生成式人工智能聊天机器人的欺诈行为:欺骗与疏忽之间的一线之隔

IF 3.3 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Computer Law & Security Review Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105941
Maarten Herbosch
{"title":"生成式人工智能聊天机器人的欺诈行为:欺骗与疏忽之间的一线之隔","authors":"Maarten Herbosch","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The use of generative AI systems is on the rise. As a result, we are increasingly often conversing with AI </span>chatbots<span> rather than with fellow humans. This increasing use of AI systems leads to legal challenges as well, particularly when the chatbot provides incorrect information. In this article, we study whether someone who decides to contract on the basis of incorrect information provided by a generative AI chatbot might invoke the fraud regime to annul the resulting contract in various legal systems. During this analysis, it becomes clear that some of the requirements that are currently being put forward from a public law perspective, such as in the European AI Act, may also naturally arise from existing private law figures. In the same vein, this analysis highlights the interesting intradisciplinary feedback between instruments of public law and other legal domains.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fraud by generative AI chatbots: On the thin line between deception and negligence\",\"authors\":\"Maarten Herbosch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The use of generative AI systems is on the rise. As a result, we are increasingly often conversing with AI </span>chatbots<span> rather than with fellow humans. This increasing use of AI systems leads to legal challenges as well, particularly when the chatbot provides incorrect information. In this article, we study whether someone who decides to contract on the basis of incorrect information provided by a generative AI chatbot might invoke the fraud regime to annul the resulting contract in various legal systems. During this analysis, it becomes clear that some of the requirements that are currently being put forward from a public law perspective, such as in the European AI Act, may also naturally arise from existing private law figures. In the same vein, this analysis highlights the interesting intradisciplinary feedback between instruments of public law and other legal domains.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000086\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能系统的使用呈上升趋势。因此,我们越来越多地与人工智能聊天机器人对话,而不是与人类对话。人工智能系统的使用日益增多也带来了法律挑战,尤其是当聊天机器人提供错误信息时。在本文中,我们将研究在不同的法律体系中,根据生成式人工智能聊天机器人提供的错误信息决定签约的人是否会援引欺诈制度来废除由此产生的合同。在分析过程中,我们可以清楚地看到,目前从公法角度提出的一些要求,如《欧洲人工智能法》中的要求,也可能自然而然地产生于现有的私法数据中。同样,本分析强调了公法文书与其他法律领域之间有趣的学科内反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fraud by generative AI chatbots: On the thin line between deception and negligence

The use of generative AI systems is on the rise. As a result, we are increasingly often conversing with AI chatbots rather than with fellow humans. This increasing use of AI systems leads to legal challenges as well, particularly when the chatbot provides incorrect information. In this article, we study whether someone who decides to contract on the basis of incorrect information provided by a generative AI chatbot might invoke the fraud regime to annul the resulting contract in various legal systems. During this analysis, it becomes clear that some of the requirements that are currently being put forward from a public law perspective, such as in the European AI Act, may also naturally arise from existing private law figures. In the same vein, this analysis highlights the interesting intradisciplinary feedback between instruments of public law and other legal domains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
期刊最新文献
Procedural fairness in automated asylum procedures: Fundamental rights for fundamental challenges Asia-Pacific developments An Infrastructural Brussels Effect: The translation of EU Law into the UK's digital borders Mapping interpretations of the law in online content moderation in Germany A European right to end-to-end encryption?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1