无法通过 RNA 表达分析对法医相关的大脑解剖区域进行细分。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1007/s12024-024-00787-7
Jan Euteneuer, Lucas Moitinho-Silva, Cornelius Courts
{"title":"无法通过 RNA 表达分析对法医相关的大脑解剖区域进行细分。","authors":"Jan Euteneuer, Lucas Moitinho-Silva, Cornelius Courts","doi":"10.1007/s12024-024-00787-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The contextualization of biological traces generated by severe head injuries can be beneficial for criminal investigations. Here we aimed to identify and validate mRNA candidates for a robust sub-differentiation of forensically and traumatologically relevant brain regions. To this purpose, massively parallel sequencing of whole transcriptomes in sample material taken from four different areas of the cerebral cortex (frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital lobe) was performed, followed by bioinformatical data analysis, classification, and biostatistical candidate selection. Candidates were evaluated by Multiplex-RT-PCR and capillary electrophoresis. Only a weak relative upregulation and solely for candidates expressed in the parietal lobe was observed. Two candidates with upregulation in the cerebellar region (PVALB and CDR2L) were chosen for further investigation; however, PVALB could not reliably and repeatedly be detected in any lobe whereas CDR2L was detectable in all lobes. Consequently, we suggest that differences in mRNA expression between four regions of the cerebral cortex are too small and less pronounced to be useful for and applicable in forensic RNA analysis. We conclude that sub-differentiation of these brain regions via RNA expression analysis is generally not feasible within a forensic scope.</p>","PeriodicalId":12449,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1276-1281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forensically relevant anatomical brain regions cannot be sub-differentiated by RNA expression analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Euteneuer, Lucas Moitinho-Silva, Cornelius Courts\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12024-024-00787-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The contextualization of biological traces generated by severe head injuries can be beneficial for criminal investigations. Here we aimed to identify and validate mRNA candidates for a robust sub-differentiation of forensically and traumatologically relevant brain regions. To this purpose, massively parallel sequencing of whole transcriptomes in sample material taken from four different areas of the cerebral cortex (frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital lobe) was performed, followed by bioinformatical data analysis, classification, and biostatistical candidate selection. Candidates were evaluated by Multiplex-RT-PCR and capillary electrophoresis. Only a weak relative upregulation and solely for candidates expressed in the parietal lobe was observed. Two candidates with upregulation in the cerebellar region (PVALB and CDR2L) were chosen for further investigation; however, PVALB could not reliably and repeatedly be detected in any lobe whereas CDR2L was detectable in all lobes. Consequently, we suggest that differences in mRNA expression between four regions of the cerebral cortex are too small and less pronounced to be useful for and applicable in forensic RNA analysis. We conclude that sub-differentiation of these brain regions via RNA expression analysis is generally not feasible within a forensic scope.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1276-1281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790677/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00787-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00787-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对严重头部损伤所产生的生物痕迹进行背景分析有利于刑事调查。在此,我们旨在鉴定和验证候选 mRNA,以便对法医和创伤相关脑区进行稳健的亚分化。为此,我们对取自大脑皮层四个不同区域(额叶、颞叶、顶叶、枕叶)样本材料的全转录组进行了大规模并行测序,然后进行了生物信息学数据分析、分类和生物统计候选者选择。候选基因通过多重 RT-PCR 和毛细管电泳进行评估。只观察到微弱的相对上调,且仅在顶叶表达。我们选择了两个在小脑区域上调的候选基因(PVALB 和 CDR2L)进行进一步研究;然而,PVALB 无法在任何脑叶中可靠地重复检测到,而 CDR2L 则可在所有脑叶中检测到。因此,我们认为大脑皮层四个区域之间的 mRNA 表达差异太小且不明显,无法用于法医 RNA 分析。我们的结论是,通过 RNA 表达分析对这些脑区进行亚分化在法医范围内一般是不可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forensically relevant anatomical brain regions cannot be sub-differentiated by RNA expression analysis.

The contextualization of biological traces generated by severe head injuries can be beneficial for criminal investigations. Here we aimed to identify and validate mRNA candidates for a robust sub-differentiation of forensically and traumatologically relevant brain regions. To this purpose, massively parallel sequencing of whole transcriptomes in sample material taken from four different areas of the cerebral cortex (frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital lobe) was performed, followed by bioinformatical data analysis, classification, and biostatistical candidate selection. Candidates were evaluated by Multiplex-RT-PCR and capillary electrophoresis. Only a weak relative upregulation and solely for candidates expressed in the parietal lobe was observed. Two candidates with upregulation in the cerebellar region (PVALB and CDR2L) were chosen for further investigation; however, PVALB could not reliably and repeatedly be detected in any lobe whereas CDR2L was detectable in all lobes. Consequently, we suggest that differences in mRNA expression between four regions of the cerebral cortex are too small and less pronounced to be useful for and applicable in forensic RNA analysis. We conclude that sub-differentiation of these brain regions via RNA expression analysis is generally not feasible within a forensic scope.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology MEDICINE, LEGAL-PATHOLOGY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology encompasses all aspects of modern day forensics, equally applying to children or adults, either living or the deceased. This includes forensic science, medicine, nursing, and pathology, as well as toxicology, human identification, mass disasters/mass war graves, profiling, imaging, policing, wound assessment, sexual assault, anthropology, archeology, forensic search, entomology, botany, biology, veterinary pathology, and DNA. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology presents a balance of forensic research and reviews from around the world to reflect modern advances through peer-reviewed papers, short communications, meeting proceedings and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Invasive aspergillosis leading to fatal cerebral hemorrhage: a case report and comprehensive literature review. Exsanguination from an arteriovenous dialysis fistula: accident, suicide or medical malpractice? A singular case of complex suicide by hanging with hesitation marks by axe. Sex estimation with convolutional neural networks using the patella magnetic resonance image slices. Death in the mountains requires extensive forensic considerations and investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1