在门诊环境中实施围产期药物使用筛查方案。

Kristine DiCarlo, Lisa Whiffen
{"title":"在门诊环境中实施围产期药物使用筛查方案。","authors":"Kristine DiCarlo,&nbsp;Lisa Whiffen","doi":"10.1016/j.nwh.2023.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To implement the 5Ps Screen for Alcohol/Substance Use tool and the screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) process into clinical practice to determine if enhanced training would improve perinatal providers’ adherence to universal screening.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A quality improvement project using a pre- and postintervention design.</p></div><div><h3>Setting/Local Problem</h3><p>Three community-based, outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics in southeastern Massachusetts. The local problem identified was that no validated screening tool was being used for universal screening of substance use in pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions/Measurements</h3><p>Training consisted of two phases that reviewed the SBIRT process, the 5Ps screening tool, brief intervention conversations, and the process for referral to treatment. Pre- and postimplementation screening rates were compared and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests of independence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Preimplementation screening rates were 14.4%. Screening rates measured 1 month after implementation were 44.6% (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). Universal screening was not achieved.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Short-term improvement in screening for perinatal substance use was observed. Whether these results are sustainable beyond the project time frame is unknown. Future work should examine longer-term outcomes and continued barriers to universal uptake of the screening protocol.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39985,"journal":{"name":"Nursing for Women''s Health","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 101-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a Perinatal Substance Use Screening Protocol in the Outpatient Setting\",\"authors\":\"Kristine DiCarlo,&nbsp;Lisa Whiffen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nwh.2023.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To implement the 5Ps Screen for Alcohol/Substance Use tool and the screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) process into clinical practice to determine if enhanced training would improve perinatal providers’ adherence to universal screening.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A quality improvement project using a pre- and postintervention design.</p></div><div><h3>Setting/Local Problem</h3><p>Three community-based, outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics in southeastern Massachusetts. The local problem identified was that no validated screening tool was being used for universal screening of substance use in pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions/Measurements</h3><p>Training consisted of two phases that reviewed the SBIRT process, the 5Ps screening tool, brief intervention conversations, and the process for referral to treatment. Pre- and postimplementation screening rates were compared and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests of independence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Preimplementation screening rates were 14.4%. Screening rates measured 1 month after implementation were 44.6% (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). Universal screening was not achieved.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Short-term improvement in screening for perinatal substance use was observed. Whether these results are sustainable beyond the project time frame is unknown. Future work should examine longer-term outcomes and continued barriers to universal uptake of the screening protocol.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485123002556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing for Women''s Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485123002556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的将酒精/药物使用 5Ps 筛查工具以及筛查、简单干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)流程应用到临床实践中,以确定加强培训是否会提高围产期医疗服务提供者对普遍筛查的依从性:环境/当地问题:马萨诸塞州东南部的三家社区妇产科门诊诊所。当地发现的问题是,没有使用有效的筛查工具对孕期药物使用情况进行普遍筛查:培训包括两个阶段,分别回顾了 SBIRT 流程、5Ps 筛查工具、简短干预对话和转诊治疗流程。使用描述性统计和卡方检验对实施前和实施后的筛查率进行比较和分析:结果:实施前的筛查率为 14.4%。结果:实施前的筛查率为 14.4%,实施 1 个月后的筛查率为 44.6%(p < .001)。结论:短期内提高了围产期筛查率:结论:围产期药物使用筛查得到了短期改善。结论:围产期药物使用筛查得到了短期改善,但这些结果在项目结束后能否持续还不得而知。未来的工作应研究更长期的结果,以及普遍采用筛查方案的持续障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of a Perinatal Substance Use Screening Protocol in the Outpatient Setting

Objective

To implement the 5Ps Screen for Alcohol/Substance Use tool and the screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) process into clinical practice to determine if enhanced training would improve perinatal providers’ adherence to universal screening.

Design

A quality improvement project using a pre- and postintervention design.

Setting/Local Problem

Three community-based, outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics in southeastern Massachusetts. The local problem identified was that no validated screening tool was being used for universal screening of substance use in pregnancy.

Interventions/Measurements

Training consisted of two phases that reviewed the SBIRT process, the 5Ps screening tool, brief intervention conversations, and the process for referral to treatment. Pre- and postimplementation screening rates were compared and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests of independence.

Results

Preimplementation screening rates were 14.4%. Screening rates measured 1 month after implementation were 44.6% (p < .001). Universal screening was not achieved.

Conclusion

Short-term improvement in screening for perinatal substance use was observed. Whether these results are sustainable beyond the project time frame is unknown. Future work should examine longer-term outcomes and continued barriers to universal uptake of the screening protocol.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing for Women''s Health
Nursing for Women''s Health Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing for Women"s Health publishes the most recent and compelling health care information on women"s health, newborn care and professional nursing issues. As a refereed, clinical practice journal, it provides professionals involved in providing optimum nursing care for women and their newborns with health care trends and everyday issues in a concise, practical, and easy-to-read format.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Screening Women for Intimate Partner Violence Among Health Care Providers in Thailand. A Guide to Successfully Publishing a Clinical Practice Manuscript. Evaluation of a Menstrual Hygiene Education Program for Adolescent Girls in Rural India. The Experiences of Pregnancy Among Adolescent Girls in Jordan. Implementation of Genetic Carrier Screening at Gynecologic-Related Visits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1