心理健康目标设定:为职业治疗实践提供信息的范围界定审查

Q3 Health Professions Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1108/ijot-03-2023-0007
Yuho Okita, Takao Kaneko, Hiroaki Imai, Monique Nair, K. Tomori
{"title":"心理健康目标设定:为职业治疗实践提供信息的范围界定审查","authors":"Yuho Okita, Takao Kaneko, Hiroaki Imai, Monique Nair, K. Tomori","doi":"10.1108/ijot-03-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nGoal setting is a crucial aspect of client-centered practice in occupational therapy (OT) for mental health conditions. However, it remains to be seen how goal-setting has been delivered in mental health, particularly the OT process. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the nature and extent of goal setting delivered in mental health and informed OT practice.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors followed the guidelines of Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and searched three databases using key search terms: “mental disorder,” “goal setting,” and “occupational therapy” and their synonyms.\n\n\nFindings\nAfter excluding duplicate records, the authors initially screened 883 records and resulted in 20 records in total after the screening process. Most of the identified articles used goal-setting delivered by both a health professional and a client (n = 14), and focused on people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (n = 13), but three interventions were delivered by occupational therapists. Further research needs on goal-setting in mental health OT, exploring the reliability and validity of different goal-setting strategies and investigating the effectiveness of goal-setting for promoting behavior change and client engagement across various mental health conditions and settings.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe scoping review has some limitations, such as not investigating the validity and reliability of goal-setting strategies identified, and excluding conference papers and non-English articles.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis scoping review presents a mapping of how goal-setting has been delivered in mental health and informed OT practice. The findings suggest limited research in OT and highlight the need for more studies to address the evidence gap in individualized client-centered OT.\n","PeriodicalId":36571,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goal setting in mental health: a scoping review to inform occupational therapy practice\",\"authors\":\"Yuho Okita, Takao Kaneko, Hiroaki Imai, Monique Nair, K. Tomori\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijot-03-2023-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nGoal setting is a crucial aspect of client-centered practice in occupational therapy (OT) for mental health conditions. However, it remains to be seen how goal-setting has been delivered in mental health, particularly the OT process. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the nature and extent of goal setting delivered in mental health and informed OT practice.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors followed the guidelines of Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and searched three databases using key search terms: “mental disorder,” “goal setting,” and “occupational therapy” and their synonyms.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAfter excluding duplicate records, the authors initially screened 883 records and resulted in 20 records in total after the screening process. Most of the identified articles used goal-setting delivered by both a health professional and a client (n = 14), and focused on people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (n = 13), but three interventions were delivered by occupational therapists. Further research needs on goal-setting in mental health OT, exploring the reliability and validity of different goal-setting strategies and investigating the effectiveness of goal-setting for promoting behavior change and client engagement across various mental health conditions and settings.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe scoping review has some limitations, such as not investigating the validity and reliability of goal-setting strategies identified, and excluding conference papers and non-English articles.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis scoping review presents a mapping of how goal-setting has been delivered in mental health and informed OT practice. The findings suggest limited research in OT and highlight the need for more studies to address the evidence gap in individualized client-centered OT.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"24 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijot-03-2023-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijot-03-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的目标设定是心理健康职业疗法(OT)中以客户为中心的实践的一个重要方面。然而,在心理健康领域,尤其是在职业治疗过程中,目标设定是如何实施的还有待观察。作者遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)的指导方针,使用关键检索词搜索了三个数据库:"结果在排除重复记录后,作者初步筛选了 883 条记录,经过筛选后共获得 20 条记录。在已确定的文章中,大多数文章都使用了由医疗专业人员和客户共同实施的目标设定方法(14 篇),并以精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍患者为研究对象(13 篇),但有三篇干预文章是由职业治疗师实施的。研究局限性/影响该范围界定综述存在一些局限性,如未对已确定的目标设定策略的有效性和可靠性进行调查,未包括会议论文和非英文文章。研究结果表明,OT 领域的研究有限,并强调有必要开展更多研究,以填补以客户为中心的个性化 OT 的证据缺口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Goal setting in mental health: a scoping review to inform occupational therapy practice
Purpose Goal setting is a crucial aspect of client-centered practice in occupational therapy (OT) for mental health conditions. However, it remains to be seen how goal-setting has been delivered in mental health, particularly the OT process. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the nature and extent of goal setting delivered in mental health and informed OT practice. Design/methodology/approach The authors followed the guidelines of Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and searched three databases using key search terms: “mental disorder,” “goal setting,” and “occupational therapy” and their synonyms. Findings After excluding duplicate records, the authors initially screened 883 records and resulted in 20 records in total after the screening process. Most of the identified articles used goal-setting delivered by both a health professional and a client (n = 14), and focused on people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (n = 13), but three interventions were delivered by occupational therapists. Further research needs on goal-setting in mental health OT, exploring the reliability and validity of different goal-setting strategies and investigating the effectiveness of goal-setting for promoting behavior change and client engagement across various mental health conditions and settings. Research limitations/implications The scoping review has some limitations, such as not investigating the validity and reliability of goal-setting strategies identified, and excluding conference papers and non-English articles. Originality/value This scoping review presents a mapping of how goal-setting has been delivered in mental health and informed OT practice. The findings suggest limited research in OT and highlight the need for more studies to address the evidence gap in individualized client-centered OT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Driving innovation: harnessing the power of patient input in research Current clinical practice of Irish physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the assessment and treatment of spasticity in adults Scoping review of free evidence summary sources available online, relevant to occupational therapists working with children/youth, and families Exploring the non-vocational outcomes of the individual placement and support (IPS) employment model Attention Autism™ training for occupational therapists: a pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1