口外三维扫描在牙科修复体开发中的精度分析。

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Acta Stomatologica Croatica Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.15644/asc57/4/5
Marija Trpčić, Marija Majda Perišić, Fanika Lukačević, Stanko Škec
{"title":"口外三维扫描在牙科修复体开发中的精度分析。","authors":"Marija Trpčić, Marija Majda Perišić, Fanika Lukačević, Stanko Škec","doi":"10.15644/asc57/4/5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study has evaluated the accuracy (trueness and precision) of seven extraoral scanners when scanning two different types of jaws: simplified jaw with sharp edges and abutments and realistic jaw with natural teeth. The accuracies of extraoral scanners were compared, and their compliance with the required clinical accuracy levels was discussed.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten scans were made with each scanner for both models. The comparison of the selected dental scanners relied on reference scans made for both models. Trueness, precision, and the distribution and value of laboratory scan points' deviations were assessed for each scanner across the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trueness for the model of the simplified jaw with abutments ranged from 16.15 to 49.78 μm. The measured precision values for the same model ranged from 4.33 to 29.49 μm. For the model of the realistic jaw with natural teeth, the trueness results ranged from 11.32 to 24.55 μm, while the obtained precision values were between 2.29 and 18.06 μm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The revealed dissimilarities in the accuracies of scanners and their ranking when scanning different models lead to the conclusion that model selection is critical for the research design. All the scanners met the clinical accuracy requirements and are suitable for use in laboratories for scanning jaws with abutments and jaws with natural teeth. However, the accuracy values reported by the manufacturers of scanners are better than those obtained in this study. Furthermore, the results suggested that blue light scanners outperform white light and laser scanners.</p>","PeriodicalId":7154,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10812911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy Analysis of Extraoral 3D Scanning in the Development of Dental Prosthetic.\",\"authors\":\"Marija Trpčić, Marija Majda Perišić, Fanika Lukačević, Stanko Škec\",\"doi\":\"10.15644/asc57/4/5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study has evaluated the accuracy (trueness and precision) of seven extraoral scanners when scanning two different types of jaws: simplified jaw with sharp edges and abutments and realistic jaw with natural teeth. The accuracies of extraoral scanners were compared, and their compliance with the required clinical accuracy levels was discussed.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten scans were made with each scanner for both models. The comparison of the selected dental scanners relied on reference scans made for both models. Trueness, precision, and the distribution and value of laboratory scan points' deviations were assessed for each scanner across the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trueness for the model of the simplified jaw with abutments ranged from 16.15 to 49.78 μm. The measured precision values for the same model ranged from 4.33 to 29.49 μm. For the model of the realistic jaw with natural teeth, the trueness results ranged from 11.32 to 24.55 μm, while the obtained precision values were between 2.29 and 18.06 μm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The revealed dissimilarities in the accuracies of scanners and their ranking when scanning different models lead to the conclusion that model selection is critical for the research design. All the scanners met the clinical accuracy requirements and are suitable for use in laboratories for scanning jaws with abutments and jaws with natural teeth. However, the accuracy values reported by the manufacturers of scanners are better than those obtained in this study. Furthermore, the results suggested that blue light scanners outperform white light and laser scanners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Stomatologica Croatica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10812911/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Stomatologica Croatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc57/4/5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc57/4/5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的研究评估了七台口外扫描仪在扫描两种不同类型颌骨时的准确度(真实度和精确度):带有尖锐边缘和基台的简化颌骨和带有自然牙齿的真实颌骨。比较了口外扫描仪的准确度,并讨论了它们是否符合所要求的临床准确度水平:每种扫描仪对两种模型各进行 10 次扫描。所选牙科扫描仪的比较依赖于两种模型的参考扫描。对每台扫描仪的真实度、精确度以及实验室扫描点偏差的分布和数值进行了评估:带基台的简化下颌模型的真实度范围为 16.15 至 49.78 μm。同一模型的测量精度值介于 4.33 至 29.49 μm 之间。对于带有天然牙齿的真实颌骨模型,真实度结果介于 11.32 至 24.55 μm 之间,而获得的精度值介于 2.29 至 18.06 μm 之间:在扫描不同模型时,所发现的扫描仪精确度的差异及其排名情况使我们得出结论,模型的选择对研究设计至关重要。所有扫描仪都符合临床精度要求,适合在实验室中用于扫描带基台的颌骨和带天然牙齿的颌骨。不过,扫描仪制造商报告的精确度值要优于本研究获得的精确度值。此外,研究结果表明蓝光扫描仪的性能优于白光和激光扫描仪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy Analysis of Extraoral 3D Scanning in the Development of Dental Prosthetic.

Objective: The study has evaluated the accuracy (trueness and precision) of seven extraoral scanners when scanning two different types of jaws: simplified jaw with sharp edges and abutments and realistic jaw with natural teeth. The accuracies of extraoral scanners were compared, and their compliance with the required clinical accuracy levels was discussed.

Material and methods: Ten scans were made with each scanner for both models. The comparison of the selected dental scanners relied on reference scans made for both models. Trueness, precision, and the distribution and value of laboratory scan points' deviations were assessed for each scanner across the models.

Results: The trueness for the model of the simplified jaw with abutments ranged from 16.15 to 49.78 μm. The measured precision values for the same model ranged from 4.33 to 29.49 μm. For the model of the realistic jaw with natural teeth, the trueness results ranged from 11.32 to 24.55 μm, while the obtained precision values were between 2.29 and 18.06 μm.

Conclusion: The revealed dissimilarities in the accuracies of scanners and their ranking when scanning different models lead to the conclusion that model selection is critical for the research design. All the scanners met the clinical accuracy requirements and are suitable for use in laboratories for scanning jaws with abutments and jaws with natural teeth. However, the accuracy values reported by the manufacturers of scanners are better than those obtained in this study. Furthermore, the results suggested that blue light scanners outperform white light and laser scanners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Acta Stomatologica Croatica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Stomatologica Croatica (ASCRO) is a leading scientific non-profit journal in the field of dental, oral and cranio-facial sciences during the past 44 years in Croatia. ASCRO publishes original scientific and clinical papers, preliminary communications, case reports, book reviews, letters to the editor and news. Review articles are published by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief by acclaimed professionals in distinct fields of dental medicine. All manuscripts are subjected to peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Tooth Shade Measurement Precision and Consistency with Digital Photography Calibration System. Clinical Survival of Reduced-Thickness Monolithic Lithium-Disilicate Crowns: A 3-Year Randomized Controlled Trial. Dental Anxiety Among Students of the University of Rijeka, Croatia. Evaluation of Sella Turcica Variations in Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs and its Association with Malocclusion. Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Resin and Calcium Silicate Based Sealers Removal in Mandibular Molars Curved Canals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1