人工智能在儿科阑尾炎诊断和管理中的应用:系统综述。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1055/a-2257-5122
Robin Rey, Renato Gualtieri, Giorgio La Scala, Klara Posfay Barbe
{"title":"人工智能在儿科阑尾炎诊断和管理中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Robin Rey, Renato Gualtieri, Giorgio La Scala, Klara Posfay Barbe","doi":"10.1055/a-2257-5122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong> Artificial intelligence (AI) is a growing field in medical research that could potentially help in the challenging diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) in children. However, usefulness of AI in clinical settings remains unclear. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of AIs in the diagnosis of AA in the pediatric population through a systematic literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using the following keywords: \"pediatric,\" \"artificial intelligence,\" \"standard practices,\" and \"appendicitis,\" up to September 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 302 articles were identified and nine articles were included in the final review. Two studies had prospective validation, seven were retrospective, and no randomized control trials were found. All studies developed their own algorithms and had an accuracy greater than 90% or area under the curve >0.9. All studies were rated as a \"high risk\" concerning their overall risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> We analyzed the current status of AI in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. The application of AI shows promising potential, but the need for more rigor in study design, reporting, and transparency is urgent to facilitate its clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"385-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Management of Appendicitis in Pediatric Departments: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Robin Rey, Renato Gualtieri, Giorgio La Scala, Klara Posfay Barbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2257-5122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong> Artificial intelligence (AI) is a growing field in medical research that could potentially help in the challenging diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) in children. However, usefulness of AI in clinical settings remains unclear. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of AIs in the diagnosis of AA in the pediatric population through a systematic literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using the following keywords: \\\"pediatric,\\\" \\\"artificial intelligence,\\\" \\\"standard practices,\\\" and \\\"appendicitis,\\\" up to September 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 302 articles were identified and nine articles were included in the final review. Two studies had prospective validation, seven were retrospective, and no randomized control trials were found. All studies developed their own algorithms and had an accuracy greater than 90% or area under the curve >0.9. All studies were rated as a \\\"high risk\\\" concerning their overall risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> We analyzed the current status of AI in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. The application of AI shows promising potential, but the need for more rigor in study design, reporting, and transparency is urgent to facilitate its clinical implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"385-391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2257-5122\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2257-5122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 人工智能是医学研究中一个不断发展的领域,有可能帮助诊断儿童急性阑尾炎(AA)。然而,人工智能在临床环境中的实用性仍不明确。我们的目的是通过系统性文献综述来评估人工智能在诊断儿童急性阑尾炎方面的准确性。方法 使用以下关键词搜索 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science:"儿科"、"人工智能"、"标准实践 "和 "阑尾炎",搜索时间截至 2023 年 9 月。使用 PROBAST 对偏倚风险进行了评估。结果 共发现了 302 篇文章,最终有 9 篇文章被纳入最终综述。其中两项研究为前瞻性验证,七项为回顾性研究,未发现随机对照试验。所有研究都开发了自己的算法,准确率超过 90% 或 AUC > 0.9。所有研究的总体偏倚风险均被评为 "高风险"。结论 我们分析了人工智能在儿童阑尾炎诊断中的应用现状。人工智能的应用前景广阔,但迫切需要在研究设计、报告和透明度方面更加严格,以促进其临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Management of Appendicitis in Pediatric Departments: A Systematic Review.

Introduction:  Artificial intelligence (AI) is a growing field in medical research that could potentially help in the challenging diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) in children. However, usefulness of AI in clinical settings remains unclear. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of AIs in the diagnosis of AA in the pediatric population through a systematic literature review.

Methods:  PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using the following keywords: "pediatric," "artificial intelligence," "standard practices," and "appendicitis," up to September 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST.

Results:  A total of 302 articles were identified and nine articles were included in the final review. Two studies had prospective validation, seven were retrospective, and no randomized control trials were found. All studies developed their own algorithms and had an accuracy greater than 90% or area under the curve >0.9. All studies were rated as a "high risk" concerning their overall risk of bias.

Conclusion:  We analyzed the current status of AI in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. The application of AI shows promising potential, but the need for more rigor in study design, reporting, and transparency is urgent to facilitate its clinical implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements. You will find state-of-the-art information on: abdominal and thoracic surgery neurosurgery urology gynecology oncology orthopaedics traumatology anesthesiology child pathology embryology morphology Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Variations of the External Genitalia in Posterior Cloaca: Clinical Consequences of Misdiagnosis-A Systematic Review of the Literature and the ARM-Net Consortium Experience. Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation or Epidural Analgesia for Multimodal Pain Management after the Nuss Procedure: A Cohort Study. Evaluation of Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty with Spongioplasty-Dartosoraphy Reinforcement in Pediatric Hypospadias: A Randomized Controlled Study. Social Determinants of Health Are Associated with Failed Bowel Management for Children with Anorectal Malformations. Treatment of Anorectal Malformations in German Hospitals: Analysis of National Hospital Discharge Data from 2016 to 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1