Sarah A. Mullen , Emma L. Myers , Rebecca L. Brenner , Kim T. Nguyen , Tara A. Harper , Darby Welsh , Storm Keffer , Jenna Mueller , Melodi Javid Whitley
{"title":"皮肤疣局部治疗方法的系统性综述","authors":"Sarah A. Mullen , Emma L. Myers , Rebecca L. Brenner , Kim T. Nguyen , Tara A. Harper , Darby Welsh , Storm Keffer , Jenna Mueller , Melodi Javid Whitley","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intralesional therapies are used for recalcitrant warts, but no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment exists nor is there consensus regarding the most efficacious therapy. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize efficacy and adverse events reported in 62 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of intralesional therapies for cutaneous warts. The most studied intralesional therapies included measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine (n = 24 studies), purified protein derivative (PPD) (n = 19 studies), vitamin D3 (n = 15 studies), and Candida antigen (n = 14 studies). Most studies included adult and pediatric patients or adults alone, with only 4 studies on pediatric patients alone. MMR vaccine was the most studied treatment (n = 853 patients). MMR had a complete response rate of 27–90%. The next most common treatment, PPD, had a complete response rate of 45–87%. Other treatments included Candida antigen and vitamin D3, with complete response rates of 25–84% and 40–96%, respectively. The most frequent side effects were injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms. This systematic review represents a useful summary of intralesional therapy RCTs for clinician reference. This study also highlights the lack of large multi-institutional RCTs, despite many patients being treated for this widespread problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000109/pdfft?md5=cf21b5dcafa5a1711fe7695ee5532160&pid=1-s2.0-S2667026724000109-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Intralesional Therapies for Cutaneous Warts\",\"authors\":\"Sarah A. Mullen , Emma L. Myers , Rebecca L. Brenner , Kim T. Nguyen , Tara A. Harper , Darby Welsh , Storm Keffer , Jenna Mueller , Melodi Javid Whitley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Intralesional therapies are used for recalcitrant warts, but no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment exists nor is there consensus regarding the most efficacious therapy. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize efficacy and adverse events reported in 62 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of intralesional therapies for cutaneous warts. The most studied intralesional therapies included measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine (n = 24 studies), purified protein derivative (PPD) (n = 19 studies), vitamin D3 (n = 15 studies), and Candida antigen (n = 14 studies). Most studies included adult and pediatric patients or adults alone, with only 4 studies on pediatric patients alone. MMR vaccine was the most studied treatment (n = 853 patients). MMR had a complete response rate of 27–90%. The next most common treatment, PPD, had a complete response rate of 45–87%. Other treatments included Candida antigen and vitamin D3, with complete response rates of 25–84% and 40–96%, respectively. The most frequent side effects were injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms. This systematic review represents a useful summary of intralesional therapy RCTs for clinician reference. This study also highlights the lack of large multi-institutional RCTs, despite many patients being treated for this widespread problem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000109/pdfft?md5=cf21b5dcafa5a1711fe7695ee5532160&pid=1-s2.0-S2667026724000109-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic Review of Intralesional Therapies for Cutaneous Warts
Intralesional therapies are used for recalcitrant warts, but no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment exists nor is there consensus regarding the most efficacious therapy. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize efficacy and adverse events reported in 62 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of intralesional therapies for cutaneous warts. The most studied intralesional therapies included measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine (n = 24 studies), purified protein derivative (PPD) (n = 19 studies), vitamin D3 (n = 15 studies), and Candida antigen (n = 14 studies). Most studies included adult and pediatric patients or adults alone, with only 4 studies on pediatric patients alone. MMR vaccine was the most studied treatment (n = 853 patients). MMR had a complete response rate of 27–90%. The next most common treatment, PPD, had a complete response rate of 45–87%. Other treatments included Candida antigen and vitamin D3, with complete response rates of 25–84% and 40–96%, respectively. The most frequent side effects were injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms. This systematic review represents a useful summary of intralesional therapy RCTs for clinician reference. This study also highlights the lack of large multi-institutional RCTs, despite many patients being treated for this widespread problem.