治疗膝关节骨关节炎的十六烷基化脂肪酸口服制剂与美洛昔康的比较:随机临床试验

Q4 Medicine Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2023-08-22 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.31138/mjr.220823.aof
Sepide Mohebi, Hamid Reza Farpour, Kayvon Seyed Dehghanian, Sana Sadat Khoshnazar
{"title":"治疗膝关节骨关节炎的十六烷基化脂肪酸口服制剂与美洛昔康的比较:随机临床试验","authors":"Sepide Mohebi, Hamid Reza Farpour, Kayvon Seyed Dehghanian, Sana Sadat Khoshnazar","doi":"10.31138/mjr.220823.aof","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective/aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess how effective an oral form of Cetylated fatty acids compounds (CFA) is in improving the physical function, pain, and stiffness of individuals suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA) and how its effectiveness compares to that of Meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this parallel-arm randomised clinical trial, 48 adult patients with knee OA were divided into two groups. The intervention group was prescribed 350mg CFA capsule three times per day for 30 days. The control group was given 15mg of Meloxicam, one tablet daily for ten days. Patients were instructed to fill out the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were obtained before the administration of the first dose (considered baseline or t<sub>0</sub>), and two (t<sub>1</sub>), four (t<sub>2</sub>), and eight (t<sub>3</sub>) weeks after the final dose of each intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in total WOMAC and OKS scores between the two groups at t<sub>1</sub>, t<sub>2</sub>, or t<sub>3</sub>. However, both groups had significant improvements in their OKS, VAS, and total WOMAC scores compared to their baselines (t<sub>0</sub>). No adverse events were noted in the CFA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improvements in pain intensity and overall physical function were reported in the CFA group. Oral CFAs could safely benefit patients with knee OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":32816,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"34 4","pages":"460-468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10815532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Oral Form of Cetylated Fatty Acids versus Meloxicam for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomised Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sepide Mohebi, Hamid Reza Farpour, Kayvon Seyed Dehghanian, Sana Sadat Khoshnazar\",\"doi\":\"10.31138/mjr.220823.aof\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective/aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess how effective an oral form of Cetylated fatty acids compounds (CFA) is in improving the physical function, pain, and stiffness of individuals suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA) and how its effectiveness compares to that of Meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this parallel-arm randomised clinical trial, 48 adult patients with knee OA were divided into two groups. The intervention group was prescribed 350mg CFA capsule three times per day for 30 days. The control group was given 15mg of Meloxicam, one tablet daily for ten days. Patients were instructed to fill out the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were obtained before the administration of the first dose (considered baseline or t<sub>0</sub>), and two (t<sub>1</sub>), four (t<sub>2</sub>), and eight (t<sub>3</sub>) weeks after the final dose of each intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in total WOMAC and OKS scores between the two groups at t<sub>1</sub>, t<sub>2</sub>, or t<sub>3</sub>. However, both groups had significant improvements in their OKS, VAS, and total WOMAC scores compared to their baselines (t<sub>0</sub>). No adverse events were noted in the CFA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improvements in pain intensity and overall physical function were reported in the CFA group. Oral CFAs could safely benefit patients with knee OA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"460-468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10815532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.220823.aof\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.220823.aof","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/意义:本研究旨在评估一种口服形式的十六烷基化脂肪酸化合物(CFA)在改善膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的身体功能、疼痛和僵硬程度方面的效果,以及它与非类固醇消炎药(NSAID)美洛昔康的效果比较:在这项平行臂随机临床试验中,48 名患有膝关节 OA 的成年患者被分为两组。干预组服用 350 毫克 CFA 胶囊,每天三次,持续 30 天。对照组服用 15 毫克美洛昔康,每天一片,持续 10 天。指导患者填写牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)。数据采集于首次用药前(视为基线或t0),以及最后一次用药后的两周(t1)、四周(t2)和八周(t3):两组患者在 t1、t2 或 t3 期的 WOMAC 和 OKS 总分均无明显差异。不过,与基线(t0)相比,两组的 OKS、VAS 和 WOMAC 总分均有明显改善。CFA组未发现任何不良反应:结论:CFA组患者的疼痛强度和整体身体功能均有所改善。口服 CFA 可以使膝关节 OA 患者安全获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Oral Form of Cetylated Fatty Acids versus Meloxicam for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Objective/aim: This study aimed to assess how effective an oral form of Cetylated fatty acids compounds (CFA) is in improving the physical function, pain, and stiffness of individuals suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA) and how its effectiveness compares to that of Meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).

Methods: For this parallel-arm randomised clinical trial, 48 adult patients with knee OA were divided into two groups. The intervention group was prescribed 350mg CFA capsule three times per day for 30 days. The control group was given 15mg of Meloxicam, one tablet daily for ten days. Patients were instructed to fill out the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were obtained before the administration of the first dose (considered baseline or t0), and two (t1), four (t2), and eight (t3) weeks after the final dose of each intervention.

Results: No significant differences were observed in total WOMAC and OKS scores between the two groups at t1, t2, or t3. However, both groups had significant improvements in their OKS, VAS, and total WOMAC scores compared to their baselines (t0). No adverse events were noted in the CFA group.

Conclusion: Improvements in pain intensity and overall physical function were reported in the CFA group. Oral CFAs could safely benefit patients with knee OA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sulfasalazine-Induced Agranulocytosis: A Case Series and Review of Literature. The Effect of Lupus on Pregnancy and the Foetus: Should we really be Worried? A Single-Centre Retrospective Study. Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Considerations on Assessment and Management. Clinical Outcomes and Patients' Perspectives of Multidisciplinary Psoriasis Management: A Five-Year Retrospective Study. Elderly Onset Spondyloarthropathy and VEXAS Syndrome: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1