对年龄≥ 66 岁的成年人进行的基于人口的骨折后存活率研究:呼吁在出院时采取行动

IF 3.4 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM JBMR Plus Pub Date : 2024-01-20 DOI:10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae002
Geneviève Vincent, J. Adachi, Emil Schemitsch, J. Tarride, Nathan Ho, Rajvi J Wani, Jacques P. Brown
{"title":"对年龄≥ 66 岁的成年人进行的基于人口的骨折后存活率研究:呼吁在出院时采取行动","authors":"Geneviève Vincent, J. Adachi, Emil Schemitsch, J. Tarride, Nathan Ho, Rajvi J Wani, Jacques P. Brown","doi":"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Post-fracture survival rates provide prognostic information but are rarely reported along with other mortality outcomes in adults aged ≥50 years. The timing of survival change following a fracture also needs to be further elucidated. This population-based, matched-cohort, retrospective database study examined 98 474 patients (73% women) aged ≥66 years with an index fracture occurring at an osteoporotic site (hip, clinical vertebral, proximal non-hip non-vertebral [pNHNV], and distal non-hip non-vertebral [dNHNV]) from 2011 to 2015, who were matched (1:1) to non-fracture individuals based on sex, age, and comorbidities. All-cause 1- and 5-year overall survival and relative survival ratios (RSRs) were assessed and time trends in survival changes were characterized starting immediately after a fracture. In both sexes, overall survival was markedly decreased over 6 years of follow-up after hip, vertebral, and pNHNV fractures, and as expected, worse survival rates were observed in older patients and males. The lowest 5-year RSRs were observed after hip fractures in males (66–85 years, 51.9%–63.9%; ≥86 years, 34.5%), followed by vertebral fractures in males (66–85 years, 53.2%–69.4%; ≥86 years, 35.5%), and hip fractures in females (66–85 years, 69.8%–79.0%; ≥86 years, 52.8%). Although RSRs did not decrease as markedly after dNHNV fractures in younger patients, relatively low 5-year RSRs were observed in females (75.9%) and males (69.5%) aged ≥86 years. The greatest reduction in survival occurred within the initial month after hip, vertebral, and pNHNV fractures, indicating a high relative impact of short-term factors, with survival-reduction effects persisting over time. Therefore, the most critical period for implementing interventions aimed at improving post-fracture prognosis appears to be immediately after a fracture; however, considering the immediate need for introducing such interventions, primary fracture prevention is also crucial to prevent the occurrence of the initial fracture in high-risk patients.","PeriodicalId":14611,"journal":{"name":"JBMR Plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-fracture survival in a population-based study of adults aged ≥ 66 years: a call to action at hospital discharge\",\"authors\":\"Geneviève Vincent, J. Adachi, Emil Schemitsch, J. Tarride, Nathan Ho, Rajvi J Wani, Jacques P. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Post-fracture survival rates provide prognostic information but are rarely reported along with other mortality outcomes in adults aged ≥50 years. The timing of survival change following a fracture also needs to be further elucidated. This population-based, matched-cohort, retrospective database study examined 98 474 patients (73% women) aged ≥66 years with an index fracture occurring at an osteoporotic site (hip, clinical vertebral, proximal non-hip non-vertebral [pNHNV], and distal non-hip non-vertebral [dNHNV]) from 2011 to 2015, who were matched (1:1) to non-fracture individuals based on sex, age, and comorbidities. All-cause 1- and 5-year overall survival and relative survival ratios (RSRs) were assessed and time trends in survival changes were characterized starting immediately after a fracture. In both sexes, overall survival was markedly decreased over 6 years of follow-up after hip, vertebral, and pNHNV fractures, and as expected, worse survival rates were observed in older patients and males. The lowest 5-year RSRs were observed after hip fractures in males (66–85 years, 51.9%–63.9%; ≥86 years, 34.5%), followed by vertebral fractures in males (66–85 years, 53.2%–69.4%; ≥86 years, 35.5%), and hip fractures in females (66–85 years, 69.8%–79.0%; ≥86 years, 52.8%). Although RSRs did not decrease as markedly after dNHNV fractures in younger patients, relatively low 5-year RSRs were observed in females (75.9%) and males (69.5%) aged ≥86 years. The greatest reduction in survival occurred within the initial month after hip, vertebral, and pNHNV fractures, indicating a high relative impact of short-term factors, with survival-reduction effects persisting over time. Therefore, the most critical period for implementing interventions aimed at improving post-fracture prognosis appears to be immediately after a fracture; however, considering the immediate need for introducing such interventions, primary fracture prevention is also crucial to prevent the occurrence of the initial fracture in high-risk patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBMR Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨折后存活率提供了预后信息,但很少与其他死亡率结果一起报告年龄≥50 岁的成年人的骨折后存活率。骨折后存活率变化的时间也需要进一步阐明。这项基于人群、配对队列的回顾性数据库研究调查了 2011 年至 2015 年期间 98 474 名年龄≥66 岁的患者(73% 为女性),他们的骨折发生在骨质疏松部位(髋部、临床椎体、近端非髋部非椎体 [pNHNV] 和远端非髋部非椎体 [dNHNV]),并根据性别、年龄和合并症与非骨折患者进行了配对(1:1)。评估了全因1年和5年总生存率和相对生存率(RSR),并描述了骨折后立即开始的生存率变化的时间趋势。在髋部骨折、椎体骨折和 pNHNV 骨折后的 6 年随访期间,男女患者的总存活率都明显下降,正如预期的那样,老年患者和男性患者的存活率更低。男性髋部骨折后的 5 年 RSR 最低(66-85 岁,51.9%-63.9%;≥86 岁,34.5%),其次是男性椎体骨折(66-85 岁,53.2%-69.4%;≥86 岁,35.5%)和女性髋部骨折(66-85 岁,69.8%-79.0%;≥86 岁,52.8%)。虽然年轻患者发生 dNHNV 骨折后 RSRs 的下降并不明显,但在年龄≥86 岁的女性(75.9%)和男性(69.5%)中观察到的 5 年 RSRs 相对较低。髋部、椎体和 pNHNV 骨折发生后的最初一个月内,存活率降低幅度最大,这表明短期因素的相对影响较大,存活率降低的影响会随着时间的推移而持续。因此,实施旨在改善骨折后预后的干预措施的最关键时期似乎是骨折后的第一时间;然而,考虑到引入此类干预措施的迫切需要,骨折的初级预防对于防止高危患者发生初次骨折也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-fracture survival in a population-based study of adults aged ≥ 66 years: a call to action at hospital discharge
Post-fracture survival rates provide prognostic information but are rarely reported along with other mortality outcomes in adults aged ≥50 years. The timing of survival change following a fracture also needs to be further elucidated. This population-based, matched-cohort, retrospective database study examined 98 474 patients (73% women) aged ≥66 years with an index fracture occurring at an osteoporotic site (hip, clinical vertebral, proximal non-hip non-vertebral [pNHNV], and distal non-hip non-vertebral [dNHNV]) from 2011 to 2015, who were matched (1:1) to non-fracture individuals based on sex, age, and comorbidities. All-cause 1- and 5-year overall survival and relative survival ratios (RSRs) were assessed and time trends in survival changes were characterized starting immediately after a fracture. In both sexes, overall survival was markedly decreased over 6 years of follow-up after hip, vertebral, and pNHNV fractures, and as expected, worse survival rates were observed in older patients and males. The lowest 5-year RSRs were observed after hip fractures in males (66–85 years, 51.9%–63.9%; ≥86 years, 34.5%), followed by vertebral fractures in males (66–85 years, 53.2%–69.4%; ≥86 years, 35.5%), and hip fractures in females (66–85 years, 69.8%–79.0%; ≥86 years, 52.8%). Although RSRs did not decrease as markedly after dNHNV fractures in younger patients, relatively low 5-year RSRs were observed in females (75.9%) and males (69.5%) aged ≥86 years. The greatest reduction in survival occurred within the initial month after hip, vertebral, and pNHNV fractures, indicating a high relative impact of short-term factors, with survival-reduction effects persisting over time. Therefore, the most critical period for implementing interventions aimed at improving post-fracture prognosis appears to be immediately after a fracture; however, considering the immediate need for introducing such interventions, primary fracture prevention is also crucial to prevent the occurrence of the initial fracture in high-risk patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBMR Plus
JBMR Plus Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
103
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the relationship between glycemic control and bone fragility within the UK Biobank: observational and one-sample Mendelian randomization analyses. Correction to: Prevalence and risk factors for atypical femoral fracture among Lebanese patients with hip and shaft fractures. In nondiabetic C57BL/6J mice, canagliflozin affects the skeleton in a sex- and age-dependent manner. Genotype-phenotype correlations in 294 pediatric patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Prevalence of chondrocalcinosis and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease in a cohort of adult patients with low alkaline phosphatase levels and a positive versus negative genetic ALPL study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1