行人在信号灯控制交叉路口时间压力影响下的时间和空间遵从行为:行人模拟器研究

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtte.2023.04.010
Apurwa Dhoke, Pushpa Choudhary
{"title":"行人在信号灯控制交叉路口时间压力影响下的时间和空间遵从行为:行人模拟器研究","authors":"Apurwa Dhoke,&nbsp;Pushpa Choudhary","doi":"10.1016/j.jtte.2023.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pedestrian safety is at high stakes due to the non-compliance practices of pedestrians at signalized intersections. Additionally, when pedestrians are hurrying, they deliberately engage in such unsafe behaviour. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand how time pressure (i.e., feeling of hurry or saving time) affected pedestrians' decisions to follow traffic rules at signalized junctions. To achieve the study objectives, a pedestrian simulator setup was used to collect the crossing behaviour of forty participants at a four-legged signalized intersection. Non-compliance, one of the riskiest pedestrian behaviours, was examined with respect to three different forms, comprising dangerous temporal non-compliance (D-TNC), non-dangerous temporal non-compliance (ND-TNC), and spatial non-compliance (SNC) behaviour under two distinct conditions: baseline (i.e., no time pressure) and time pressure conditions. The effects of demographics, usual walking features, and time pressure on D-TNC and ND-TNC were investigated using a multinomial regression model, while SNC behaviour was investigated using a binary regression model. It was interesting to note that the majority of the factors related to pedestrians’ usual walking behaviour had an impact on all kinds of non-compliance behaviours. Importantly, the results also showcased that time pressure had a contrasting impact on D-TNC and ND-TNC behaviour whereas SNC behaviour increased under time pressure. Additionally, the varying impacts of D-TNC, ND-TNC, and SNC were also reflected in the occurrence of the crashes, which were probably triggered by discrepancies in the influence of time pressure on non-compliance behaviours. These findings highlight the need for technical solutions, educational outreach, and efficient enforcement practices to reduce pedestrians' non-compliant behaviour.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 55-68"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756424000047/pdfft?md5=ff536df27ec313409ed6163816f66d31&pid=1-s2.0-S2095756424000047-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal and spatial compliance behaviour of pedestrians under the influence of time pressure at signalized intersections: A pedestrian simulator study\",\"authors\":\"Apurwa Dhoke,&nbsp;Pushpa Choudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtte.2023.04.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pedestrian safety is at high stakes due to the non-compliance practices of pedestrians at signalized intersections. Additionally, when pedestrians are hurrying, they deliberately engage in such unsafe behaviour. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand how time pressure (i.e., feeling of hurry or saving time) affected pedestrians' decisions to follow traffic rules at signalized junctions. To achieve the study objectives, a pedestrian simulator setup was used to collect the crossing behaviour of forty participants at a four-legged signalized intersection. Non-compliance, one of the riskiest pedestrian behaviours, was examined with respect to three different forms, comprising dangerous temporal non-compliance (D-TNC), non-dangerous temporal non-compliance (ND-TNC), and spatial non-compliance (SNC) behaviour under two distinct conditions: baseline (i.e., no time pressure) and time pressure conditions. The effects of demographics, usual walking features, and time pressure on D-TNC and ND-TNC were investigated using a multinomial regression model, while SNC behaviour was investigated using a binary regression model. It was interesting to note that the majority of the factors related to pedestrians’ usual walking behaviour had an impact on all kinds of non-compliance behaviours. Importantly, the results also showcased that time pressure had a contrasting impact on D-TNC and ND-TNC behaviour whereas SNC behaviour increased under time pressure. Additionally, the varying impacts of D-TNC, ND-TNC, and SNC were also reflected in the occurrence of the crashes, which were probably triggered by discrepancies in the influence of time pressure on non-compliance behaviours. These findings highlight the need for technical solutions, educational outreach, and efficient enforcement practices to reduce pedestrians' non-compliant behaviour.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 55-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756424000047/pdfft?md5=ff536df27ec313409ed6163816f66d31&pid=1-s2.0-S2095756424000047-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756424000047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756424000047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于行人在有信号灯的十字路口不遵守交通规则,行人安全受到严重威胁。此外,当行人赶时间时,他们会故意做出这种不安全的行为。因此,本研究旨在了解时间压力(即赶时间或节省时间的感觉)如何影响行人在信号灯路口遵守交通规则的决定。为实现研究目标,研究人员使用行人模拟器收集了 40 名参与者在四脚信号灯路口的过街行为。在基线(即无时间压力)和时间压力两种不同条件下,对行人最危险的行为之一--不遵守行为进行了研究,包括三种不同形式的危险时间不遵守行为(D-TNC)、非危险时间不遵守行为(ND-TNC)和空间不遵守行为(SNC)。使用多项式回归模型研究了人口统计学、惯常行走特征和时间压力对 D-TNC 和 ND-TNC 的影响,而使用二元回归模型研究了 SNC 行为。有趣的是,与行人惯常步行行为有关的大多数因素都对各种违规行为产生了影响。重要的是,研究结果还表明,时间压力对 D-TNC 和 ND-TNC 行为的影响截然不同,而 SNC 行为则在时间压力下有所增加。此外,D-TNC、ND-TNC 和 SNC 的不同影响也反映在碰撞事故的发生上,这可能是由于时间压力对违规行为的影响不同而引发的。这些研究结果突出表明,需要通过技术解决方案、教育推广和有效的执法实践来减少行人的违规行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporal and spatial compliance behaviour of pedestrians under the influence of time pressure at signalized intersections: A pedestrian simulator study

Pedestrian safety is at high stakes due to the non-compliance practices of pedestrians at signalized intersections. Additionally, when pedestrians are hurrying, they deliberately engage in such unsafe behaviour. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand how time pressure (i.e., feeling of hurry or saving time) affected pedestrians' decisions to follow traffic rules at signalized junctions. To achieve the study objectives, a pedestrian simulator setup was used to collect the crossing behaviour of forty participants at a four-legged signalized intersection. Non-compliance, one of the riskiest pedestrian behaviours, was examined with respect to three different forms, comprising dangerous temporal non-compliance (D-TNC), non-dangerous temporal non-compliance (ND-TNC), and spatial non-compliance (SNC) behaviour under two distinct conditions: baseline (i.e., no time pressure) and time pressure conditions. The effects of demographics, usual walking features, and time pressure on D-TNC and ND-TNC were investigated using a multinomial regression model, while SNC behaviour was investigated using a binary regression model. It was interesting to note that the majority of the factors related to pedestrians’ usual walking behaviour had an impact on all kinds of non-compliance behaviours. Importantly, the results also showcased that time pressure had a contrasting impact on D-TNC and ND-TNC behaviour whereas SNC behaviour increased under time pressure. Additionally, the varying impacts of D-TNC, ND-TNC, and SNC were also reflected in the occurrence of the crashes, which were probably triggered by discrepancies in the influence of time pressure on non-compliance behaviours. These findings highlight the need for technical solutions, educational outreach, and efficient enforcement practices to reduce pedestrians' non-compliant behaviour.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.30%
发文量
402
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) serves as a renowned academic platform facilitating the exchange and exploration of innovative ideas in the realm of transportation. Our journal aims to foster theoretical and experimental research in transportation and welcomes the submission of exceptional peer-reviewed papers on engineering, planning, management, and information technology. We are dedicated to expediting the peer review process and ensuring timely publication of top-notch research in this field.
期刊最新文献
Potential applications for composite utilization of rubber and plastic in asphalt pavements: A critical review Design equations for maximum stress concentration factors for concrete-filled steel tubular K-joints A systematic review of digital twins for electric vehicles Architecture, application, and prospect of digital twin for highway infrastructure Assessing the risk of pedestrian crossing behavior on suburban roads using structural equation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1