更好的伤口护理始于更好的证据:伤口护理证据峰会成果》(Wound Care Evidence Summit™)。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Advances in wound care Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1089/wound.2024.0022
Marissa J Carter, Marcia Nusgart, Winifred Hayes
{"title":"更好的伤口护理始于更好的证据:伤口护理证据峰会成果》(Wound Care Evidence Summit™)。","authors":"Marissa J Carter, Marcia Nusgart, Winifred Hayes","doi":"10.1089/wound.2024.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2022, the Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders convened the 2-day Wound Care Evidence Summit™. The Summit brought together a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders that included payers, government agency policymakers, prominent researchers, wound care medical specialty societies, patient and clinical associations, wound care clinics, and manufacturers to discuss wound care evidence and coverage issues. The Summit focused on a wide variety of wound care topics, with an emphasis on the processes payers use to create their coverage policies and the type, quantity, and characteristics of clinical evidence payers require. The most valuable outcome of the Summit was the frank and open discourse among stakeholders, with unprecedented participation from payers and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the subjects of trial design, product-approval pathways, and coverage policy determination. Stakeholders provided actionable ideas for ways to improve clinical trial research and design that will yield better evidence and ultimately better wound care. This article examines the quality, adequacy, and relevance of the existing chronic wound care research base and discusses the gaps, associated problems, and implications for clinical trial design and execution as identified by Summit participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"329-335"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better Wound Care Begins With Better Evidence: Outcomes of the Wound Care Evidence Summit.\",\"authors\":\"Marissa J Carter, Marcia Nusgart, Winifred Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/wound.2024.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2022, the Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders convened the 2-day Wound Care Evidence Summit™. The Summit brought together a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders that included payers, government agency policymakers, prominent researchers, wound care medical specialty societies, patient and clinical associations, wound care clinics, and manufacturers to discuss wound care evidence and coverage issues. The Summit focused on a wide variety of wound care topics, with an emphasis on the processes payers use to create their coverage policies and the type, quantity, and characteristics of clinical evidence payers require. The most valuable outcome of the Summit was the frank and open discourse among stakeholders, with unprecedented participation from payers and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the subjects of trial design, product-approval pathways, and coverage policy determination. Stakeholders provided actionable ideas for ways to improve clinical trial research and design that will yield better evidence and ultimately better wound care. This article examines the quality, adequacy, and relevance of the existing chronic wound care research base and discusses the gaps, associated problems, and implications for clinical trial design and execution as identified by Summit participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"329-335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2024.0022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2024.0022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年,伤口护理利益相关者联盟召开了为期两天的伤口护理证据峰会 (Wound Care Evidence Summit™)。此次峰会汇集了多学科的利益相关者,包括支付方、政府机构政策制定者、著名研究人员、伤口护理医学专业协会、患者和临床协会、伤口护理诊所和制造商,共同讨论伤口护理证据和覆盖问题。此次峰会集中讨论了各种伤口护理主题,重点是支付方制定承保政策的流程以及支付方所需的临床证据的类型、数量和特征。此次峰会最有价值的成果是利益相关者之间坦诚而开放的讨论,支付方和 FDA 就试验设计、产品审批途径和承保政策确定等主题进行了前所未有的参与。利益相关者就如何改进临床试验研究和设计提出了可行的意见,这些意见将产生更好的证据,并最终改善伤口护理。本文探讨了现有慢性伤口护理研究基础的质量、充分性和相关性,并讨论了峰会与会者发现的差距、相关问题以及对临床试验设计和执行的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Better Wound Care Begins With Better Evidence: Outcomes of the Wound Care Evidence Summit.

In 2022, the Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders convened the 2-day Wound Care Evidence Summit™. The Summit brought together a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders that included payers, government agency policymakers, prominent researchers, wound care medical specialty societies, patient and clinical associations, wound care clinics, and manufacturers to discuss wound care evidence and coverage issues. The Summit focused on a wide variety of wound care topics, with an emphasis on the processes payers use to create their coverage policies and the type, quantity, and characteristics of clinical evidence payers require. The most valuable outcome of the Summit was the frank and open discourse among stakeholders, with unprecedented participation from payers and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the subjects of trial design, product-approval pathways, and coverage policy determination. Stakeholders provided actionable ideas for ways to improve clinical trial research and design that will yield better evidence and ultimately better wound care. This article examines the quality, adequacy, and relevance of the existing chronic wound care research base and discusses the gaps, associated problems, and implications for clinical trial design and execution as identified by Summit participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
期刊最新文献
Alginate Formulation for Wound Healing Applications. Local Treatment of Wound Infections: A Review of Clinical Trials from 2013 to 2024. A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Complex Wounds: Influential Clinical Variables on Wound Healing Outcomes. Prediction of Healing Trajectory of Chronic Wounds Using a Machine Learning Approach. Topical Reconstituted High-Density Lipoproteins Elicit Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Diabetic Wounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1