思考综合护理的终结--第一部分:预期创造性破坏。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000861
Deepu George
{"title":"思考综合护理的终结--第一部分:预期创造性破坏。","authors":"Deepu George","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, the author frames the development of integrated care and the Collaborative Family Healthcare Association (CFHA) through the ecocycle planning model. With four distinct stages of development and renewal-gestation, birth, maturity, and creative destruction-the ecocycle planning model encourages organizations to consider ways to ask questions to avoid a rigidity trap, which in the model appears as a process after maturity. As CFHA approaches its 30th year in 2024, the author documents a rough, imperfect history for a shared understanding of how integrated care and CFHA reached maturity and invites the readers to engage in critical questions to avoid the rigidity trap. The author contends that integrated care as a movement and CFHA as an organization have the capacity and a history of learning to ask informed questions to avoid falling prey to the rigidity trap. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":"41 4","pages":"565-569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemplating on the end of integrated care-Part I: Anticipating creative destruction.\",\"authors\":\"Deepu George\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this article, the author frames the development of integrated care and the Collaborative Family Healthcare Association (CFHA) through the ecocycle planning model. With four distinct stages of development and renewal-gestation, birth, maturity, and creative destruction-the ecocycle planning model encourages organizations to consider ways to ask questions to avoid a rigidity trap, which in the model appears as a process after maturity. As CFHA approaches its 30th year in 2024, the author documents a rough, imperfect history for a shared understanding of how integrated care and CFHA reached maturity and invites the readers to engage in critical questions to avoid the rigidity trap. The author contends that integrated care as a movement and CFHA as an organization have the capacity and a history of learning to ask informed questions to avoid falling prey to the rigidity trap. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"565-569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000861\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,作者通过生态循环规划模型来阐述综合护理和合作家庭医疗协会(CFHA)的发展。生态循环规划模型有四个不同的发展和更新阶段--酝酿、诞生、成熟和创造性破坏,它鼓励组织考虑如何提出问题,以避免陷入僵化的陷阱,在该模型中,僵化是成熟之后的一个过程。2024 年,CFHA 将迎来它的第 30 个年头,作者记录了一段粗略的、不完美的历史,让大家共同了解综合护理和 CFHA 是如何走向成熟的,并邀请读者提出关键问题,以避免陷入僵化陷阱。作者认为,综合护理作为一项运动,CFHA作为一个组织,有能力也有历史学会提出有根据的问题,以避免陷入僵化陷阱。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contemplating on the end of integrated care-Part I: Anticipating creative destruction.

In this article, the author frames the development of integrated care and the Collaborative Family Healthcare Association (CFHA) through the ecocycle planning model. With four distinct stages of development and renewal-gestation, birth, maturity, and creative destruction-the ecocycle planning model encourages organizations to consider ways to ask questions to avoid a rigidity trap, which in the model appears as a process after maturity. As CFHA approaches its 30th year in 2024, the author documents a rough, imperfect history for a shared understanding of how integrated care and CFHA reached maturity and invites the readers to engage in critical questions to avoid the rigidity trap. The author contends that integrated care as a movement and CFHA as an organization have the capacity and a history of learning to ask informed questions to avoid falling prey to the rigidity trap. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of a caregiver checklist for primary care. Adaptation of a couples intervention to promote coparenting and reduce hazardous drinking during transition to parenthood. Familism and well-being across 48 countries. Implementing a pain psychology screening process in primary care. A qualitative study on the dyadic coping experience of human papillomavirus-infected patients of childbearing age and their spouses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1