单核细胞/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和中性粒细胞/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的比率与冠状动脉计算机断层扫描上动脉粥样硬化斑块类型的关系。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Journal of Africa Pub Date : 2024-01-26 DOI:10.5830/CVJA-2023-064
Taha Okan, Caner Topaloglu
{"title":"单核细胞/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和中性粒细胞/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的比率与冠状动脉计算机断层扫描上动脉粥样硬化斑块类型的关系。","authors":"Taha Okan, Caner Topaloglu","doi":"10.5830/CVJA-2023-064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (MHR) and neutrophil/HDL-C ratio (NHR) are markers for inflammation and dyslipidaemia, which are important factors in atherosclerosis. Studies have linked MHR and NHR to the prediction, severity and prognosis of coronary artery disease. However, no study has explored their connection to plaque stability, specifically its calcific or soft/mixed content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monocyte, neutrophil and HDL-C levels were examined in 99 patients who had coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) between January and August 2023. They were divided into three groups: a group of 42 healthy individuals (group 0) with no coronary artery plaque and an Agatson score of 0, an unstable plaque group (group 1) with 31 patients displaying mixed and/or soft plaque on CTA, and a stable plaque group (group 2) with 26 patients showing only calcific plaque.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>White blood cell (WBC), monocyte and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: WBC = 6.31 ± 0.97 × 103 cells/µl, monocytes = 0.40 ± 0.09 × 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl, neutrophils = 3.32 ± 0.81 × 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl; and group 1: WBC = 7.61 ± 1.95 × 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl, monocytes = 0.50 ± 0.11 × 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl, neutrophils = 4.19 ± 1.36 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl; <i>p</i> < 0.05). MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: MHR = 0.0079 ± 0.0029, NHR = 0.063 ± 0.023 and group 1: MHR = 0.0102 ± 0.003, NHR = 0.085 ± 0.036, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significant differences in MHR and NHR between the three groups were due to the differences between groups 0 and 1. MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients, although there was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":9434,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of ratios of monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and neutrophil/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with atherosclerotic plaque type on coronary computed tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Taha Okan, Caner Topaloglu\",\"doi\":\"10.5830/CVJA-2023-064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (MHR) and neutrophil/HDL-C ratio (NHR) are markers for inflammation and dyslipidaemia, which are important factors in atherosclerosis. Studies have linked MHR and NHR to the prediction, severity and prognosis of coronary artery disease. However, no study has explored their connection to plaque stability, specifically its calcific or soft/mixed content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monocyte, neutrophil and HDL-C levels were examined in 99 patients who had coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) between January and August 2023. They were divided into three groups: a group of 42 healthy individuals (group 0) with no coronary artery plaque and an Agatson score of 0, an unstable plaque group (group 1) with 31 patients displaying mixed and/or soft plaque on CTA, and a stable plaque group (group 2) with 26 patients showing only calcific plaque.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>White blood cell (WBC), monocyte and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: WBC = 6.31 ± 0.97 × 103 cells/µl, monocytes = 0.40 ± 0.09 × 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl, neutrophils = 3.32 ± 0.81 × 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl; and group 1: WBC = 7.61 ± 1.95 × 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl, monocytes = 0.50 ± 0.11 × 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl, neutrophils = 4.19 ± 1.36 10<sup>³</sup> cells/µl; <i>p</i> < 0.05). MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: MHR = 0.0079 ± 0.0029, NHR = 0.063 ± 0.023 and group 1: MHR = 0.0102 ± 0.003, NHR = 0.085 ± 0.036, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significant differences in MHR and NHR between the three groups were due to the differences between groups 0 and 1. MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients, although there was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2023-064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2023-064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:单核细胞/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)比率(MHR)和中性粒细胞/HDL-C 比率(NHR)是炎症和血脂异常的标志物,是动脉粥样硬化的重要因素。研究表明,MHR 和 NHR 与冠状动脉疾病的预测、严重程度和预后有关。然而,还没有研究探讨它们与斑块稳定性的关系,特别是斑块的钙化或软/混合物含量:方法:研究人员对 2023 年 1 月至 8 月间接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CTA)的 99 名患者的单核细胞、中性粒细胞和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平进行了检测。他们被分为三组:42 名健康人(0 组),无冠状动脉斑块,Agatson 评分为 0;不稳定斑块组(1 组),31 名患者在 CTA 上显示混合斑块和/或软斑块;稳定斑块组(2 组),26 名患者仅显示钙化斑块:第 1 组患者的白细胞(WBC)、单核细胞和中性粒细胞计数明显高于第 0 组患者(第 0 组:WBC = 6.31 ± 0.97 × 103 cells/µl,单核细胞 = 0.40 ± 0.09 × 10³ 细胞/微升,中性粒细胞 = 3.32 ± 0.81 × 10³ 细胞/微升;第 1 组:WBC = 7.61 ± 1.95 × 10³ 细胞/微升,单核细胞 = 0.50 ± 0.11 × 10³ 细胞/微升,中性粒细胞 = 4.19 ± 1.36 10³ 细胞/微升;P < 0.05)。第 1 组患者的 MHR 和 NHR 明显高于第 0 组患者(第 0 组:MHR = 0.0079 ± 0.0029,NHR = 0.063 ± 0.023;第 1 组:MHR = 0.0102 ± 0.003,NHR = 0.085 ± 0.036,P < 0.05):第 1 组患者的 MHR 和 NHR 明显高于第 1 组,但第 1 组和第 2 组之间的差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of ratios of monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and neutrophil/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with atherosclerotic plaque type on coronary computed tomography.

Objectives: The monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (MHR) and neutrophil/HDL-C ratio (NHR) are markers for inflammation and dyslipidaemia, which are important factors in atherosclerosis. Studies have linked MHR and NHR to the prediction, severity and prognosis of coronary artery disease. However, no study has explored their connection to plaque stability, specifically its calcific or soft/mixed content.

Methods: Monocyte, neutrophil and HDL-C levels were examined in 99 patients who had coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) between January and August 2023. They were divided into three groups: a group of 42 healthy individuals (group 0) with no coronary artery plaque and an Agatson score of 0, an unstable plaque group (group 1) with 31 patients displaying mixed and/or soft plaque on CTA, and a stable plaque group (group 2) with 26 patients showing only calcific plaque.

Results: White blood cell (WBC), monocyte and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: WBC = 6.31 ± 0.97 × 103 cells/µl, monocytes = 0.40 ± 0.09 × 10³ cells/µl, neutrophils = 3.32 ± 0.81 × 10³ cells/µl; and group 1: WBC = 7.61 ± 1.95 × 10³ cells/µl, monocytes = 0.50 ± 0.11 × 10³ cells/µl, neutrophils = 4.19 ± 1.36 10³ cells/µl; p < 0.05). MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: MHR = 0.0079 ± 0.0029, NHR = 0.063 ± 0.023 and group 1: MHR = 0.0102 ± 0.003, NHR = 0.085 ± 0.036, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The significant differences in MHR and NHR between the three groups were due to the differences between groups 0 and 1. MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients, although there was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Journal of Africa
Cardiovascular Journal of Africa CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cardiovascular Journal of Africa (CVJA) is an international peer-reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include coronary disease, electrophysiology, valve disease, imaging techniques, congenital heart disease (fetal, paediatric and adult), heart failure, surgery, and basic science.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in patients' understanding of cardiovascular disease management. High intracardiac clot burden in a young mother with peripartum cardiomyopathy in Uganda. The temporal relationship between body composition and cardiometabolic profiles in an HIV-infected (on antiretroviral therapy) versus HIV-free Western Cape study population. Evaluation of cardiac function in paediatric Wilson's disease patients with advanced echocardiographic modalities (strain and strain rate echocardiography). The role of C-reactive protein:albumin ratio and Neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio in predicting coronary artery disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1