples were reviewed. Using a stool and saliva sample collector kit respectively, the subjects provided stool and saliva samples. Brushing samples were collected during the sigmoidoscopy procedure with 3-4 brush strokes on the colon mucosa using the cytology brush. The samples were analyzed for microbiome in the Korea University Medical Center. Results From July 2022 to January 2023, we prospectively enrolled 19 patients with UC. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the most common species in microbiota of brush, stool and saliva.(Fig.1-1) The microbiome between stool and brush was no significant difference in alpha and beta diversities.(Fig.1-2) However, Oral microbiome was different from stool and brush in beta diversities.(Fig.1-3) Patients were categorized into to analyze the oral microbiome. A trend was observed where increased disease severity was associated with an increase in Firmicutes.(Fig.1-4) Conclusion The microbiome of stool and brush was no significantly different. However, the novel sampling of mucosa-associated microbiome, endoscopic brush, is not inferior compared to currently used sampling of stool. Also the analysis of the oral microbiome suggested that Firmicutes could be considered a useful biomarker for assessing disease severity. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct followup research by increasing the number of subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: a review of the role of gut microbiota and bacterial biofilms in disease pathogenesis Etrasimod for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Analysis of Infection Events From the ELEVATE UC Clinical Program Fibrosis-related transcriptome unveils a distinctive remodeling matrix pattern in penetrating ileal Crohn's disease TOpCLASS Expert Consensus Classification of Perianal Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease: A Real-World Application in a Serial Fistula MRI Cohort Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder symptoms are not as frequent as other eating disorder symptoms when ulcerative colitis is in remission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1