论同时计算双模式共享单车系统的目标库存和时间间隔

Q1 Engineering Transportation Engineering Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.treng.2024.100226
Maria Clara Martins Silva , Daniel Aloise , Sanjay Dominik Jena
{"title":"论同时计算双模式共享单车系统的目标库存和时间间隔","authors":"Maria Clara Martins Silva ,&nbsp;Daniel Aloise ,&nbsp;Sanjay Dominik Jena","doi":"10.1016/j.treng.2024.100226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The emerging demand for electric bicycles in recent years has prompted several Bike-Sharing Systems around the world to adapt their service to a new wave of commuters. Many of these systems have incorporated electric bikes into their network while still maintaining the use of regular mechanical bicycles. However, the presence of two types of bikes in a Bike-Sharing network may impact how rebalancing operations should be conducted in the system. Regular and electric bikes may exhibit distinct demand patterns throughout the day, which can hinder efficient planning of such operations. In this paper, we propose a new model that provides rebalancing recommendations based on the demand prediction for each type of bike. Additionally, we simulate the performance of our model under different scenarios, considering commuters’ varying inclination to substitute their preferred bike with one of a different type. Our empirical experiments indicate the potential of our model to improve user satisfaction, reducing the total lost demand by approximately 10%, while reducing the lost demand for electric bikes by around 30%, on average, when compared to the existing rebalancing strategy used by the real-world Bike-Sharing System under study. Remarkably, this was accomplished while maintaining an almost identical average hourly count of rebalancing operations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34480,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Engineering","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X24000010/pdfft?md5=448ed8fdd47e25689ea27489fe6459b7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666691X24000010-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the simultaneous computation of target inventories and intervals for bimodal bike-sharing systems\",\"authors\":\"Maria Clara Martins Silva ,&nbsp;Daniel Aloise ,&nbsp;Sanjay Dominik Jena\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.treng.2024.100226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The emerging demand for electric bicycles in recent years has prompted several Bike-Sharing Systems around the world to adapt their service to a new wave of commuters. Many of these systems have incorporated electric bikes into their network while still maintaining the use of regular mechanical bicycles. However, the presence of two types of bikes in a Bike-Sharing network may impact how rebalancing operations should be conducted in the system. Regular and electric bikes may exhibit distinct demand patterns throughout the day, which can hinder efficient planning of such operations. In this paper, we propose a new model that provides rebalancing recommendations based on the demand prediction for each type of bike. Additionally, we simulate the performance of our model under different scenarios, considering commuters’ varying inclination to substitute their preferred bike with one of a different type. Our empirical experiments indicate the potential of our model to improve user satisfaction, reducing the total lost demand by approximately 10%, while reducing the lost demand for electric bikes by around 30%, on average, when compared to the existing rebalancing strategy used by the real-world Bike-Sharing System under study. Remarkably, this was accomplished while maintaining an almost identical average hourly count of rebalancing operations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X24000010/pdfft?md5=448ed8fdd47e25689ea27489fe6459b7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666691X24000010-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X24000010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X24000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人们对电动自行车的需求不断增加,促使世界各地的一些共享单车系统对其服务进行调整,以适应新一轮通勤者的需求。其中许多系统已将电动自行车纳入其网络,同时仍保留普通机械自行车的使用。然而,共享单车网络中存在两种类型的自行车可能会影响系统中应如何进行再平衡操作。普通自行车和电动自行车在一天中可能会表现出不同的需求模式,这可能会阻碍此类操作的有效规划。在本文中,我们提出了一个新模型,该模型可根据每种自行车的需求预测提供再平衡建议。此外,我们还模拟了模型在不同情况下的性能,考虑了乘客用不同类型的自行车替代其首选自行车的不同倾向。我们的实证实验表明,我们的模型具有提高用户满意度的潜力,与现实世界中共享单车系统使用的现有再平衡策略相比,我们的模型可将总需求损失减少约 10%,而电动自行车的需求损失平均减少约 30%。值得注意的是,在实现这一目标的同时,重新平衡操作的每小时平均次数几乎保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the simultaneous computation of target inventories and intervals for bimodal bike-sharing systems

The emerging demand for electric bicycles in recent years has prompted several Bike-Sharing Systems around the world to adapt their service to a new wave of commuters. Many of these systems have incorporated electric bikes into their network while still maintaining the use of regular mechanical bicycles. However, the presence of two types of bikes in a Bike-Sharing network may impact how rebalancing operations should be conducted in the system. Regular and electric bikes may exhibit distinct demand patterns throughout the day, which can hinder efficient planning of such operations. In this paper, we propose a new model that provides rebalancing recommendations based on the demand prediction for each type of bike. Additionally, we simulate the performance of our model under different scenarios, considering commuters’ varying inclination to substitute their preferred bike with one of a different type. Our empirical experiments indicate the potential of our model to improve user satisfaction, reducing the total lost demand by approximately 10%, while reducing the lost demand for electric bikes by around 30%, on average, when compared to the existing rebalancing strategy used by the real-world Bike-Sharing System under study. Remarkably, this was accomplished while maintaining an almost identical average hourly count of rebalancing operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
Using sensing, statistical, and numerical analysis approaches to evaluate the effect of temperature change on the resilient performance of highway pavements Effect of aging kinetics on the fatigue behavior of asphalt mixtures incorporating various RAP contents Analysis of electric vehicle charging behaviour in existing regional public and workplace charging infrastructure: A case study in the North-East UK Effect of clay materials on phase separation in plastic bag waste-modified bitumen during high-temperature storage Low-budget equipment facilitating skid coefficient extraction for traffic accident analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1