{"title":"最新温度和哈勃数据对新兴宇宙的制约","authors":"Prasenjit Thakur","doi":"10.1007/s10509-024-04277-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, the emergent universe model (EU) is explored (as per Mukherjee <span>\\({\\mathit{et\\;al.}}\\)</span>) in a flat scenario with equation of state <span>\\((EoS)\\)</span> <span>\\(p=B\\rho -A\\rho ^{\\frac{1}{2}}\\)</span> (where <span>\\(A\\)</span> and <span>\\(B\\)</span> are constants). Here, the temperature function is evaluated in terms of the EoS parameters and redshift under the conditions of balanced particle creation and annihilation. To examine the thermodynamic evolution and find a viable EU model, constraints on its EoS parameters are determined. First, constraints on <span>\\(A_{s}\\)</span>, and <span>\\(B\\)</span> (where <span>\\(A_{s} = \\frac{A}{\\rho _{eu0}^{\\frac{1}{2}}}\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\rho _{eu0}\\)</span> is the present energy density) are obtained from the acceptable transition redshift limit <span>\\(z_{tr}\\)</span> and decoupling temperature limit <span>\\(T_{d}\\)</span> as <span>\\(A_{s}\\)</span> ≈ <span>\\((0.84-1.07)\\)</span> and <span>\\(B\\)</span> ≈ <span>\\((0.38-0.42)\\)</span> for the general EU model. Finally, stricter constraints on <span>\\(z_{tr}\\)</span> are drawn from recent <span>\\(T(z)-z\\)</span> and observed Hubble data (OHD). These <span>\\(z_{tr}\\)</span> and <span>\\(T_{d}\\)</span> values are then utilized to obtain acceptable limits on <span>\\(A_{s}\\)</span>, and <span>\\(B\\)</span>. On average, the acceptable limits on <span>\\(z_{tr}\\)</span>, <span>\\(A_{s}\\)</span>, and <span>\\(B\\)</span> are <span>\\(0.79\\pm 0.03\\)</span> (in the 1<span>\\(\\sigma \\)</span> error limit), ≈ <span>\\((1.11-1.15)\\)</span> and ≈ <span>\\((0.41-0.43)\\)</span>, respectively, for the general EU model. In the <span>\\(B=\\frac{1}{3}\\)</span> model, obtained value <span>\\(z_{tr}= 0.71\\pm 0.01\\)</span> (at the 1<span>\\(\\sigma \\)</span> level). The present values of the EoS parameters are determined, and the viability of the models is examined with plots of the deceleration parameter (<span>\\(q\\)</span>), equation of state (<span>\\(\\omega \\)</span>) and squared adiabatic sound speed (<span>\\(c^{2}_{s}\\)</span>) with redshift (<span>\\(z\\)</span>). The distance modulus (<span>\\(\\mu \\)</span>) of this EU model is compared with the HIIG and Union2.1 data. The models with <span>\\(B\\)</span> <span>\\((= -\\frac{1}{3}, 0)\\)</span>, are not suitable at all according to the present analysis, whereas, the <span>\\(B=\\frac{1}{3}\\)</span> model is quite similar to the observations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constraints on the emergent universe from recent temperature and Hubble data\",\"authors\":\"Prasenjit Thakur\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10509-024-04277-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, the emergent universe model (EU) is explored (as per Mukherjee <span>\\\\({\\\\mathit{et\\\\;al.}}\\\\)</span>) in a flat scenario with equation of state <span>\\\\((EoS)\\\\)</span> <span>\\\\(p=B\\\\rho -A\\\\rho ^{\\\\frac{1}{2}}\\\\)</span> (where <span>\\\\(A\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(B\\\\)</span> are constants). Here, the temperature function is evaluated in terms of the EoS parameters and redshift under the conditions of balanced particle creation and annihilation. To examine the thermodynamic evolution and find a viable EU model, constraints on its EoS parameters are determined. First, constraints on <span>\\\\(A_{s}\\\\)</span>, and <span>\\\\(B\\\\)</span> (where <span>\\\\(A_{s} = \\\\frac{A}{\\\\rho _{eu0}^{\\\\frac{1}{2}}}\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(\\\\rho _{eu0}\\\\)</span> is the present energy density) are obtained from the acceptable transition redshift limit <span>\\\\(z_{tr}\\\\)</span> and decoupling temperature limit <span>\\\\(T_{d}\\\\)</span> as <span>\\\\(A_{s}\\\\)</span> ≈ <span>\\\\((0.84-1.07)\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(B\\\\)</span> ≈ <span>\\\\((0.38-0.42)\\\\)</span> for the general EU model. Finally, stricter constraints on <span>\\\\(z_{tr}\\\\)</span> are drawn from recent <span>\\\\(T(z)-z\\\\)</span> and observed Hubble data (OHD). These <span>\\\\(z_{tr}\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(T_{d}\\\\)</span> values are then utilized to obtain acceptable limits on <span>\\\\(A_{s}\\\\)</span>, and <span>\\\\(B\\\\)</span>. On average, the acceptable limits on <span>\\\\(z_{tr}\\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(A_{s}\\\\)</span>, and <span>\\\\(B\\\\)</span> are <span>\\\\(0.79\\\\pm 0.03\\\\)</span> (in the 1<span>\\\\(\\\\sigma \\\\)</span> error limit), ≈ <span>\\\\((1.11-1.15)\\\\)</span> and ≈ <span>\\\\((0.41-0.43)\\\\)</span>, respectively, for the general EU model. In the <span>\\\\(B=\\\\frac{1}{3}\\\\)</span> model, obtained value <span>\\\\(z_{tr}= 0.71\\\\pm 0.01\\\\)</span> (at the 1<span>\\\\(\\\\sigma \\\\)</span> level). The present values of the EoS parameters are determined, and the viability of the models is examined with plots of the deceleration parameter (<span>\\\\(q\\\\)</span>), equation of state (<span>\\\\(\\\\omega \\\\)</span>) and squared adiabatic sound speed (<span>\\\\(c^{2}_{s}\\\\)</span>) with redshift (<span>\\\\(z\\\\)</span>). The distance modulus (<span>\\\\(\\\\mu \\\\)</span>) of this EU model is compared with the HIIG and Union2.1 data. The models with <span>\\\\(B\\\\)</span> <span>\\\\((= -\\\\frac{1}{3}, 0)\\\\)</span>, are not suitable at all according to the present analysis, whereas, the <span>\\\\(B=\\\\frac{1}{3}\\\\)</span> model is quite similar to the observations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astrophysics and Space Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astrophysics and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-024-04277-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-024-04277-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本文中,我们探讨了在平面场景下的新兴宇宙模型(EU)(根据 Mukherjee ({\mathit{et\;al.}\)),该模型的状态方程为\p=B\rho -A\rho ^{\frac{1}{2}}(其中 \(A\)和 \(B\)是常数)。在这里,温度函数是在粒子产生和湮灭平衡的条件下,根据 EoS 参数和红移进行评估的。为了研究热力学演化并找到一个可行的 EU 模型,需要确定其 EoS 参数的约束条件。首先,对 \(A_{s}\)、和 B 的约束(其中 \(A_{s} = \frac{A}{rho _{eu0}^{\frac{1}{2}}}\) 和 \(\rho _{eu0}\) 是当前的能量密度)。可接受的转变红移极限(z_{tr})和解耦温度极限(T_{d})为 \(A_{s}\) ≈\((0.84-1.07)和(B)≈((0.38-0.42))。最后,对\(z_{tr}\)更严格的约束来自最近的\(T(z)-z\)和观测到的哈勃数据(OHD)。然后利用这些(z_{tr})和(T_{d})值来获得(A_{s})和(B)的可接受限值。平均而言,对于一般的欧盟模型,z_{tr}\、\(A_{s}\)和\(B\)的可接受限值分别是\(0.79\pm 0.03\) (在 1 (σ)误差限值内)、≈\((1.11-1.15)\)和≈\((0.41-0.43)\)。在(B=frac{1}{3})模型中,得到的值(z_{tr}= 0.71\pm 0.01)(在1(\sigma \)水平上)。确定了EoS参数的现值,并用减速参数(q)、状态方程(\(\omega \))和绝热声速平方(\(c^{2}_{s}\))与红移(\(z\))的关系图检验了模型的可行性。这个欧盟模型的距离模量(\(\mu \))与HIIG和Union2.1的数据进行了比较。根据目前的分析,(B)((=-\frac{1}{3},0)\)的模型完全不合适,而(B=\frac{1}{3}\)的模型与观测结果非常相似。
Constraints on the emergent universe from recent temperature and Hubble data
In this paper, the emergent universe model (EU) is explored (as per Mukherjee \({\mathit{et\;al.}}\)) in a flat scenario with equation of state \((EoS)\)\(p=B\rho -A\rho ^{\frac{1}{2}}\) (where \(A\) and \(B\) are constants). Here, the temperature function is evaluated in terms of the EoS parameters and redshift under the conditions of balanced particle creation and annihilation. To examine the thermodynamic evolution and find a viable EU model, constraints on its EoS parameters are determined. First, constraints on \(A_{s}\), and \(B\) (where \(A_{s} = \frac{A}{\rho _{eu0}^{\frac{1}{2}}}\) and \(\rho _{eu0}\) is the present energy density) are obtained from the acceptable transition redshift limit \(z_{tr}\) and decoupling temperature limit \(T_{d}\) as \(A_{s}\) ≈ \((0.84-1.07)\) and \(B\) ≈ \((0.38-0.42)\) for the general EU model. Finally, stricter constraints on \(z_{tr}\) are drawn from recent \(T(z)-z\) and observed Hubble data (OHD). These \(z_{tr}\) and \(T_{d}\) values are then utilized to obtain acceptable limits on \(A_{s}\), and \(B\). On average, the acceptable limits on \(z_{tr}\), \(A_{s}\), and \(B\) are \(0.79\pm 0.03\) (in the 1\(\sigma \) error limit), ≈ \((1.11-1.15)\) and ≈ \((0.41-0.43)\), respectively, for the general EU model. In the \(B=\frac{1}{3}\) model, obtained value \(z_{tr}= 0.71\pm 0.01\) (at the 1\(\sigma \) level). The present values of the EoS parameters are determined, and the viability of the models is examined with plots of the deceleration parameter (\(q\)), equation of state (\(\omega \)) and squared adiabatic sound speed (\(c^{2}_{s}\)) with redshift (\(z\)). The distance modulus (\(\mu \)) of this EU model is compared with the HIIG and Union2.1 data. The models with \(B\)\((= -\frac{1}{3}, 0)\), are not suitable at all according to the present analysis, whereas, the \(B=\frac{1}{3}\) model is quite similar to the observations.
期刊介绍:
Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered.
The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing.
Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.