印第安纳波利斯芬太尼及其类似物尿液药物筛查阳性率

Jennifer Beckman, Elizabeth Mast, David Shepherd, Michelle K. Zimmerman, Rejwi Dahal
{"title":"印第安纳波利斯芬太尼及其类似物尿液药物筛查阳性率","authors":"Jennifer Beckman, Elizabeth Mast, David Shepherd, Michelle K. Zimmerman, Rejwi Dahal","doi":"10.18060/27843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Hypothesis: IU Health Pathology Laboratory (IUHPL) recently added qualitative fentanyl screening to its test menu. However, fentanyl screening is not currently part of the urine drugs of abuse (DAU) panel which includes amphetamine, barbiturates,benzodiazepines, buprenorphine, cannabinoids, methadone, cocaine, opiates, oxycodone, and phencyclidine. Since fentanyl screen is a standalone test, we were interested in determining how often specimens had this ordered in conjunction with the DAU, as we suspected not all of them did. Our hypothesis was that positive urine drug screens may also be positive for fentanyl/fentanyl analogs. \nProject Methods: Urine specimens sent for routine drug screens at IU Health Arnett, Ball, Bloomington, and IUHPL between June and mid-July 2023 were subjected to fentanyl screening. Specimen that screened positive were confirmed by LC-MS/MS for presence offentanyl and norfentanyl. Additionally, specimens were tested for 4ANPP (fentanyl precursor) and xylazine; if they were positive for either, they were sent to an outside laboratory to ascertain if other fentanyl analogs or designer opioids were present. \nResults: Of the 1,893 DAU specimens received, 51.2% were positive for at least one drug class. Only 28 had an associated fentanyl screen order. Cannabinoids represented the most prevalent drug class with a 26.7% positivity rate. Only 1,724 samples were available to screen for fentanyl as part of this study. Of these, 214 specimens were positive for fentanyl, with a positivity screen rate of 12.4%. Confirmatory testing by LC-MS/MS indicated 206 of the 214 were true positives. \nConclusion and Impact: These results highlight the need for fentanyl testing and continued clinician education to increase awareness about the inability of standard urine drug screens to detect fentanyl. Dialogue between patients and clinicians would potentially decrease overdoses and/or result in more treatment referrals. Additionally, integrating fentanyl screening into the DAU panel will facilitate qualitative fentanyl testing.","PeriodicalId":20522,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IMPRS","volume":" 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Positive Urine Drug Screen for Fentanyl and its Analogs in Indianapolis\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Beckman, Elizabeth Mast, David Shepherd, Michelle K. Zimmerman, Rejwi Dahal\",\"doi\":\"10.18060/27843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Hypothesis: IU Health Pathology Laboratory (IUHPL) recently added qualitative fentanyl screening to its test menu. However, fentanyl screening is not currently part of the urine drugs of abuse (DAU) panel which includes amphetamine, barbiturates,benzodiazepines, buprenorphine, cannabinoids, methadone, cocaine, opiates, oxycodone, and phencyclidine. Since fentanyl screen is a standalone test, we were interested in determining how often specimens had this ordered in conjunction with the DAU, as we suspected not all of them did. Our hypothesis was that positive urine drug screens may also be positive for fentanyl/fentanyl analogs. \\nProject Methods: Urine specimens sent for routine drug screens at IU Health Arnett, Ball, Bloomington, and IUHPL between June and mid-July 2023 were subjected to fentanyl screening. Specimen that screened positive were confirmed by LC-MS/MS for presence offentanyl and norfentanyl. Additionally, specimens were tested for 4ANPP (fentanyl precursor) and xylazine; if they were positive for either, they were sent to an outside laboratory to ascertain if other fentanyl analogs or designer opioids were present. \\nResults: Of the 1,893 DAU specimens received, 51.2% were positive for at least one drug class. Only 28 had an associated fentanyl screen order. Cannabinoids represented the most prevalent drug class with a 26.7% positivity rate. Only 1,724 samples were available to screen for fentanyl as part of this study. Of these, 214 specimens were positive for fentanyl, with a positivity screen rate of 12.4%. Confirmatory testing by LC-MS/MS indicated 206 of the 214 were true positives. \\nConclusion and Impact: These results highlight the need for fentanyl testing and continued clinician education to increase awareness about the inability of standard urine drug screens to detect fentanyl. Dialogue between patients and clinicians would potentially decrease overdoses and/or result in more treatment referrals. Additionally, integrating fentanyl screening into the DAU panel will facilitate qualitative fentanyl testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IMPRS\",\"volume\":\" 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IMPRS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18060/27843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IMPRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与假设:IU 健康病理实验室(IUHPL)最近在其检验菜单中增加了芬太尼定性筛查。然而,芬太尼筛查目前并不属于尿液滥用药物(DAU)检测项目,该项目包括苯丙胺、巴比妥类药物、苯二氮卓类药物、丁丙诺啡、大麻类药物、美沙酮、可卡因、阿片剂、羟考酮和苯环利定。由于芬太尼筛查是一项独立的检测项目,我们有兴趣确定标本在进行 DAU 检测的同时进行芬太尼筛查的频率,因为我们怀疑并非所有标本都进行了芬太尼筛查。我们的假设是,尿液药物筛查阳性也可能是芬太尼/芬太尼类似物阳性。项目方法:对 2023 年 6 月至 7 月中旬期间送往 IU Health Arnett、Ball、Bloomington 和 IUHPL 进行常规药物筛查的尿液标本进行芬太尼筛查。筛查呈阳性的标本通过 LC-MS/MS 确认是否含有芬太尼和诺芬太尼。此外,还对标本进行了 4ANPP(芬太尼前体)和异丙嗪检测;如果其中任何一种检测结果呈阳性,则将标本送至外部实验室,以确定是否存在其他芬太尼类似物或特制阿片类药物。结果:在收到的 1,893 份 DAU 标本中,51.2% 的标本至少对一种药物呈阳性反应。只有 28 份样本有相关的芬太尼筛查指令。大麻类是最常见的毒品类别,阳性率为 26.7%。作为本研究的一部分,只有 1724 份样本可用于芬太尼筛查。其中 214 份样本的芬太尼检测结果呈阳性,阳性筛查率为 12.4%。通过 LC-MS/MS 进行的确认测试表明,214 份样本中有 206 份样本呈阳性。结论和影响:这些结果凸显了对芬太尼检测的需求,以及继续开展临床医生教育以提高对标准尿液药物筛查无法检测芬太尼的认识的必要性。患者和临床医生之间的对话将有可能减少过量用药和/或导致更多的治疗转介。此外,将芬太尼筛查纳入 DAU 面板将促进芬太尼定性检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of Positive Urine Drug Screen for Fentanyl and its Analogs in Indianapolis
Background and Hypothesis: IU Health Pathology Laboratory (IUHPL) recently added qualitative fentanyl screening to its test menu. However, fentanyl screening is not currently part of the urine drugs of abuse (DAU) panel which includes amphetamine, barbiturates,benzodiazepines, buprenorphine, cannabinoids, methadone, cocaine, opiates, oxycodone, and phencyclidine. Since fentanyl screen is a standalone test, we were interested in determining how often specimens had this ordered in conjunction with the DAU, as we suspected not all of them did. Our hypothesis was that positive urine drug screens may also be positive for fentanyl/fentanyl analogs. Project Methods: Urine specimens sent for routine drug screens at IU Health Arnett, Ball, Bloomington, and IUHPL between June and mid-July 2023 were subjected to fentanyl screening. Specimen that screened positive were confirmed by LC-MS/MS for presence offentanyl and norfentanyl. Additionally, specimens were tested for 4ANPP (fentanyl precursor) and xylazine; if they were positive for either, they were sent to an outside laboratory to ascertain if other fentanyl analogs or designer opioids were present. Results: Of the 1,893 DAU specimens received, 51.2% were positive for at least one drug class. Only 28 had an associated fentanyl screen order. Cannabinoids represented the most prevalent drug class with a 26.7% positivity rate. Only 1,724 samples were available to screen for fentanyl as part of this study. Of these, 214 specimens were positive for fentanyl, with a positivity screen rate of 12.4%. Confirmatory testing by LC-MS/MS indicated 206 of the 214 were true positives. Conclusion and Impact: These results highlight the need for fentanyl testing and continued clinician education to increase awareness about the inability of standard urine drug screens to detect fentanyl. Dialogue between patients and clinicians would potentially decrease overdoses and/or result in more treatment referrals. Additionally, integrating fentanyl screening into the DAU panel will facilitate qualitative fentanyl testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extracranial Meningioma Metastasis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Outcomes Intraventricular Ependymoma in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes Intraventricular Ependymoma in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes Extracranial Meningioma Metastasis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Outcomes Exploring Differentiation and TEAD Inhibition in NF2-Knockdown NES Cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1