{"title":"使用超声波去除硬件。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.01.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Osteosynthesis hardware removal is one of the most frequent practices in Orthopedic electives surgeries and is usually carried out guided under fluoroscopy. There are other tools such as ultrasound that allow us to visualize the hardware with the advantage of being free of ionizing radiation and with better availability. The objective of our study is to analyze the results obtained in patients undergoing hardware removal in the operating room under ultrasound assistance and local anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A descriptive study was carried out collecting variables such as demographic data, reason for the removal, pain during the procedure and in subsequent days, as well as the duration and rate of success of the procedure and the degree of satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We obtained a 100% success in ultrasound-guided extraction without the need for conventional radiology, with a mean VAS of 1.91 and need for subsequent analgesia in 36.4% of the cases, with syndesmotic dynamization being the most frequent reason for intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Ultrasound is a useful tool in osteosynthesis hardware removal, and that may be sufficient by itself; also saving health personnel and patients from ionizing radiation resulting from the use of conventional fluoroscopy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":"68 5","pages":"Pages 482-489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441524000468/pdfft?md5=855aac777cf9dd91be6143ea55cb4928&pid=1-s2.0-S1888441524000468-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La ecografía como herramienta para la extracción de material de osteosíntesis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.recot.2024.01.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Osteosynthesis hardware removal is one of the most frequent practices in Orthopedic electives surgeries and is usually carried out guided under fluoroscopy. There are other tools such as ultrasound that allow us to visualize the hardware with the advantage of being free of ionizing radiation and with better availability. The objective of our study is to analyze the results obtained in patients undergoing hardware removal in the operating room under ultrasound assistance and local anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A descriptive study was carried out collecting variables such as demographic data, reason for the removal, pain during the procedure and in subsequent days, as well as the duration and rate of success of the procedure and the degree of satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We obtained a 100% success in ultrasound-guided extraction without the need for conventional radiology, with a mean VAS of 1.91 and need for subsequent analgesia in 36.4% of the cases, with syndesmotic dynamization being the most frequent reason for intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Ultrasound is a useful tool in osteosynthesis hardware removal, and that may be sufficient by itself; also saving health personnel and patients from ionizing radiation resulting from the use of conventional fluoroscopy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"volume\":\"68 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 482-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441524000468/pdfft?md5=855aac777cf9dd91be6143ea55cb4928&pid=1-s2.0-S1888441524000468-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441524000468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441524000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:骨合成硬件移除是骨科择期手术中最常见的做法之一,通常在透视引导下进行。还有一些其他工具,如超声波,可以让我们直观地看到硬件,其优点是无电离辐射,可用性更好。我们的研究目的是分析在超声波辅助和局部麻醉下,在手术室进行硬件切除的患者所获得的结果。材料和方法:我们进行了一项描述性研究,收集了人口统计学数据、切除原因、手术过程中和随后几天的疼痛、手术持续时间和成功率以及满意度等变量。结果:我们在超声引导下拔除的成功率为 100%,无需进行传统放射学检查,平均 VAS 值为 1.91,36.4% 的病例需要进行后续镇痛,最常见的干预原因是联合韧带动力化。
La ecografía como herramienta para la extracción de material de osteosíntesis
Introduction
Osteosynthesis hardware removal is one of the most frequent practices in Orthopedic electives surgeries and is usually carried out guided under fluoroscopy. There are other tools such as ultrasound that allow us to visualize the hardware with the advantage of being free of ionizing radiation and with better availability. The objective of our study is to analyze the results obtained in patients undergoing hardware removal in the operating room under ultrasound assistance and local anesthesia.
Material and methods
A descriptive study was carried out collecting variables such as demographic data, reason for the removal, pain during the procedure and in subsequent days, as well as the duration and rate of success of the procedure and the degree of satisfaction.
Results
We obtained a 100% success in ultrasound-guided extraction without the need for conventional radiology, with a mean VAS of 1.91 and need for subsequent analgesia in 36.4% of the cases, with syndesmotic dynamization being the most frequent reason for intervention.
Conclusion
Ultrasound is a useful tool in osteosynthesis hardware removal, and that may be sufficient by itself; also saving health personnel and patients from ionizing radiation resulting from the use of conventional fluoroscopy.
期刊介绍:
Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.