无人驾驶飞行器(UAV)使用室内喷洒装置低量浓缩施用杀虫剂的功效评估

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Applied Entomology and Zoology Pub Date : 2024-01-28 DOI:10.1007/s13355-023-00858-1
Hiroyuki Murata, Shinichi Masui, Yuta Tsuchida
{"title":"无人驾驶飞行器(UAV)使用室内喷洒装置低量浓缩施用杀虫剂的功效评估","authors":"Hiroyuki Murata,&nbsp;Shinichi Masui,&nbsp;Yuta Tsuchida","doi":"10.1007/s13355-023-00858-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To optimize operating conditions and the selection of pesticides suitable for spraying from UAVs, we evaluated the coverage of sprayed droplets in the range of 0.001–100% coverage by constructing an indoor spraying device. With the device, the coverage rate decreased with the horizontal distance from the nozzle, and the complementary log–log transformed value of the coverage was approximated by a quadratic function of the distance. The natural logarithm of the deposited pesticide amount could be linearly expressed by the complementary log–log transformed value of the coverage. Different probit regression equations were obtained between the coverage rate of sprayed droplets and egg mortality of <i>Panonychus citri</i> due to four acaricides: spiromesifen, etoxazole, milbemectin, and acynonapyr. From the probit regressions, conventional spraying achieved 90% egg mortality with 150 mg/L spiromesifen (19–23% coverage rate), 50 mg/L etoxazole (14%), 10 mg/L milbemectin (98%), and 67 mg/L acynonapyr (92%). Ultra-low-volume concentrate spraying for UAVs achieved the same with 15,000 mg/L spiromesifen (0.017%), 5000 mg/L etoxazole (1.116%), 1000 mg/L milbemectin (1.339%), and 6667 mg/L acynonapyr (8.868%).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8551,"journal":{"name":"Applied Entomology and Zoology","volume":"59 2","pages":"103 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy evaluation of low-volume concentrate application of pesticides by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) using an indoor spraying device\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Murata,&nbsp;Shinichi Masui,&nbsp;Yuta Tsuchida\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13355-023-00858-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To optimize operating conditions and the selection of pesticides suitable for spraying from UAVs, we evaluated the coverage of sprayed droplets in the range of 0.001–100% coverage by constructing an indoor spraying device. With the device, the coverage rate decreased with the horizontal distance from the nozzle, and the complementary log–log transformed value of the coverage was approximated by a quadratic function of the distance. The natural logarithm of the deposited pesticide amount could be linearly expressed by the complementary log–log transformed value of the coverage. Different probit regression equations were obtained between the coverage rate of sprayed droplets and egg mortality of <i>Panonychus citri</i> due to four acaricides: spiromesifen, etoxazole, milbemectin, and acynonapyr. From the probit regressions, conventional spraying achieved 90% egg mortality with 150 mg/L spiromesifen (19–23% coverage rate), 50 mg/L etoxazole (14%), 10 mg/L milbemectin (98%), and 67 mg/L acynonapyr (92%). Ultra-low-volume concentrate spraying for UAVs achieved the same with 15,000 mg/L spiromesifen (0.017%), 5000 mg/L etoxazole (1.116%), 1000 mg/L milbemectin (1.339%), and 6667 mg/L acynonapyr (8.868%).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Entomology and Zoology\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"103 - 110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Entomology and Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13355-023-00858-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Entomology and Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13355-023-00858-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 为了优化操作条件和选择适合无人机喷洒的杀虫剂,我们通过构建室内喷洒装置,评估了喷洒液滴在 0.001-100% 覆盖率范围内的覆盖率。使用该装置后,覆盖率随喷嘴水平距离的增加而降低,覆盖率的对数-对数互补变换值近似为距离的二次函数。沉积农药量的自然对数可以用覆盖率的对数-对数互补变换值来线性表示。在螺旋霉素、乙螨唑、米贝菌素和腈菌唑四种杀螨剂的喷洒液滴覆盖率与柑橘蟠蚧虫卵死亡率之间得到了不同的 probit 回归方程。从 probit 回归结果来看,传统喷洒方法的虫卵死亡率为 90%,其中螺旋霉素为 150 毫克/升(覆盖率为 19%-23%),乙螨唑为 50 毫克/升(覆盖率为 14%),米贝菌素为 10 毫克/升(覆盖率为 98%),炔草酯为 67 毫克/升(覆盖率为 92%)。无人驾驶飞行器的超低容量浓缩喷洒也达到了同样的效果:15,000 毫克/升螺旋霉素(0.017%)、5000 毫克/升乙螨唑(1.116%)、1000 毫克/升密克菌素(1.339%)和 6667 毫克/升炔草酯(8.868%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy evaluation of low-volume concentrate application of pesticides by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) using an indoor spraying device

To optimize operating conditions and the selection of pesticides suitable for spraying from UAVs, we evaluated the coverage of sprayed droplets in the range of 0.001–100% coverage by constructing an indoor spraying device. With the device, the coverage rate decreased with the horizontal distance from the nozzle, and the complementary log–log transformed value of the coverage was approximated by a quadratic function of the distance. The natural logarithm of the deposited pesticide amount could be linearly expressed by the complementary log–log transformed value of the coverage. Different probit regression equations were obtained between the coverage rate of sprayed droplets and egg mortality of Panonychus citri due to four acaricides: spiromesifen, etoxazole, milbemectin, and acynonapyr. From the probit regressions, conventional spraying achieved 90% egg mortality with 150 mg/L spiromesifen (19–23% coverage rate), 50 mg/L etoxazole (14%), 10 mg/L milbemectin (98%), and 67 mg/L acynonapyr (92%). Ultra-low-volume concentrate spraying for UAVs achieved the same with 15,000 mg/L spiromesifen (0.017%), 5000 mg/L etoxazole (1.116%), 1000 mg/L milbemectin (1.339%), and 6667 mg/L acynonapyr (8.868%).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Entomology and Zoology publishes articles concerned with applied entomology, applied zoology, agricultural chemicals and pest control in English. Contributions of a basic and fundamental nature may be accepted at the discretion of the Editor. Manuscripts of original research papers, technical notes and reviews are accepted for consideration. No manuscript that has been published elsewhere will be accepted for publication.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of a gummies-like diet in retaining flight-controlled adults of the Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), under laboratory and field conditions Spatial distribution and host utilization patterns of Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae), Euscepes postfasciatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), and Omphisa anastomosalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on the wild host Ipomoea indica (Solanales: Convolvulaceae) in Okinawa, Japan Revealing the hidden resource of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Asteraceae weeds as alternative hosts Control of the Japanese orange fly, Bactrocera tsuneonis (Diptera: Tephritidae), through several preharvest management practices: establishment of a phytosanitary measure for citrus fruits for export Effects of Alphacypermethrin selection on fitness traits of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1