院前过敏性休克治疗过程中静脉注射肾上腺素不当导致心房颤动:病例报告。

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.15441/ceem.23.129
Haewon Jung, Hyun Wook Ryoo, Jungbae Park, Seung Hyuk Choi, Jae Hyuk Lee, Sujeong Kim
{"title":"院前过敏性休克治疗过程中静脉注射肾上腺素不当导致心房颤动:病例报告。","authors":"Haewon Jung, Hyun Wook Ryoo, Jungbae Park, Seung Hyuk Choi, Jae Hyuk Lee, Sujeong Kim","doi":"10.15441/ceem.23.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a prehospital setting, the narrow therapeutic window of epinephrine necessitates its cautious administration to avoid anaphylaxis. In this case, a 46-year-old man presented severe anaphylactic symptoms. Following the standard protocol, the emergency medical technician (EMT) administered intramuscular epinephrine; however, symptoms persisted. Under the oversight of the emergency medical services (EMS) medical director, an additional intravenous bolus of epinephrine was administered, unfortunately leading to atrial fibrillation. This case underscores the potential risks of intravenous epinephrine, which is not typically recommended for anaphylaxis without continuous monitoring. Since 2019, Korea has initiated a pilot program to expand the EMT scope of practice, which gives them the authority to administer epinephrine for anaphylaxis. The ultimate decision regarding epinephrine use for anaphylaxis, emphasizing patient safety, rests with the EMS medical director. Proper training for EMTs, coupled with the EMS medical director's comprehensive knowledge and meticulous protocol adherence, can ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"304-308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inappropriate use of intravenous epinephrine leading to atrial fibrillation during prehospital anaphylaxis treatment: a case report.\",\"authors\":\"Haewon Jung, Hyun Wook Ryoo, Jungbae Park, Seung Hyuk Choi, Jae Hyuk Lee, Sujeong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.23.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a prehospital setting, the narrow therapeutic window of epinephrine necessitates its cautious administration to avoid anaphylaxis. In this case, a 46-year-old man presented severe anaphylactic symptoms. Following the standard protocol, the emergency medical technician (EMT) administered intramuscular epinephrine; however, symptoms persisted. Under the oversight of the emergency medical services (EMS) medical director, an additional intravenous bolus of epinephrine was administered, unfortunately leading to atrial fibrillation. This case underscores the potential risks of intravenous epinephrine, which is not typically recommended for anaphylaxis without continuous monitoring. Since 2019, Korea has initiated a pilot program to expand the EMT scope of practice, which gives them the authority to administer epinephrine for anaphylaxis. The ultimate decision regarding epinephrine use for anaphylaxis, emphasizing patient safety, rests with the EMS medical director. Proper training for EMTs, coupled with the EMS medical director's comprehensive knowledge and meticulous protocol adherence, can ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"304-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在院前环境中,由于肾上腺素的治疗窗口较窄,因此在治疗过敏性休克时必须谨慎用药。在本病例中,一名 46 岁的男子出现了严重的过敏性休克症状。按照标准方案,急救医疗技术员(EMT)肌肉注射了肾上腺素,但症状依然存在。在急诊医疗服务(EMS)医疗主管的监督下,又追加了静脉注射肾上腺素,不幸导致心房颤动。这一案例凸显了静脉注射肾上腺素的潜在风险,在没有持续监测的情况下,通常不建议对过敏性休克患者使用肾上腺素。自 2019 年起,韩国启动了一项试点计划,以扩大急救医生的执业范围,使其有权为过敏性休克患者注射肾上腺素。在强调患者安全的前提下,有关使用肾上腺素治疗过敏性休克的最终决定权在急救医疗服务医疗总监手中。对急救医生进行适当的培训,再加上急救医疗服务医疗总监的全面知识和对协议的严格遵守,可以确保患者的安全和最佳治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inappropriate use of intravenous epinephrine leading to atrial fibrillation during prehospital anaphylaxis treatment: a case report.

In a prehospital setting, the narrow therapeutic window of epinephrine necessitates its cautious administration to avoid anaphylaxis. In this case, a 46-year-old man presented severe anaphylactic symptoms. Following the standard protocol, the emergency medical technician (EMT) administered intramuscular epinephrine; however, symptoms persisted. Under the oversight of the emergency medical services (EMS) medical director, an additional intravenous bolus of epinephrine was administered, unfortunately leading to atrial fibrillation. This case underscores the potential risks of intravenous epinephrine, which is not typically recommended for anaphylaxis without continuous monitoring. Since 2019, Korea has initiated a pilot program to expand the EMT scope of practice, which gives them the authority to administer epinephrine for anaphylaxis. The ultimate decision regarding epinephrine use for anaphylaxis, emphasizing patient safety, rests with the EMS medical director. Proper training for EMTs, coupled with the EMS medical director's comprehensive knowledge and meticulous protocol adherence, can ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Acute iodinate contrast medium reaction: look at the CT images! Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study. Case of multiple acute cerebral infarctions after blunt cerebrovascular injuries. Epidemiology of Deep Venous Thrombosis Among United States Emergency Departments Over an Eight-Year Period. Floating thrombus involving the aortic arch in a woman.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1