世俗化背景下的礼仪运动:现代晚期的发展

Q3 Arts and Humanities Studia Liturgica Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1177/00393207231224499
Marie Rosenius
{"title":"世俗化背景下的礼仪运动:现代晚期的发展","authors":"Marie Rosenius","doi":"10.1177/00393207231224499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article highlights secular influences in contemporary understandings of liturgical participation by exploring the relationship between visions of the early modern liturgical movement and contemporary ways of understanding participation in the Church of Sweden. The constructs opine, understand, and do are used in the comparison as are the concepts participatio plena, participatio conscia, and participatio actuosa in Sacrosanctum Concilium. An overall reflection based on the analysis is that secular ideologies and trends not only influence liturgical form but tend to erode theological language itself. Religious individualism, combined with “internal ecclesial secularization,” tends to imbue the very understanding of church and of liturgy. A new phase in the liturgical movement called the “late modern liturgical movement” is discussed. The church appears here as the “church of the individual” and the liturgy in the sense of ordo is seen as an “open” order and framework, rather than as juxtaposition and sacramental event.","PeriodicalId":39597,"journal":{"name":"Studia Liturgica","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Liturgical Movement in Context of Secularization: Late Modern Developments\",\"authors\":\"Marie Rosenius\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00393207231224499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article highlights secular influences in contemporary understandings of liturgical participation by exploring the relationship between visions of the early modern liturgical movement and contemporary ways of understanding participation in the Church of Sweden. The constructs opine, understand, and do are used in the comparison as are the concepts participatio plena, participatio conscia, and participatio actuosa in Sacrosanctum Concilium. An overall reflection based on the analysis is that secular ideologies and trends not only influence liturgical form but tend to erode theological language itself. Religious individualism, combined with “internal ecclesial secularization,” tends to imbue the very understanding of church and of liturgy. A new phase in the liturgical movement called the “late modern liturgical movement” is discussed. The church appears here as the “church of the individual” and the liturgy in the sense of ordo is seen as an “open” order and framework, rather than as juxtaposition and sacramental event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Liturgica\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Liturgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00393207231224499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Liturgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00393207231224499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章通过探讨早期现代礼仪运动的愿景与当代理解瑞典教会参与方式之间的关系,强调了当代对礼仪参与理解的世俗影响。在比较中使用了opine、understand和do等概念,以及《圣训》中的participatio plena、participatio conscia和participatio actuosa等概念。根据分析得出的总体反思是,世俗意识形态和趋势不仅影响礼仪形式,而且有侵蚀神学语言本身的趋势。宗教个人主义与 "教会内部世俗化 "相结合,往往会影响对教会和礼仪的理解。本文讨论了礼仪运动的一个新阶段,即 "晚期现代礼仪运动"。在这里,教会被视为 "个人的教会",而礼仪在 ordo 的意义上被视为一种 "开放的 "秩序和框架,而非并置和圣事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Liturgical Movement in Context of Secularization: Late Modern Developments
The article highlights secular influences in contemporary understandings of liturgical participation by exploring the relationship between visions of the early modern liturgical movement and contemporary ways of understanding participation in the Church of Sweden. The constructs opine, understand, and do are used in the comparison as are the concepts participatio plena, participatio conscia, and participatio actuosa in Sacrosanctum Concilium. An overall reflection based on the analysis is that secular ideologies and trends not only influence liturgical form but tend to erode theological language itself. Religious individualism, combined with “internal ecclesial secularization,” tends to imbue the very understanding of church and of liturgy. A new phase in the liturgical movement called the “late modern liturgical movement” is discussed. The church appears here as the “church of the individual” and the liturgy in the sense of ordo is seen as an “open” order and framework, rather than as juxtaposition and sacramental event.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Liturgica
Studia Liturgica Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Ministry in the Highland Countries: Lay Readership and Ordained Ministry in the Swiss Reformed Church and the Church of Scotland From Interdenominational to Interreligious Ecumenism at Taizé and Le Jour du Seigneur Liturgical Formation through Ecumenical Experiences:Insights from Inter-University and Inter-Confessional Lectures Identifying Diversity for Promoting Unity: A Liturgical and Systematic Theological Exploration of Involved Risks Sharing of Liturgical, Theological, and Ecumenical Gifts: A Quest for a Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1