英国的人工耳蜗转诊模式表明,老年人在使用人工耳蜗方面存在不公平现象;在五个听力中心进行试点审核的结果。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2023.2298751
Helen Cullington, Ann-Marie Dickinson, Unai Martinez de Estibariz, Joseph Blackaby, Lisa Kennedy, Katie McNeill, Sara O'Neill
{"title":"英国的人工耳蜗转诊模式表明,老年人在使用人工耳蜗方面存在不公平现象;在五个听力中心进行试点审核的结果。","authors":"Helen Cullington, Ann-Marie Dickinson, Unai Martinez de Estibariz, Joseph Blackaby, Lisa Kennedy, Katie McNeill, Sara O'Neill","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2298751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use a standardised reporting tool to identify potential eligible candidates for cochlear implant (CI) referral and quantify the proportion of adults who had a CI referral discussion after presenting with an audiogram within United Kingdom (UK) audiometric criteria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective multicentre 6-month audit of Audiology clinic databases.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>A total of 810 adults from five geographically diverse UK Audiology sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected in late 2019 after UK CI audiometric candidacy criteria changed; one site collected only 3 months of data. The proportion of potential eligible adults (based only on audiometry) considered for CI referral was 64% (521 out of 810) and varied by site (from 50% to 83%). About 24% of patients (123 out of 521) declined CI referral; this also varied across sites (12-45%). The median age of patients where CI referral was not considered was 80 years - significantly higher than the group where CI referral was considered (73 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CI referral is dependent on where adults live, and how old they are. Older adults are significantly less likely to be considered for CI referral by Audiologists. Audiology clinics need more support to empower staff to talk to patients about CI referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"853-858"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear implant referral patterns in the UK suggest a postcode lottery with inequitable access for older adults; results of a pilot audit in five Audiology sites.\",\"authors\":\"Helen Cullington, Ann-Marie Dickinson, Unai Martinez de Estibariz, Joseph Blackaby, Lisa Kennedy, Katie McNeill, Sara O'Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2023.2298751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use a standardised reporting tool to identify potential eligible candidates for cochlear implant (CI) referral and quantify the proportion of adults who had a CI referral discussion after presenting with an audiogram within United Kingdom (UK) audiometric criteria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective multicentre 6-month audit of Audiology clinic databases.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>A total of 810 adults from five geographically diverse UK Audiology sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected in late 2019 after UK CI audiometric candidacy criteria changed; one site collected only 3 months of data. The proportion of potential eligible adults (based only on audiometry) considered for CI referral was 64% (521 out of 810) and varied by site (from 50% to 83%). About 24% of patients (123 out of 521) declined CI referral; this also varied across sites (12-45%). The median age of patients where CI referral was not considered was 80 years - significantly higher than the group where CI referral was considered (73 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CI referral is dependent on where adults live, and how old they are. Older adults are significantly less likely to be considered for CI referral by Audiologists. Audiology clinics need more support to empower staff to talk to patients about CI referral.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"853-858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2023.2298751\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2023.2298751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用标准化报告工具确定潜在的符合人工耳蜗转诊条件的患者,并量化在听力图符合英国标准后进行人工耳蜗转诊讨论的成人比例:使用标准化报告工具确定潜在的符合人工耳蜗植入(CI)转诊条件的候选人,并量化在听力图符合英国(UK)听力标准后进行 CI 转诊讨论的成人比例:研究样本:研究样本:来自英国五个地理位置不同的听力学诊所的共810名成年人:数据收集于英国 CI 听力测量候选标准改变后的 2019 年底;其中一个站点仅收集了 3 个月的数据。被考虑转诊为 CI 的潜在合格成人比例为 64%(810 人中有 521 人)(仅基于测听结果),各医疗点的比例有所不同(从 50% 到 83%)。约 24% 的患者(521 人中有 123 人)拒绝接受 CI 转诊;这一比例在不同地区也存在差异(12%-45%)。未考虑转诊 CI 的患者年龄中位数为 80 岁,明显高于考虑转诊 CI 的患者(73 岁):CI转诊取决于成年人的居住地和年龄。听力学家考虑转诊 CI 的老年人明显较少。听力诊所需要更多支持,以增强员工与患者讨论 CI 转诊的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cochlear implant referral patterns in the UK suggest a postcode lottery with inequitable access for older adults; results of a pilot audit in five Audiology sites.

Objective: To use a standardised reporting tool to identify potential eligible candidates for cochlear implant (CI) referral and quantify the proportion of adults who had a CI referral discussion after presenting with an audiogram within United Kingdom (UK) audiometric criteria.

Design: Retrospective multicentre 6-month audit of Audiology clinic databases.

Study sample: A total of 810 adults from five geographically diverse UK Audiology sites.

Results: Data were collected in late 2019 after UK CI audiometric candidacy criteria changed; one site collected only 3 months of data. The proportion of potential eligible adults (based only on audiometry) considered for CI referral was 64% (521 out of 810) and varied by site (from 50% to 83%). About 24% of patients (123 out of 521) declined CI referral; this also varied across sites (12-45%). The median age of patients where CI referral was not considered was 80 years - significantly higher than the group where CI referral was considered (73 years).

Conclusions: CI referral is dependent on where adults live, and how old they are. Older adults are significantly less likely to be considered for CI referral by Audiologists. Audiology clinics need more support to empower staff to talk to patients about CI referral.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
The influence of age and hearing loss on thresholds measured using the TFS-AF test. Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1