社会(公正)数学:排序教学法及其继承的真理制度的种族化影响

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Studies in Mathematics Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s10649-023-10289-y
Ayşe Yolcu, Kathryn L. Kirchgasler
{"title":"社会(公正)数学:排序教学法及其继承的真理制度的种族化影响","authors":"Ayşe Yolcu, Kathryn L. Kirchgasler","doi":"10.1007/s10649-023-10289-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines how making mathematics responsive to perceived differences in students’ real-life needs historically produced racializing distinctions in school mathematics. Decentering social actors and their intentions, we analyze pedagogical techniques in social mathematics courses (1930s–1940s) and social justice mathematics education studies oriented to health and civic participation (1990s–). Despite shifts in ethico-political principles—from enlightening to empowering—racializing effects of these pedagogies persist by projecting relative distances between populations and cultural norms of proper living and well-ordered public life. Juxtaposing past and present, we highlight dangers in how pedagogical interventions to improve malleable differences in children and communities also racialize target groups as yet-to-develop the evidence-based reasoning or mathematical consciousness deemed necessary to attain what are imputed as healthy private and public life. We offer ordering pedagogies as an analytical tool to interrogate practices of racialization and to account for inherited regimes of truth operating in mathematics education by scrutinizing how pedagogical practices produce difference—dividing and ordering students along a hierarchy of perceived needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48107,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social (justice) mathematics: racializing effects of ordering pedagogies and their inherited regimes of truth\",\"authors\":\"Ayşe Yolcu, Kathryn L. Kirchgasler\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10649-023-10289-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article examines how making mathematics responsive to perceived differences in students’ real-life needs historically produced racializing distinctions in school mathematics. Decentering social actors and their intentions, we analyze pedagogical techniques in social mathematics courses (1930s–1940s) and social justice mathematics education studies oriented to health and civic participation (1990s–). Despite shifts in ethico-political principles—from enlightening to empowering—racializing effects of these pedagogies persist by projecting relative distances between populations and cultural norms of proper living and well-ordered public life. Juxtaposing past and present, we highlight dangers in how pedagogical interventions to improve malleable differences in children and communities also racialize target groups as yet-to-develop the evidence-based reasoning or mathematical consciousness deemed necessary to attain what are imputed as healthy private and public life. We offer ordering pedagogies as an analytical tool to interrogate practices of racialization and to account for inherited regimes of truth operating in mathematics education by scrutinizing how pedagogical practices produce difference—dividing and ordering students along a hierarchy of perceived needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Studies in Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Studies in Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10289-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10289-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了历史上如何使数学满足学生在现实生活中的需求差异,从而在学校数学中产生种族化差异。从社会行动者及其意图的角度出发,我们分析了社会数学课程(1930-1940 年代)和以健康和公民参与为导向的社会公正数学教育研究(1990 年代-)中的教学技巧。尽管伦理-政治原则发生了转变--从启蒙到赋权,但这些教学法的种族化效应依然存在,它们投射出民众与适当生活和有序公共生活的文化规范之间的相对距离。我们将过去和现在并列,强调了为改善儿童和社区可塑性差异而采取的教学干预措施如何将目标群体种族化的危险,因为他们尚未发展出被认为是实现健康的私人和公共生活所必需的基于证据的推理或数学意识。我们将排序教学法作为一种分析工具,通过仔细研究教学实践如何产生差异--按照认知需求的等级对学生进行划分和排序--来审视种族化的实践,并解释数学教育中固有的真理制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social (justice) mathematics: racializing effects of ordering pedagogies and their inherited regimes of truth

This article examines how making mathematics responsive to perceived differences in students’ real-life needs historically produced racializing distinctions in school mathematics. Decentering social actors and their intentions, we analyze pedagogical techniques in social mathematics courses (1930s–1940s) and social justice mathematics education studies oriented to health and civic participation (1990s–). Despite shifts in ethico-political principles—from enlightening to empowering—racializing effects of these pedagogies persist by projecting relative distances between populations and cultural norms of proper living and well-ordered public life. Juxtaposing past and present, we highlight dangers in how pedagogical interventions to improve malleable differences in children and communities also racialize target groups as yet-to-develop the evidence-based reasoning or mathematical consciousness deemed necessary to attain what are imputed as healthy private and public life. We offer ordering pedagogies as an analytical tool to interrogate practices of racialization and to account for inherited regimes of truth operating in mathematics education by scrutinizing how pedagogical practices produce difference—dividing and ordering students along a hierarchy of perceived needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Educational Studies in Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Educational Studies in Mathematics presents new ideas and developments of major importance to those working in the field of mathematics education. It seeks to reflect both the variety of research concerns within this field and the range of methods used to study them. It deals with methodological, pedagogical/didactical, political and socio-cultural aspects of teaching and learning of mathematics, rather than with specific programmes for teaching mathematics. Within this range, Educational Studies in Mathematics is open to all research approaches. The emphasis is on high-level articles which are of more than local or national interest.? All contributions to this journal are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Mathematical discussion in classrooms as a technologically-supported activity fostering participation and inclusion Becoming exceptional: the role of capital in the development and mediation of mathematics identity and degree trajectories The emergence of the analytic-structural way of thinking in linear algebra as a blended space Investigating students’ reasoning in generalization of deconstructive figural patterns “I’ll just try to mimic that”: an exploration of students’ analogical structure creation in abstract algebra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1