{"title":"低强度激光疗法和低强度脉冲超声波对实验性周围神经损伤 Wistar 大鼠运动恢复的影响","authors":"Illavenil J, Prathap Suganthirababu, Lavanya Prathap, Mydhili Govindarasu, Kumaresan. A, Vignesh Srinivasan, Jagatheesan alagesan","doi":"10.37506/a6jhfj72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Damage or disease can result in peripheral nerve injury, which is a frequent clinical issue. It frequentlyrenders a person disabled by causing severe sensory loss and motor deficiencies along with pain, tingling, burningand other nagging sensations. A form of ultrasound called Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, which uses far lessenergy than normal ultrasound (3 W/cm2). A biological reaction is triggered by low-level laser light having awavelength of 808nm and a power range of 1-1000 mW.Purpose: The Study is to find out the effect of low-level laser therapy and low intensity pulsed ultrasound onmotor recovery among experimentally induced peripheral nerve injury in Wistar rats.Methods: Eighteen rats were chosen in total, skin hair was removed to expose the sciatic nerve area, and the crushinjury was done by hemostatic forceps for 30 seconds, the group 1 is ultrasound, group 2 is laser and group 3 iscontrol group. The Step Length Ratio (SLR) was used as an outcome measure to assess motor recovery.Result: All three groups are statistically significant (p<0.001) was analysed using one-way ANOVA duringintervention period (7th, 24th, 21st day) but LLLT & UST has shown better improvement in their functional indexthan the control group.Conclusion: According to the results, LLLT has more impact in motor recovery than LIPU also each treatment hassubstantial impact on accelerating nerve regeneration and shortening the recovery time.","PeriodicalId":516273,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of low-level Laser Therapy and Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Motor Recovery among Experimentally Induced Peripheral Nerve Injury in Wistar Rats\",\"authors\":\"Illavenil J, Prathap Suganthirababu, Lavanya Prathap, Mydhili Govindarasu, Kumaresan. A, Vignesh Srinivasan, Jagatheesan alagesan\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/a6jhfj72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Damage or disease can result in peripheral nerve injury, which is a frequent clinical issue. It frequentlyrenders a person disabled by causing severe sensory loss and motor deficiencies along with pain, tingling, burningand other nagging sensations. A form of ultrasound called Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, which uses far lessenergy than normal ultrasound (3 W/cm2). A biological reaction is triggered by low-level laser light having awavelength of 808nm and a power range of 1-1000 mW.Purpose: The Study is to find out the effect of low-level laser therapy and low intensity pulsed ultrasound onmotor recovery among experimentally induced peripheral nerve injury in Wistar rats.Methods: Eighteen rats were chosen in total, skin hair was removed to expose the sciatic nerve area, and the crushinjury was done by hemostatic forceps for 30 seconds, the group 1 is ultrasound, group 2 is laser and group 3 iscontrol group. The Step Length Ratio (SLR) was used as an outcome measure to assess motor recovery.Result: All three groups are statistically significant (p<0.001) was analysed using one-way ANOVA duringintervention period (7th, 24th, 21st day) but LLLT & UST has shown better improvement in their functional indexthan the control group.Conclusion: According to the results, LLLT has more impact in motor recovery than LIPU also each treatment hassubstantial impact on accelerating nerve regeneration and shortening the recovery time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/a6jhfj72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/a6jhfj72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of low-level Laser Therapy and Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Motor Recovery among Experimentally Induced Peripheral Nerve Injury in Wistar Rats
Background: Damage or disease can result in peripheral nerve injury, which is a frequent clinical issue. It frequentlyrenders a person disabled by causing severe sensory loss and motor deficiencies along with pain, tingling, burningand other nagging sensations. A form of ultrasound called Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, which uses far lessenergy than normal ultrasound (3 W/cm2). A biological reaction is triggered by low-level laser light having awavelength of 808nm and a power range of 1-1000 mW.Purpose: The Study is to find out the effect of low-level laser therapy and low intensity pulsed ultrasound onmotor recovery among experimentally induced peripheral nerve injury in Wistar rats.Methods: Eighteen rats were chosen in total, skin hair was removed to expose the sciatic nerve area, and the crushinjury was done by hemostatic forceps for 30 seconds, the group 1 is ultrasound, group 2 is laser and group 3 iscontrol group. The Step Length Ratio (SLR) was used as an outcome measure to assess motor recovery.Result: All three groups are statistically significant (p<0.001) was analysed using one-way ANOVA duringintervention period (7th, 24th, 21st day) but LLLT & UST has shown better improvement in their functional indexthan the control group.Conclusion: According to the results, LLLT has more impact in motor recovery than LIPU also each treatment hassubstantial impact on accelerating nerve regeneration and shortening the recovery time.