放牧广阔半干旱牧场的蓄养牛的肠道甲烷排放量快照

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Rangeland Ecology & Management Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.rama.2024.01.001
Edward J. Raynor , Ashley Schilling-Hazlett , Sara E. Place , Juan Vargas Martinez , Logan R. Thompson , Melissa K. Johnston , Tamarah R. Jorns , Matthew R. Beck , Larry A. Kuehn , Justin D. Derner , Kimberly R. Stackhouse-Lawson
{"title":"放牧广阔半干旱牧场的蓄养牛的肠道甲烷排放量快照","authors":"Edward J. Raynor ,&nbsp;Ashley Schilling-Hazlett ,&nbsp;Sara E. Place ,&nbsp;Juan Vargas Martinez ,&nbsp;Logan R. Thompson ,&nbsp;Melissa K. Johnston ,&nbsp;Tamarah R. Jorns ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Beck ,&nbsp;Larry A. Kuehn ,&nbsp;Justin D. Derner ,&nbsp;Kimberly R. Stackhouse-Lawson","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from cattle grazing extensive semiarid rangelands are largely unknown and represent a considerable knowledge gap for the beef cattle industry. Knowledge of baseline enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions is beneficial for understanding the range of variability in individual animal emission production (g CH<sub>4</sub> head [hd]<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>) and emission intensity (g CH<sub>4</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup> average daily gain [ADG]<sup>−1</sup>). Here, we used field-based technology to determine enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from yearling steers grazing the North American shortgrass steppe in northeastern Colorado in midsummer 2022. Twenty-six animals were acclimated for 30 d (1−30 June) to the sampling equipment in the field before the measurement of emissions (1−31 July). Twelve (46%) yearling steers fully acclimated, with mean CH<sub>4</sub> emissions ranging from 113.3 to 261.7 g hd<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> across the sampling period. Daily CH<sub>4</sub> production values were 20% higher for steers (<em>n</em> = 9) from a local ranch compared with steers (<em>n</em> = 3) that originated from a mixed-grass prairie in south-central Nebraska (202.63 vs. 169.03 g CH<sub>4</sub> hd<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>). ADG of local steers was three times greater than their counterparts (0.54 vs. 0.18 kg hd<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>), resulting in lower emission intensity (g CH<sub>4</sub>/ADG; emission intensity) from local steers compared with the naïve steers (237.6 vs. 418.5 emission intensity). In addition, we compared measured CH<sub>4</sub> emissions with predicted emissions calculated using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change tier 2 methodology; measured emissions were 31% greater than predicted for the local steers and 18% greater than steers from nonlocal steers. Results indicate that further research addressing grazing animal enteric CH4 emissions in extensive rangelands is needed. Further, efforts should be context specific for comparative efforts across rangeland ecosystems and animal origin to inform more accurate assessments of sustainability of grazing beef cattle related to greenhouse gas mitigation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000010/pdfft?md5=81bd9bd57003b8c044b58197b731e8dc&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742424000010-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Snapshot of Enteric Methane Emissions from Stocker Cattle Grazing Extensive Semiarid Rangelands\",\"authors\":\"Edward J. Raynor ,&nbsp;Ashley Schilling-Hazlett ,&nbsp;Sara E. Place ,&nbsp;Juan Vargas Martinez ,&nbsp;Logan R. Thompson ,&nbsp;Melissa K. Johnston ,&nbsp;Tamarah R. Jorns ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Beck ,&nbsp;Larry A. Kuehn ,&nbsp;Justin D. Derner ,&nbsp;Kimberly R. Stackhouse-Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rama.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from cattle grazing extensive semiarid rangelands are largely unknown and represent a considerable knowledge gap for the beef cattle industry. Knowledge of baseline enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions is beneficial for understanding the range of variability in individual animal emission production (g CH<sub>4</sub> head [hd]<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>) and emission intensity (g CH<sub>4</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup> average daily gain [ADG]<sup>−1</sup>). Here, we used field-based technology to determine enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from yearling steers grazing the North American shortgrass steppe in northeastern Colorado in midsummer 2022. Twenty-six animals were acclimated for 30 d (1−30 June) to the sampling equipment in the field before the measurement of emissions (1−31 July). Twelve (46%) yearling steers fully acclimated, with mean CH<sub>4</sub> emissions ranging from 113.3 to 261.7 g hd<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> across the sampling period. Daily CH<sub>4</sub> production values were 20% higher for steers (<em>n</em> = 9) from a local ranch compared with steers (<em>n</em> = 3) that originated from a mixed-grass prairie in south-central Nebraska (202.63 vs. 169.03 g CH<sub>4</sub> hd<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>). ADG of local steers was three times greater than their counterparts (0.54 vs. 0.18 kg hd<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>), resulting in lower emission intensity (g CH<sub>4</sub>/ADG; emission intensity) from local steers compared with the naïve steers (237.6 vs. 418.5 emission intensity). In addition, we compared measured CH<sub>4</sub> emissions with predicted emissions calculated using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change tier 2 methodology; measured emissions were 31% greater than predicted for the local steers and 18% greater than steers from nonlocal steers. Results indicate that further research addressing grazing animal enteric CH4 emissions in extensive rangelands is needed. Further, efforts should be context specific for comparative efforts across rangeland ecosystems and animal origin to inform more accurate assessments of sustainability of grazing beef cattle related to greenhouse gas mitigation strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangeland Ecology & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000010/pdfft?md5=81bd9bd57003b8c044b58197b731e8dc&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742424000010-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangeland Ecology & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大面积半干旱牧场上放牧的牛的肠道甲烷(CH4)排放量在很大程度上不为人所知,这也是肉牛业的一大知识空白。了解肠道甲烷(CH4)的基线排放量有利于了解动物个体排放量(克 CH4 头 [hd]-1 d-1)和排放强度(克 CH4 千克-1 平均日增重 [ADG]-1)的变化范围。在此,我们采用基于现场的技术,测定了 2022 年仲夏在科罗拉多州东北部北美矮草草原放牧的一岁犊牛的肠道甲烷排放量。在测量排放量之前(7 月 1-31 日),26 头牛在野外适应采样设备 30 天(6 月 1-30 日)。12头(46%)一岁牛完全适应后,在整个采样期间的平均 CH4 排放量为 113.3 至 261.7 g hd-1 d-1。与来自内布拉斯加州中南部杂草草原的母牛(n = 3)相比,来自当地牧场的母牛(n = 9)的日甲烷产生量高出 20%(202.63 vs. 169.03 g CH4 hd-1 d-1)。当地母牛的平均日增重(ADG)是同类母牛的三倍(0.54 vs. 0.18 kg hd-1 d-1),因此当地母牛的排放强度(g CH4/ADG; 排放强度)低于纯种母牛(237.6 vs. 418.5 排放强度)。此外,我们还将测得的甲烷排放量与采用政府间气候变化专门委员会第 2 级方法计算的预测排放量进行了比较;测得的排放量中,本地母牛的排放量比预测值高出 31%,比非本地母牛的排放量高出 18%。结果表明,需要进一步研究广阔牧场中放牧动物肠道的甲烷排放量。此外,应根据具体情况对不同牧场生态系统和动物来源进行比较,以便更准确地评估与温室气体减排战略相关的放牧肉牛的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Snapshot of Enteric Methane Emissions from Stocker Cattle Grazing Extensive Semiarid Rangelands

Enteric methane (CH4) emissions from cattle grazing extensive semiarid rangelands are largely unknown and represent a considerable knowledge gap for the beef cattle industry. Knowledge of baseline enteric CH4 emissions is beneficial for understanding the range of variability in individual animal emission production (g CH4 head [hd]−1 d−1) and emission intensity (g CH4 kg−1 average daily gain [ADG]−1). Here, we used field-based technology to determine enteric CH4 emissions from yearling steers grazing the North American shortgrass steppe in northeastern Colorado in midsummer 2022. Twenty-six animals were acclimated for 30 d (1−30 June) to the sampling equipment in the field before the measurement of emissions (1−31 July). Twelve (46%) yearling steers fully acclimated, with mean CH4 emissions ranging from 113.3 to 261.7 g hd−1 d−1 across the sampling period. Daily CH4 production values were 20% higher for steers (n = 9) from a local ranch compared with steers (n = 3) that originated from a mixed-grass prairie in south-central Nebraska (202.63 vs. 169.03 g CH4 hd−1 d−1). ADG of local steers was three times greater than their counterparts (0.54 vs. 0.18 kg hd−1 d−1), resulting in lower emission intensity (g CH4/ADG; emission intensity) from local steers compared with the naïve steers (237.6 vs. 418.5 emission intensity). In addition, we compared measured CH4 emissions with predicted emissions calculated using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change tier 2 methodology; measured emissions were 31% greater than predicted for the local steers and 18% greater than steers from nonlocal steers. Results indicate that further research addressing grazing animal enteric CH4 emissions in extensive rangelands is needed. Further, efforts should be context specific for comparative efforts across rangeland ecosystems and animal origin to inform more accurate assessments of sustainability of grazing beef cattle related to greenhouse gas mitigation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Evaluating the Sagebrush Conservation Design Strategy Through the Performance of a Sagebrush Indicator Species Defend and Grow the Core for Birds: How a Sagebrush Conservation Strategy Benefits Rangeland Birds The Carbon Security Index: A Novel Approach to Assessing How Secure Carbon Is in Sagebrush Ecosystems Within the Great Basin Crossing the Chasm: Using Technical Transfer to Bridge Science Production and Management Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1