垄断、工作任务和劳动力市场集中度

Samuel Dodini, Michael Lovenheim, Kjell Salvanes, Alexander Willén
{"title":"垄断、工作任务和劳动力市场集中度","authors":"Samuel Dodini, Michael Lovenheim, Kjell Salvanes, Alexander Willén","doi":"10.1093/ej/ueae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper extends the monopsony literature by taking a task-based approach and estimating the causal effect of concentration on labour market outcomes. Using detailed employer-employee data from Norway, we find that our job task-based measure shows lower degrees of concentration than conventional industry-and occupation-based measures. Exploiting mass layoffs as exogenous shocks to local labour demand, we show that workers who experience mass separations in more concentrated markets have substantially worse subsequent labour market outcomes than workers in less-concentrated markets. Our results point to the existence of employer market power that is driven by the concentration of skill demand across firms.","PeriodicalId":501319,"journal":{"name":"The Economic Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monopsony, Job Tasks, and Labour Market Concentration\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Dodini, Michael Lovenheim, Kjell Salvanes, Alexander Willén\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ej/ueae002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper extends the monopsony literature by taking a task-based approach and estimating the causal effect of concentration on labour market outcomes. Using detailed employer-employee data from Norway, we find that our job task-based measure shows lower degrees of concentration than conventional industry-and occupation-based measures. Exploiting mass layoffs as exogenous shocks to local labour demand, we show that workers who experience mass separations in more concentrated markets have substantially worse subsequent labour market outcomes than workers in less-concentrated markets. Our results point to the existence of employer market power that is driven by the concentration of skill demand across firms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Economic Journal\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用基于任务的方法,对集中度对劳动力市场结果的因果效应进行了估算,从而扩展了有关垄断的文献。利用挪威详细的雇主-雇员数据,我们发现,与传统的基于行业和职业的衡量方法相比,我们基于工作任务的衡量方法显示出较低的集中度。我们将大规模裁员作为当地劳动力需求的外生冲击加以利用,结果表明,在集中度较高的市场中经历大规模离职的工人,其随后的劳动力市场结果要比在集中度较低的市场中的工人差得多。我们的研究结果表明,在企业技能需求集中的驱动下,雇主的市场力量是存在的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monopsony, Job Tasks, and Labour Market Concentration
This paper extends the monopsony literature by taking a task-based approach and estimating the causal effect of concentration on labour market outcomes. Using detailed employer-employee data from Norway, we find that our job task-based measure shows lower degrees of concentration than conventional industry-and occupation-based measures. Exploiting mass layoffs as exogenous shocks to local labour demand, we show that workers who experience mass separations in more concentrated markets have substantially worse subsequent labour market outcomes than workers in less-concentrated markets. Our results point to the existence of employer market power that is driven by the concentration of skill demand across firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal Taxation of Capital Income with Heterogeneous Rates of Return Lobbying for Globalisation Healthcare Appointments as Commitment Devices House prices and misallocation: the impact of the collateral channel on productivity Trading stocks builds financial confidence and compresses the gender gap
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1