利用分形分析法比较研究健康牙周炎患者和糖尿病牙周炎患者的骨小梁结构。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Quintessence international Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b4920297
Sibel Kayaalti-Yüksek, Cansu Büyük, Merve Ağirman, Gonca Keleş
{"title":"利用分形分析法比较研究健康牙周炎患者和糖尿病牙周炎患者的骨小梁结构。","authors":"Sibel Kayaalti-Yüksek, Cansu Büyük, Merve Ağirman, Gonca Keleş","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b4920297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Fractal analysis is a numerical method that indicates the structural patterns and complexity of the trabecular bone on radiographs. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the trabecular bone structure in systemically healthy patients and diabetes mellitus patients with periodontitis using fractal analysis.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>The study included 125 mandibular first molars of nonsmoker patients. The subjects were divided into five subgroups: diabetes mellitus patients with mild-moderate periodontitis, diabetes mellitus patients with advanced periodontitis, systemically healthy individuals with mild-moderate periodontitis, systemically healthy individuals with advanced periodontitis, and systemically healthy individuals with gingivitis (control group). Clinical periodontal parameters (pocket depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment loss, and bone loss) were recorded. Two specific sites located in the mesial-distal regions (n = 250) of the mandibular first molars were identified using periapical radiographs captured with a parallel technique. Fractal analysis values were calculated using the box-counting method. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson correlation analysis were used for statistical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest fractal analysis values were observed in systemically healthy with gingivitis patients (mesial fractal analysis: 1.86 ± 0.01; distal fractal analysis: 1.85 ± 0.01). Patients with periodontitis (mesial fractal analysis: 1.78 ± 0.02; distal fractal analysis: 1.79 ± 0.01) exhibited lower fractal analysis values compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in mesial and distal fractal analysis values between all periodontitis groups. No correlation was found between age, sex, clinical attachment loss, bone loss, and fractal analysis (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although fractal analysis values were lower in the periodontitis groups compared to the control group, fractal analysis did not demonstrate any periodontitis-associated changes of bone trabeculation in diabetes at any stage of periodontitis. Furthermore, there was no significant association between fractal analysis values and age, sex, clinical attachment, and bone loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"192-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative examination of trabecular bone structure in healthy and diabetic patients with periodontitis using fractal analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sibel Kayaalti-Yüksek, Cansu Büyük, Merve Ağirman, Gonca Keleş\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b4920297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Fractal analysis is a numerical method that indicates the structural patterns and complexity of the trabecular bone on radiographs. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the trabecular bone structure in systemically healthy patients and diabetes mellitus patients with periodontitis using fractal analysis.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>The study included 125 mandibular first molars of nonsmoker patients. The subjects were divided into five subgroups: diabetes mellitus patients with mild-moderate periodontitis, diabetes mellitus patients with advanced periodontitis, systemically healthy individuals with mild-moderate periodontitis, systemically healthy individuals with advanced periodontitis, and systemically healthy individuals with gingivitis (control group). Clinical periodontal parameters (pocket depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment loss, and bone loss) were recorded. Two specific sites located in the mesial-distal regions (n = 250) of the mandibular first molars were identified using periapical radiographs captured with a parallel technique. Fractal analysis values were calculated using the box-counting method. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson correlation analysis were used for statistical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest fractal analysis values were observed in systemically healthy with gingivitis patients (mesial fractal analysis: 1.86 ± 0.01; distal fractal analysis: 1.85 ± 0.01). Patients with periodontitis (mesial fractal analysis: 1.78 ± 0.02; distal fractal analysis: 1.79 ± 0.01) exhibited lower fractal analysis values compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in mesial and distal fractal analysis values between all periodontitis groups. No correlation was found between age, sex, clinical attachment loss, bone loss, and fractal analysis (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although fractal analysis values were lower in the periodontitis groups compared to the control group, fractal analysis did not demonstrate any periodontitis-associated changes of bone trabeculation in diabetes at any stage of periodontitis. Furthermore, there was no significant association between fractal analysis values and age, sex, clinical attachment, and bone loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"192-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b4920297\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b4920297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分形分析(FA)是一种通过数字显示X光片上骨小梁结构模式和复杂性的方法。本横断面研究旨在利用分形分析评估全身健康(SH)和糖尿病(DM)牙周炎患者的骨小梁结构:研究对象包括 125 名非吸烟患者的下颌第一磨牙。受试者被分为 5 个亚组:患有轻中度牙周炎的 DM 患者、患有晚期牙周炎的 DM 患者、患有轻中度牙周炎的 SH 患者、患有晚期牙周炎的 SH 患者和患有牙龈炎的 SH 患者(对照组)。记录临床牙周参数(牙周袋深度、探诊出血、临床附着水平-CAL、骨质流失)。使用平行技术拍摄的根尖周X光片,确定了位于下颌第一磨牙中-远端区域的两个特定部位(n:250)。采用方框计数法计算 FA 值。统计评估采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和皮尔逊相关分析:与对照组相比,牙龈炎患者的 FA 值最高(中轴 FA:1.86±0.01;远端 FA:1.85±0.01),牙周炎患者的 FA 值最低(中轴 FA:1.78±0.02;远端 FA:1.79±0.01)。所有牙周炎组之间的中轴和远轴 FA 值无明显差异。年龄、性别、CAL、骨质流失与FA之间没有相关性(P>0.05):虽然与对照组相比,牙周炎组的 FA 值较低,但在牙周炎的任何阶段,FA 都没有显示出与牙周炎相关的糖尿病骨小梁变化。此外,FA 值与年龄、性别、临床附着力和骨质流失之间没有明显的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative examination of trabecular bone structure in healthy and diabetic patients with periodontitis using fractal analysis.

Objectives: Fractal analysis is a numerical method that indicates the structural patterns and complexity of the trabecular bone on radiographs. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the trabecular bone structure in systemically healthy patients and diabetes mellitus patients with periodontitis using fractal analysis.

Method and materials: The study included 125 mandibular first molars of nonsmoker patients. The subjects were divided into five subgroups: diabetes mellitus patients with mild-moderate periodontitis, diabetes mellitus patients with advanced periodontitis, systemically healthy individuals with mild-moderate periodontitis, systemically healthy individuals with advanced periodontitis, and systemically healthy individuals with gingivitis (control group). Clinical periodontal parameters (pocket depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment loss, and bone loss) were recorded. Two specific sites located in the mesial-distal regions (n = 250) of the mandibular first molars were identified using periapical radiographs captured with a parallel technique. Fractal analysis values were calculated using the box-counting method. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson correlation analysis were used for statistical evaluation.

Results: The highest fractal analysis values were observed in systemically healthy with gingivitis patients (mesial fractal analysis: 1.86 ± 0.01; distal fractal analysis: 1.85 ± 0.01). Patients with periodontitis (mesial fractal analysis: 1.78 ± 0.02; distal fractal analysis: 1.79 ± 0.01) exhibited lower fractal analysis values compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in mesial and distal fractal analysis values between all periodontitis groups. No correlation was found between age, sex, clinical attachment loss, bone loss, and fractal analysis (P > .05).

Conclusions: Although fractal analysis values were lower in the periodontitis groups compared to the control group, fractal analysis did not demonstrate any periodontitis-associated changes of bone trabeculation in diabetes at any stage of periodontitis. Furthermore, there was no significant association between fractal analysis values and age, sex, clinical attachment, and bone loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Fully digital workflow involving 3D printed gingivectomy guide and 3D printed waxup to restore and reshape a congenitally missing central incisor after orthodontic treatment. Use of artificial intelligence to detect dental caries on intraoral photos. Complications and risk factors associated with zygomatic implants: retrospective analysis with 73 consecutive patients followed for 3.5 years. Computer-assisted contouring combined with bone ostectomy for dental implant placement of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia involving the right maxilla. Musculoskeletal pain is associated with poor sleep quality and increased daytime sleepiness in dental students: a cross-sectional pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1