粘液性卵巢癌:澳大利亚和新西兰的实践调查。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1111/ajo.13792
Niveditha Rajadevan, Ariane Flinkier, Hugo Saunders, Yeh Chen Lee, Clare Scott, Pearly Khaw, Prue Allan, Claire Davies, John Andrews, Michelle Wilson, Janine M Lombard, Michelle Harrison, Heshani Nesfield, Anna DeFazio, Tarek Meniawy, Kylie L Gorringe
{"title":"粘液性卵巢癌:澳大利亚和新西兰的实践调查。","authors":"Niveditha Rajadevan,&nbsp;Ariane Flinkier,&nbsp;Hugo Saunders,&nbsp;Yeh Chen Lee,&nbsp;Clare Scott,&nbsp;Pearly Khaw,&nbsp;Prue Allan,&nbsp;Claire Davies,&nbsp;John Andrews,&nbsp;Michelle Wilson,&nbsp;Janine M Lombard,&nbsp;Michelle Harrison,&nbsp;Heshani Nesfield,&nbsp;Anna DeFazio,&nbsp;Tarek Meniawy,&nbsp;Kylie L Gorringe","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare ovarian cancer with limited evidence to support clinical care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>We undertook a clinician survey to better understand current practice in treating MOC in Australia and New Zealand, and to determine any features associated with variation in care. In addition, we aimed to understand future research priorities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A RedCap survey was distributed to clinician members of the Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG). Questions included respondent demographics, three case studies and future research priorities. Clinicians were asked questions specific to their speciality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Respondents (<i>n</i> = 47) were commonly experienced gynae-oncology specialists, most often surgical (38%) or medical (30%) oncologists. There was good consensus for surgical approaches for stage I disease; however, variation in practice was noted for advanced or recurrent MOC. Variation was also observed for medical oncologists; in early-stage disease there was no clear consensus on whether to offer chemotherapy, or which regimen to recommend. For advanced and recurrent disease a wide range of chemotherapy options was considered, with a trend away from an ovarian-type toward gastrointestinal (GI)-type regimens in advanced MOC. This practice was reflected in future research priorities, with ‘Is a GI chemotherapy regimen better than an ovarian regimen?’ the most highly ranked option, followed by ‘Should stage 1C patients receive chemotherapy?’</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although the number of respondents limited the analyses, it was clear that chemotherapy selection was a key point of divergence for medical oncologists. Future research is needed to establish well-evidenced guidelines for clinical care of MOC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajo.13792","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mucinous ovarian carcinoma: A survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Niveditha Rajadevan,&nbsp;Ariane Flinkier,&nbsp;Hugo Saunders,&nbsp;Yeh Chen Lee,&nbsp;Clare Scott,&nbsp;Pearly Khaw,&nbsp;Prue Allan,&nbsp;Claire Davies,&nbsp;John Andrews,&nbsp;Michelle Wilson,&nbsp;Janine M Lombard,&nbsp;Michelle Harrison,&nbsp;Heshani Nesfield,&nbsp;Anna DeFazio,&nbsp;Tarek Meniawy,&nbsp;Kylie L Gorringe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare ovarian cancer with limited evidence to support clinical care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>We undertook a clinician survey to better understand current practice in treating MOC in Australia and New Zealand, and to determine any features associated with variation in care. In addition, we aimed to understand future research priorities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A RedCap survey was distributed to clinician members of the Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG). Questions included respondent demographics, three case studies and future research priorities. Clinicians were asked questions specific to their speciality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Respondents (<i>n</i> = 47) were commonly experienced gynae-oncology specialists, most often surgical (38%) or medical (30%) oncologists. There was good consensus for surgical approaches for stage I disease; however, variation in practice was noted for advanced or recurrent MOC. Variation was also observed for medical oncologists; in early-stage disease there was no clear consensus on whether to offer chemotherapy, or which regimen to recommend. For advanced and recurrent disease a wide range of chemotherapy options was considered, with a trend away from an ovarian-type toward gastrointestinal (GI)-type regimens in advanced MOC. This practice was reflected in future research priorities, with ‘Is a GI chemotherapy regimen better than an ovarian regimen?’ the most highly ranked option, followed by ‘Should stage 1C patients receive chemotherapy?’</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although the number of respondents limited the analyses, it was clear that chemotherapy selection was a key point of divergence for medical oncologists. Future research is needed to establish well-evidenced guidelines for clinical care of MOC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajo.13792\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajo.13792\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajo.13792","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:粘液性卵巢癌(MOC)是一种罕见的卵巢癌,支持临床治疗的证据有限。目的:我们开展了一项临床医生调查,以更好地了解澳大利亚和新西兰目前治疗粘液性卵巢癌的做法,并确定与治疗差异相关的任何特征。此外,我们还旨在了解未来的研究重点:我们向澳大利亚-新西兰妇科肿瘤组织(ANZGOG)的临床医生成员发放了一份RedCap调查问卷。问题包括受访者的人口统计学特征、三项病例研究和未来研究重点。临床医生被问及与其专业相关的问题:受访者(n = 47)通常都是经验丰富的妇科肿瘤专家,最常见的是外科肿瘤专家(38%)或内科肿瘤专家(30%)。对于 I 期疾病的手术方法已达成良好共识;但对于晚期或复发性 MOC,实践中存在差异。内科肿瘤学家的做法也不尽相同;对于早期疾病,是否提供化疗或推荐哪种化疗方案没有明确的共识。对于晚期和复发性疾病,则考虑了多种化疗方案,在晚期 MOC 中,化疗方案有从卵巢型向胃肠道(GI)型转变的趋势。这种做法反映在未来的研究重点中,"胃肠道化疗方案比卵巢化疗方案更好吗?"是排名最高的选项,其次是 "1C 期患者是否应该接受化疗?尽管受访者人数限制了分析结果,但化疗选择显然是肿瘤内科医生分歧的关键点。未来的研究需要为 MOC 的临床治疗制定有据可依的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mucinous ovarian carcinoma: A survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand

Background

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare ovarian cancer with limited evidence to support clinical care.

Aims

We undertook a clinician survey to better understand current practice in treating MOC in Australia and New Zealand, and to determine any features associated with variation in care. In addition, we aimed to understand future research priorities.

Methods

A RedCap survey was distributed to clinician members of the Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG). Questions included respondent demographics, three case studies and future research priorities. Clinicians were asked questions specific to their speciality.

Results

Respondents (n = 47) were commonly experienced gynae-oncology specialists, most often surgical (38%) or medical (30%) oncologists. There was good consensus for surgical approaches for stage I disease; however, variation in practice was noted for advanced or recurrent MOC. Variation was also observed for medical oncologists; in early-stage disease there was no clear consensus on whether to offer chemotherapy, or which regimen to recommend. For advanced and recurrent disease a wide range of chemotherapy options was considered, with a trend away from an ovarian-type toward gastrointestinal (GI)-type regimens in advanced MOC. This practice was reflected in future research priorities, with ‘Is a GI chemotherapy regimen better than an ovarian regimen?’ the most highly ranked option, followed by ‘Should stage 1C patients receive chemotherapy?’

Conclusions

Although the number of respondents limited the analyses, it was clear that chemotherapy selection was a key point of divergence for medical oncologists. Future research is needed to establish well-evidenced guidelines for clinical care of MOC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
期刊最新文献
Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey. What good emotional care for miscarriage looks like: A mixed-methods investigation in an Australian private hospital setting. Gender representation in obstetrics and gynaecology leadership. 'It's not a solution to keep telling me to lose weight!' Exploring endometrial cancer survivors' experiences of nutrition and well-being advice: A qualitative study. Vaginoscopy to investigate vaginal bleeding and discharge in prepubertal girls.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1