{"title":"综合姑息肿瘤学对医疗系统负担的影响","authors":"Jackson Brandon, J. McCollom","doi":"10.18060/27950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Early integration of palliative care in oncology has been shown to benefit patients on an individual level, especially regarding mood and quality of life. These patients both have a difficult disease course – where palliative care can help with interpersonal, spiritual, physical, and care planning concerns – and represent a substantial burden on inpatient facilities like intensive care units and emergency departments. This study explores relationships between early palliative oncology, patient healthcare experience, and broader burden on the health system. \nMethods: A retrospective chart review was performed comparing oncology patients at Parkview Regional Medical Center in Fort Wayne, IN. Cohort A (200 patients) received palliative care along with standard oncology care while cohort B (200 patients) received standard oncology care alone. Post-diagnosis emergency department visits, inpatient stays, and intensive care unit stays were compared. So were in-hospital deaths, referrals to hospice, and record of advance care planning documents. \nResults: Two endpoints evaluated by Chi2 analysis were statistically significant (p values <0.01): Cohort A was more likely than cohort B to be referred to hospice (79.5% vs 31.5%) and more likely to have advance care planning documents on file (38.5% vs 21%). Additionally, a T-test showed statistically significant difference (p=.001) for inpatient stays post-palliative care encounter versus patients who had no palliative care (1.75 vs 2.41). \n Conclusion: This study shows correlation between integrated oncology care with patients filing ACP documents and being referred to hospice. Additionally, it finds that cancer patients who visit the palliative care office have fewer inpatient stays after their visit than those who don’t visit at all. \n Future Implications: Future studies in this area should explore the latter finding from new perspectives, perhaps focusing on the differences between palliative care visit promptly after diagnosis/staging and palliative care implemented long after diagnosis/staging or not administered at all. ","PeriodicalId":20522,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IMPRS","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Integrative Palliative Oncology on Health System Burden\",\"authors\":\"Jackson Brandon, J. McCollom\",\"doi\":\"10.18060/27950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Early integration of palliative care in oncology has been shown to benefit patients on an individual level, especially regarding mood and quality of life. These patients both have a difficult disease course – where palliative care can help with interpersonal, spiritual, physical, and care planning concerns – and represent a substantial burden on inpatient facilities like intensive care units and emergency departments. This study explores relationships between early palliative oncology, patient healthcare experience, and broader burden on the health system. \\nMethods: A retrospective chart review was performed comparing oncology patients at Parkview Regional Medical Center in Fort Wayne, IN. Cohort A (200 patients) received palliative care along with standard oncology care while cohort B (200 patients) received standard oncology care alone. Post-diagnosis emergency department visits, inpatient stays, and intensive care unit stays were compared. So were in-hospital deaths, referrals to hospice, and record of advance care planning documents. \\nResults: Two endpoints evaluated by Chi2 analysis were statistically significant (p values <0.01): Cohort A was more likely than cohort B to be referred to hospice (79.5% vs 31.5%) and more likely to have advance care planning documents on file (38.5% vs 21%). Additionally, a T-test showed statistically significant difference (p=.001) for inpatient stays post-palliative care encounter versus patients who had no palliative care (1.75 vs 2.41). \\n Conclusion: This study shows correlation between integrated oncology care with patients filing ACP documents and being referred to hospice. Additionally, it finds that cancer patients who visit the palliative care office have fewer inpatient stays after their visit than those who don’t visit at all. \\n Future Implications: Future studies in this area should explore the latter finding from new perspectives, perhaps focusing on the differences between palliative care visit promptly after diagnosis/staging and palliative care implemented long after diagnosis/staging or not administered at all. \",\"PeriodicalId\":20522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IMPRS\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IMPRS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18060/27950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IMPRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:事实证明,将姑息关怀尽早纳入肿瘤治疗可使患者个人受益,尤其是在情绪和生活质量方面。这些患者的病程艰难,姑息关怀可以帮助他们解决人际交往、精神、身体和护理计划等方面的问题,同时也给重症监护病房和急诊科等住院设施带来了沉重负担。本研究探讨了早期肿瘤姑息治疗、病人的医疗体验和医疗系统的更广泛负担之间的关系。 研究方法对印第安纳州韦恩堡帕克维尤地区医疗中心的肿瘤患者进行了回顾性病历审查。队列 A(200 名患者)在接受标准肿瘤治疗的同时接受姑息治疗,队列 B(200 名患者)则只接受标准肿瘤治疗。对诊断后的急诊就诊率、住院时间和重症监护室停留时间进行了比较。此外,还对院内死亡、转诊至临终关怀机构以及预先护理计划文件的记录进行了比较。 结果:通过Chi2分析评估的两个终点具有统计学意义(P值小于0.01):队列 A 比队列 B 更有可能被转诊至临终关怀机构(79.5% 对 31.5%),也更有可能拥有预先医疗规划文件(38.5% 对 21%)。此外,T检验显示,接受姑息关怀后的住院时间与未接受姑息关怀的患者住院时间(1.75 vs 2.41)之间存在显著差异(p=.001)。 结论这项研究表明,肿瘤综合治疗与患者提交 ACP 文件和被转诊至临终关怀机构之间存在相关性。此外,研究还发现,到姑息关怀办公室就诊的癌症患者在就诊后的住院时间少于未就诊的患者。 未来意义:该领域的未来研究应从新的角度探讨后一项发现,或许可以重点研究在确诊/分期后立即就诊的姑息关怀与确诊/分期后很久才实施姑息关怀或根本就不实施姑息关怀之间的差异。
The Effects of Integrative Palliative Oncology on Health System Burden
Background: Early integration of palliative care in oncology has been shown to benefit patients on an individual level, especially regarding mood and quality of life. These patients both have a difficult disease course – where palliative care can help with interpersonal, spiritual, physical, and care planning concerns – and represent a substantial burden on inpatient facilities like intensive care units and emergency departments. This study explores relationships between early palliative oncology, patient healthcare experience, and broader burden on the health system.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed comparing oncology patients at Parkview Regional Medical Center in Fort Wayne, IN. Cohort A (200 patients) received palliative care along with standard oncology care while cohort B (200 patients) received standard oncology care alone. Post-diagnosis emergency department visits, inpatient stays, and intensive care unit stays were compared. So were in-hospital deaths, referrals to hospice, and record of advance care planning documents.
Results: Two endpoints evaluated by Chi2 analysis were statistically significant (p values <0.01): Cohort A was more likely than cohort B to be referred to hospice (79.5% vs 31.5%) and more likely to have advance care planning documents on file (38.5% vs 21%). Additionally, a T-test showed statistically significant difference (p=.001) for inpatient stays post-palliative care encounter versus patients who had no palliative care (1.75 vs 2.41).
Conclusion: This study shows correlation between integrated oncology care with patients filing ACP documents and being referred to hospice. Additionally, it finds that cancer patients who visit the palliative care office have fewer inpatient stays after their visit than those who don’t visit at all.
Future Implications: Future studies in this area should explore the latter finding from new perspectives, perhaps focusing on the differences between palliative care visit promptly after diagnosis/staging and palliative care implemented long after diagnosis/staging or not administered at all.