评估熏蒸剂和非熏蒸剂杀线虫剂对甘薯上轮枝菌(Rotylenchulus reniformis)的管理效果。

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Journal of nematology Pub Date : 2023-01-24 eCollection Date: 2023-02-01 DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0061
Tristan T Watson, Caleb S Hamm, J Cole Gregorie
{"title":"评估熏蒸剂和非熏蒸剂杀线虫剂对甘薯上轮枝菌(Rotylenchulus reniformis)的管理效果。","authors":"Tristan T Watson, Caleb S Hamm, J Cole Gregorie","doi":"10.2478/jofnem-2023-0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reniform nematode (<i>Rotylenchulus reniformis</i>) is a major pest of sweetpotato in many production regions in Southern United States. Applying soil fumigants and non-fumigant nematicides are the primary management strategies available to growers. This study compared the relative efficacy of nematicides (1,3-dichloropropene, fluopyram, oxamyl, fluazaindolizine, aldicarb, Majestene, and fluensulfone) for management of reniform nematode on sweetpotato. Fumigating soil with 1,3-dichloropropene consistently reduced soil population densities of reniform nematode at the time of planting in both trial years (31 - 36% reduction relative to the untreated control); however, the duration of suppression varied greatly by growing season. A similar trend was observed with fluopyram (56 - 67% reduction) and aldicarb (63 - 65% reduction), which provided season-long suppression of reniform nematode population development in 2021 but had no impact in 2022. In 2021, nematicide application had no impact on yield; however, in 2022, oxamyl and aldicarb increased the yield of U.S.#1 grade sweetpotato. Overall, soil fumigation with 1,3-dichloropropene and in-furrow application of fluopyram and aldicarb provided the most consistent suppression of reniform nematode on sweetpotato.</p>","PeriodicalId":16475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10817821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of fumigant and non-fumigant nematicides for management of <i>Rotylenchulus reniformis</i> on sweetpotato.\",\"authors\":\"Tristan T Watson, Caleb S Hamm, J Cole Gregorie\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jofnem-2023-0061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reniform nematode (<i>Rotylenchulus reniformis</i>) is a major pest of sweetpotato in many production regions in Southern United States. Applying soil fumigants and non-fumigant nematicides are the primary management strategies available to growers. This study compared the relative efficacy of nematicides (1,3-dichloropropene, fluopyram, oxamyl, fluazaindolizine, aldicarb, Majestene, and fluensulfone) for management of reniform nematode on sweetpotato. Fumigating soil with 1,3-dichloropropene consistently reduced soil population densities of reniform nematode at the time of planting in both trial years (31 - 36% reduction relative to the untreated control); however, the duration of suppression varied greatly by growing season. A similar trend was observed with fluopyram (56 - 67% reduction) and aldicarb (63 - 65% reduction), which provided season-long suppression of reniform nematode population development in 2021 but had no impact in 2022. In 2021, nematicide application had no impact on yield; however, in 2022, oxamyl and aldicarb increased the yield of U.S.#1 grade sweetpotato. Overall, soil fumigation with 1,3-dichloropropene and in-furrow application of fluopyram and aldicarb provided the most consistent suppression of reniform nematode on sweetpotato.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10817821/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nematology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾形线虫(Rotylenchulus reniformis)是美国南部许多生产地区甘薯的主要害虫。施用土壤熏蒸剂和非熏蒸杀线虫剂是种植者可采用的主要管理策略。这项研究比较了杀线虫剂(1,3-二氯丙烯、氟吡脲、恶虫威、氟唑啉、涕灭威、Majestene 和氟磺胺)对甘薯肾形线虫的相对防治效果。在两个试验年中,用 1,3-二氯丙烯熏蒸土壤可持续降低种植时土壤中肾形线虫的种群密度(与未处理的对照组相比,降低了 31 - 36%);然而,抑制作用的持续时间因生长季节的不同而有很大差异。氟吡草胺(减少 56 - 67%)和涕灭威(减少 63 - 65%)也出现了类似的趋势,在 2021 年,这两种杀线虫剂对肾形线虫种群发展的抑制作用持续了一个季节,但在 2022 年却没有任何影响。2021 年,施用杀线虫剂对产量没有影响;但 2022 年,肟菌酯和涕灭威提高了美国 1 号甘薯的产量。总体而言,用 1,3-二氯丙烯进行土壤熏蒸以及在垄内施用氟吡甲禾灵和涕灭威可最稳定地抑制甘薯上的肾形线虫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of fumigant and non-fumigant nematicides for management of Rotylenchulus reniformis on sweetpotato.

Reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) is a major pest of sweetpotato in many production regions in Southern United States. Applying soil fumigants and non-fumigant nematicides are the primary management strategies available to growers. This study compared the relative efficacy of nematicides (1,3-dichloropropene, fluopyram, oxamyl, fluazaindolizine, aldicarb, Majestene, and fluensulfone) for management of reniform nematode on sweetpotato. Fumigating soil with 1,3-dichloropropene consistently reduced soil population densities of reniform nematode at the time of planting in both trial years (31 - 36% reduction relative to the untreated control); however, the duration of suppression varied greatly by growing season. A similar trend was observed with fluopyram (56 - 67% reduction) and aldicarb (63 - 65% reduction), which provided season-long suppression of reniform nematode population development in 2021 but had no impact in 2022. In 2021, nematicide application had no impact on yield; however, in 2022, oxamyl and aldicarb increased the yield of U.S.#1 grade sweetpotato. Overall, soil fumigation with 1,3-dichloropropene and in-furrow application of fluopyram and aldicarb provided the most consistent suppression of reniform nematode on sweetpotato.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of nematology
Journal of nematology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nematology is the official technical and scientific communication publication of the Society of Nematologists since 1969. The journal publishes original papers on all aspects of basic, applied, descriptive, theoretical or experimental nematology and adheres to strict peer-review policy. Other categories of papers include invited reviews, research notes, abstracts of papers presented at annual meetings, and special publications as appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Vacuum and Steam Heat to Eliminate Pinewood Nematodes in Naturally Infested Whole Pine Logs. Description of two new Pristionchus species from South Korea. Description and Molecular Characterization of a New Dorylaimid Nematode, Mesodorylaimus pini n. sp. (Nematoda: Dorylaimidae) from Korea. JON 63rd Meeting 2024 Park City ABSTRACTS. Nematode genome announcement: A chromosome-scale genome assembly for the Pristionchus pacificus reference mapping strain PS1843.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1