一项前瞻性、盲法、随机对照临床试验,评估合成 Electropsun 纤维基质治疗慢性糖尿病足溃疡的效果

Khalid Husain DPM, FACFAS, FACCWS , Ali Malik DPM , Jennifer Kirchens DPM , Gene Choi DPM
{"title":"一项前瞻性、盲法、随机对照临床试验,评估合成 Electropsun 纤维基质治疗慢性糖尿病足溃疡的效果","authors":"Khalid Husain DPM, FACFAS, FACCWS ,&nbsp;Ali Malik DPM ,&nbsp;Jennifer Kirchens DPM ,&nbsp;Gene Choi DPM","doi":"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix (SEFM) with standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Patients with DFUs ≤30 cm<sup>2</sup> were randomized to receive either SEFM (RESTRATA®, Acera Surgical, Inc., St. Louis, MO) or SOC weekly for up to 12 weeks. SOC included foam or alginate dressing changes. The primary endpoint measure was the percentage of wounds achieving 100 % re-epithelialization at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included decrease in wound area, time to closure, and number of applications. Forty-six subjects were enrolled and randomized into two groups. In the per protocol (PP) population, 14/19 wounds (74 %) in the SEFM Group demonstrated 100 % re-epithelialization, compared with 6/18 wounds (33 %) in the SOC Group. The proportion of wounds closed and the persistence of wound closure in the SEFM Group was statistically superior to the SOC Group (90 % CI: 0.14, 0.62 / 0.12, 0.65) (Farrington-Manning) in the PP population. Time to complete healing in the SEFM Group (6.6 ± 3.0 weeks) was significantly reduced compared to the SOC Group (<em>p</em> = 0.046, 0.026) (Cox regression) in both the ITT and PP populations. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate SEFM in the treatment of chronic DFUs and demonstrates superiority to SOC in achieving 100 % re-epithelialization within 12 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registry</h3><p>NCT04918784.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73047,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000028/pdfft?md5=d13dc9579df1e767339a35719dc6913f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667396724000028-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective, blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of the synthetic electrospun fiber matrix in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers\",\"authors\":\"Khalid Husain DPM, FACFAS, FACCWS ,&nbsp;Ali Malik DPM ,&nbsp;Jennifer Kirchens DPM ,&nbsp;Gene Choi DPM\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The goal of this randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix (SEFM) with standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Patients with DFUs ≤30 cm<sup>2</sup> were randomized to receive either SEFM (RESTRATA®, Acera Surgical, Inc., St. Louis, MO) or SOC weekly for up to 12 weeks. SOC included foam or alginate dressing changes. The primary endpoint measure was the percentage of wounds achieving 100 % re-epithelialization at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included decrease in wound area, time to closure, and number of applications. Forty-six subjects were enrolled and randomized into two groups. In the per protocol (PP) population, 14/19 wounds (74 %) in the SEFM Group demonstrated 100 % re-epithelialization, compared with 6/18 wounds (33 %) in the SOC Group. The proportion of wounds closed and the persistence of wound closure in the SEFM Group was statistically superior to the SOC Group (90 % CI: 0.14, 0.62 / 0.12, 0.65) (Farrington-Manning) in the PP population. Time to complete healing in the SEFM Group (6.6 ± 3.0 weeks) was significantly reduced compared to the SOC Group (<em>p</em> = 0.046, 0.026) (Cox regression) in both the ITT and PP populations. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate SEFM in the treatment of chronic DFUs and demonstrates superiority to SOC in achieving 100 % re-epithelialization within 12 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registry</h3><p>NCT04918784.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000028/pdfft?md5=d13dc9579df1e767339a35719dc6913f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667396724000028-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项随机对照单盲临床试验的目的是比较合成电纺纤维基质(SEFM)和标准护理(SOC)治疗糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)的疗效。DFU面积≤30平方厘米的患者被随机分配到接受SEFM(RESTRATA®,Acera Surgical, Inc.,圣路易斯,密苏里州)或SOC治疗,每周一次,最长12周。SOC包括泡沫或藻酸盐敷料更换。主要终点指标是 12 周时达到 100% 再上皮化的伤口百分比。次要终点包括伤口面积减少、伤口闭合时间和敷料使用次数。46名受试者被随机分为两组。在按方案(PP)人群中,SEFM组有14/19个伤口(74%)显示出100%的再上皮化,而SOC组有6/18个伤口(33%)显示出100%的再上皮化。在PP人群中,SEFM组伤口闭合的比例和伤口闭合的持续性在统计学上优于SOC组(90% CI:0.14, 0.62 / 0.12, 0.65)(Farrington-Manning)。在ITT和PP人群中,与SOC组相比,SEFM组的完全愈合时间(6.6 ± 3.0周)显著缩短(P = 0.046,0.026)(Cox回归)。该研究是首例评估 SEFM 治疗慢性 DFU 的随机对照试验,证明 SEFM 在 12 周内实现 100% 再上皮化方面优于 SOC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A prospective, blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of the synthetic electrospun fiber matrix in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers

The goal of this randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix (SEFM) with standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Patients with DFUs ≤30 cm2 were randomized to receive either SEFM (RESTRATA®, Acera Surgical, Inc., St. Louis, MO) or SOC weekly for up to 12 weeks. SOC included foam or alginate dressing changes. The primary endpoint measure was the percentage of wounds achieving 100 % re-epithelialization at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included decrease in wound area, time to closure, and number of applications. Forty-six subjects were enrolled and randomized into two groups. In the per protocol (PP) population, 14/19 wounds (74 %) in the SEFM Group demonstrated 100 % re-epithelialization, compared with 6/18 wounds (33 %) in the SOC Group. The proportion of wounds closed and the persistence of wound closure in the SEFM Group was statistically superior to the SOC Group (90 % CI: 0.14, 0.62 / 0.12, 0.65) (Farrington-Manning) in the PP population. Time to complete healing in the SEFM Group (6.6 ± 3.0 weeks) was significantly reduced compared to the SOC Group (p = 0.046, 0.026) (Cox regression) in both the ITT and PP populations. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate SEFM in the treatment of chronic DFUs and demonstrates superiority to SOC in achieving 100 % re-epithelialization within 12 weeks.

Clinical trial registry

NCT04918784.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.) Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Podiatry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
期刊最新文献
Interpositional arthroplasty of the fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joint with an autologous gastrocnemius aponeurosis graft: A surgical technique guide and case series Achilles hero or heel? A systematic review of popliteal nerve block for achilles repair Adenocarcinoma of the lung with metastasis to the foot: A case report MRI findings one year post-radio frequency ablation for chronic Achilles tendonosis: A case report Anatomic lateral ankle reconstruction with tendon allograft after failed brostrom. A case series and surgical technique guide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1