在接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的患者中使用氯胺酮-丙泊酚镇静:与全身麻醉的对比回顾性研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Current vascular pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0115701611274790231221044147
Nurdan Yilmaz, Yasar Gokhan Gul, Murat Ugurlucan
{"title":"在接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的患者中使用氯胺酮-丙泊酚镇静:与全身麻醉的对比回顾性研究。","authors":"Nurdan Yilmaz, Yasar Gokhan Gul, Murat Ugurlucan","doi":"10.2174/0115701611274790231221044147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is used for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgery. Since these patients are elderly and have comorbidities, their management is of great importance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective study compares two anesthesia techniques during TAVI: sedation (ketamine and propofol) and general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI during 2021 in our hospital were retrospectively screened. Demographic data, comorbidities, anesthesia management, complications, and mortality of the patients were obtained from the records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 137 patients treated with TAVI; 74 (54%) patients had sedation and 63 (46%) had general anesthesia. When the anesthesia management was evaluated, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the patients who received general anesthesia and sedation. After univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate factors having an impact on mortality, anemia (only in univariate analysis) in the whole study population was a statistically significant risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing TAVI (p<0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in mortality in terms of anesthesia management. Anemia was a risk factor for mortality (only in univariate analysis) in the whole study population. We concluded that conscious sedation with ketamine and propofol is effective and safe for TAVI procedures compared to general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11278,"journal":{"name":"Current vascular pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedation with Ketamine-Propofol in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Comparative Retrospective Study on General Anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Nurdan Yilmaz, Yasar Gokhan Gul, Murat Ugurlucan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115701611274790231221044147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is used for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgery. Since these patients are elderly and have comorbidities, their management is of great importance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective study compares two anesthesia techniques during TAVI: sedation (ketamine and propofol) and general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI during 2021 in our hospital were retrospectively screened. Demographic data, comorbidities, anesthesia management, complications, and mortality of the patients were obtained from the records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 137 patients treated with TAVI; 74 (54%) patients had sedation and 63 (46%) had general anesthesia. When the anesthesia management was evaluated, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the patients who received general anesthesia and sedation. After univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate factors having an impact on mortality, anemia (only in univariate analysis) in the whole study population was a statistically significant risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing TAVI (p<0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in mortality in terms of anesthesia management. Anemia was a risk factor for mortality (only in univariate analysis) in the whole study population. We concluded that conscious sedation with ketamine and propofol is effective and safe for TAVI procedures compared to general anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current vascular pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current vascular pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611274790231221044147\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611274790231221044147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)用于手术风险较高的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者。由于这些患者年事已高且有合并症,因此对他们的管理非常重要:这项回顾性研究比较了 TAVI 期间的两种麻醉技术:镇静(氯胺酮和异丙酚)和全身麻醉:回顾性筛选了 2021 年期间在我院接受 TAVI 手术的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者。从病历中获取患者的人口统计学数据、合并症、麻醉管理、并发症和死亡率:共有137名患者接受了TAVI治疗,其中74人(54%)使用了镇静剂,63人(46%)使用了全身麻醉。对麻醉管理进行评估后发现,接受全身麻醉和镇静的患者死亡率无明显差异。在对影响死亡率的因素进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析后发现,在所有研究人群中,贫血(仅在单变量分析中)是导致 TAVI 患者死亡的一个具有统计学意义的风险因素(p 结论:在所有研究人群中,贫血(仅在单变量分析中)是导致 TAVI 患者死亡的一个具有统计学意义的风险因素(p 结论:在所有研究人群中,贫血(仅在单变量分析中)是导致 TAVI 患者死亡的一个具有统计学意义的风险因素:在麻醉管理方面,死亡率没有明显差异。在整个研究人群中,贫血是死亡率的一个风险因素(仅在单变量分析中)。我们的结论是,与全身麻醉相比,使用氯胺酮和异丙酚进行有意识镇静对 TAVI 手术有效且安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sedation with Ketamine-Propofol in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Comparative Retrospective Study on General Anesthesia.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is used for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgery. Since these patients are elderly and have comorbidities, their management is of great importance.

Objectives: This retrospective study compares two anesthesia techniques during TAVI: sedation (ketamine and propofol) and general anesthesia.

Methods: Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI during 2021 in our hospital were retrospectively screened. Demographic data, comorbidities, anesthesia management, complications, and mortality of the patients were obtained from the records.

Results: There were 137 patients treated with TAVI; 74 (54%) patients had sedation and 63 (46%) had general anesthesia. When the anesthesia management was evaluated, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the patients who received general anesthesia and sedation. After univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate factors having an impact on mortality, anemia (only in univariate analysis) in the whole study population was a statistically significant risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing TAVI (p<0.014).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in mortality in terms of anesthesia management. Anemia was a risk factor for mortality (only in univariate analysis) in the whole study population. We concluded that conscious sedation with ketamine and propofol is effective and safe for TAVI procedures compared to general anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current vascular pharmacology
Current vascular pharmacology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Vascular Pharmacology publishes clinical and research-based reviews/mini-reviews, original research articles, letters, debates, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues to update all those concerned with the treatment of vascular disease, bridging the gap between clinical practice and ongoing research. Vascular disease is the commonest cause of death in Westernized countries and its incidence is on the increase in developing countries. It follows that considerable research is directed at establishing effective treatment for acute vascular events. Long-term treatment has also received considerable attention (e.g. for symptomatic relief). Furthermore, effective prevention, whether primary or secondary, is backed by the findings of several landmark trials. Vascular disease is a complex field with primary care physicians and nurse practitioners as well as several specialties involved. The latter include cardiology, vascular and cardio thoracic surgery, general medicine, radiology, clinical pharmacology and neurology (stroke units).
期刊最新文献
Rare Endocrine Disorders and Peripheral Arterial Disease. Where to Next after BASIL-2 and BEST-CLI? Current Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Prevention and Management: Taming the Commonest Cardiac Arrhythmia. Delineating the NOX-Mediated Promising Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Various Cardiovascular Disorders: A Comprehensive Review. Comparison of Amiodarone Loading Dosage in the Treatment of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation: High Versus Standard Dose Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1