机器学习模型开发中的全景成像误差:系统综述。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1093/dmfr/twae002
Eduardo Delamare, Xingyue Fu, Zimo Huang, Jinman Kim
{"title":"机器学习模型开发中的全景成像误差:系统综述。","authors":"Eduardo Delamare, Xingyue Fu, Zimo Huang, Jinman Kim","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the management of imaging errors from panoramic radiography (PAN) datasets used in the development of machine learning (ML) models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and used three databases. Keywords were selected from relevant literature.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>PAN studies that used ML models and mentioned image quality concerns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 400 articles, 41 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. All the studies used ML models, with 35 papers using deep learning (DL) models. PAN quality assessment was approached in 3 ways: acknowledgement and acceptance of imaging errors in the ML model, removal of low-quality radiographs from the dataset before building the model, and application of image enhancement methods prior to model development. The criteria for determining PAN image quality varied widely across studies and were prone to bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed significant inconsistencies in the management of PAN imaging errors in ML research. However, most studies agree that such errors are detrimental when building ML models. More research is needed to understand the impact of low-quality inputs on model performance. Prospective studies may streamline image quality assessment by leveraging DL models, which excel at pattern recognition tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"165-172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Panoramic imaging errors in machine learning model development: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Delamare, Xingyue Fu, Zimo Huang, Jinman Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twae002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the management of imaging errors from panoramic radiography (PAN) datasets used in the development of machine learning (ML) models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and used three databases. Keywords were selected from relevant literature.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>PAN studies that used ML models and mentioned image quality concerns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 400 articles, 41 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. All the studies used ML models, with 35 papers using deep learning (DL) models. PAN quality assessment was approached in 3 ways: acknowledgement and acceptance of imaging errors in the ML model, removal of low-quality radiographs from the dataset before building the model, and application of image enhancement methods prior to model development. The criteria for determining PAN image quality varied widely across studies and were prone to bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed significant inconsistencies in the management of PAN imaging errors in ML research. However, most studies agree that such errors are detrimental when building ML models. More research is needed to understand the impact of low-quality inputs on model performance. Prospective studies may streamline image quality assessment by leveraging DL models, which excel at pattern recognition tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"165-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003661/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究用于开发机器学习(ML)模型的全景放射摄影(PAN)数据集的成像错误管理:该系统文献遵循《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》,并使用了三个数据库。从相关文献中选取关键词:使用 ML 模型并提及图像质量问题的 PAN 研究:在 400 篇文章中,有 41 篇符合纳入标准。所有研究都使用了 ML 模型,其中 35 篇论文使用了深度学习 (DL) 模型。PAN 质量评估有三种方法:承认并接受 ML 模型中的成像错误;在建立模型前从数据集中删除低质量的放射照片;在模型开发前应用图像增强方法。不同研究对 PAN 图像质量的判定标准差异很大,而且容易产生偏差:本研究揭示了 ML 研究中对 PAN 成像误差管理的严重不一致。然而,大多数研究都认为,在建立 ML 模型时,这种误差是有害的。需要开展更多研究,以了解低质量输入对模型性能的影响。前瞻性研究可以利用擅长模式识别任务的 DL 模型来简化图像质量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Panoramic imaging errors in machine learning model development: a systematic review.

Objectives: To investigate the management of imaging errors from panoramic radiography (PAN) datasets used in the development of machine learning (ML) models.

Methods: This systematic literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and used three databases. Keywords were selected from relevant literature.

Eligibility criteria: PAN studies that used ML models and mentioned image quality concerns.

Results: Out of 400 articles, 41 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. All the studies used ML models, with 35 papers using deep learning (DL) models. PAN quality assessment was approached in 3 ways: acknowledgement and acceptance of imaging errors in the ML model, removal of low-quality radiographs from the dataset before building the model, and application of image enhancement methods prior to model development. The criteria for determining PAN image quality varied widely across studies and were prone to bias.

Conclusions: This study revealed significant inconsistencies in the management of PAN imaging errors in ML research. However, most studies agree that such errors are detrimental when building ML models. More research is needed to understand the impact of low-quality inputs on model performance. Prospective studies may streamline image quality assessment by leveraging DL models, which excel at pattern recognition tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
期刊最新文献
Automated Tooth Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Scans Using Deep Learning. Development and Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model to Reduce Exomass-Related Metal Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography of the Jaws. Preoperative Evaluation of Lingual Cortical Plate Thickness and the Anatomical Relationship of the Lingual Nerve to the Lingual Cortical Plate via 3T MRI Nerve-Bone fusion. Carotid calcifications in panoramic radiographs can predict vascular risk. Preparing for downstream tasks in AI for dental radiology: a baseline performance comparison of deep learning models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1