俯卧位治疗重度阿尔茨海默病期间的心肺动力学:一项回顾性队列研究

Andrew Barros, Seung Wook Lee, J Randall Moorman
{"title":"俯卧位治疗重度阿尔茨海默病期间的心肺动力学:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Andrew Barros, Seung Wook Lee, J Randall Moorman","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.30.24301935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\nTo elucidate the changes in cardiorespiratory dynamics during neuromuscular blockade and prone positioning and determine the associations between changes in cardiorespiratory dynamics following prone positioning and mortality.\nDesign\nSingle center retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical ICU between June 1, 2020 and September 1, 2022 who received prone positioning while mechanically ventilated.\nResults\nOur final cohort consisted of 136 patients. Prone position was associated with an improvement in A-a gradient of 113 mmHg (95% CrI 78 - 149) between the pre-proning values and 10 hours post proning. Norepinephrine dose did not significantly change before and after prone positioning (Estimated difference: 0.04 mcg/min 95% CrI -1.00 - 1.07). For the outcome of 7-d mortality, there was a high probability that the baseline factors of increasing age, male sex, and higher baseline A-a gradient were associated with increased risk of death. Increased total vasopressor requirement and increased in PCO2 were associated with worse prognosis while a decrease in instantaneous heart rate and a decrease in heart rate variability were associated with improved prognosis. Conclusion\nThe immediate changes in prone positioning primarily impact respiratory physiology, with limited influence on circulatory parameters. Predictors of short-term mortality after prone positioning include both respiratory and cardiovascular parameters suggesting that extrapulmonary effects, such as improvement in right ventricular heart function, might also contribute to the benefit of prone positioning.","PeriodicalId":501074,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CARDIORESPIRATORY DYNAMICS DURING PRONE POSITIONING FOR SEVERE ARDS: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Barros, Seung Wook Lee, J Randall Moorman\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.01.30.24301935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives\\nTo elucidate the changes in cardiorespiratory dynamics during neuromuscular blockade and prone positioning and determine the associations between changes in cardiorespiratory dynamics following prone positioning and mortality.\\nDesign\\nSingle center retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical ICU between June 1, 2020 and September 1, 2022 who received prone positioning while mechanically ventilated.\\nResults\\nOur final cohort consisted of 136 patients. Prone position was associated with an improvement in A-a gradient of 113 mmHg (95% CrI 78 - 149) between the pre-proning values and 10 hours post proning. Norepinephrine dose did not significantly change before and after prone positioning (Estimated difference: 0.04 mcg/min 95% CrI -1.00 - 1.07). For the outcome of 7-d mortality, there was a high probability that the baseline factors of increasing age, male sex, and higher baseline A-a gradient were associated with increased risk of death. Increased total vasopressor requirement and increased in PCO2 were associated with worse prognosis while a decrease in instantaneous heart rate and a decrease in heart rate variability were associated with improved prognosis. Conclusion\\nThe immediate changes in prone positioning primarily impact respiratory physiology, with limited influence on circulatory parameters. Predictors of short-term mortality after prone positioning include both respiratory and cardiovascular parameters suggesting that extrapulmonary effects, such as improvement in right ventricular heart function, might also contribute to the benefit of prone positioning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.30.24301935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.30.24301935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的阐明神经肌肉阻滞和俯卧位过程中心肺动力学的变化,并确定俯卧位后心肺动力学变化与死亡率之间的关联.设计对 2020 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 1 日期间入住内科重症监护室、在机械通气时接受俯卧位的患者进行单中心回顾性队列研究.结果我们的最终队列由 136 名患者组成。俯卧位与A-a梯度的改善有关,俯卧位前与俯卧位后10小时的A-a梯度值相差113 mmHg(95% CrI 78 - 149)。俯卧位前后去甲肾上腺素剂量无明显变化(估计差异:0.04 mcg/min 95% CrI -1.00 - 1.07)。就 7 天死亡率结果而言,年龄增加、男性和较高的基线 A-a 梯度等基线因素极有可能与死亡风险增加有关。血管加压剂总需求增加和 PCO2 升高与预后恶化有关,而瞬时心率降低和心率变异性降低与预后改善有关。结论 俯卧位的即时变化主要影响呼吸生理,对循环参数的影响有限。俯卧位后短期死亡率的预测因素包括呼吸和心血管参数,这表明肺外效应,如右心室心脏功能的改善,也可能有助于俯卧位的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CARDIORESPIRATORY DYNAMICS DURING PRONE POSITIONING FOR SEVERE ARDS: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
Objectives To elucidate the changes in cardiorespiratory dynamics during neuromuscular blockade and prone positioning and determine the associations between changes in cardiorespiratory dynamics following prone positioning and mortality. Design Single center retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical ICU between June 1, 2020 and September 1, 2022 who received prone positioning while mechanically ventilated. Results Our final cohort consisted of 136 patients. Prone position was associated with an improvement in A-a gradient of 113 mmHg (95% CrI 78 - 149) between the pre-proning values and 10 hours post proning. Norepinephrine dose did not significantly change before and after prone positioning (Estimated difference: 0.04 mcg/min 95% CrI -1.00 - 1.07). For the outcome of 7-d mortality, there was a high probability that the baseline factors of increasing age, male sex, and higher baseline A-a gradient were associated with increased risk of death. Increased total vasopressor requirement and increased in PCO2 were associated with worse prognosis while a decrease in instantaneous heart rate and a decrease in heart rate variability were associated with improved prognosis. Conclusion The immediate changes in prone positioning primarily impact respiratory physiology, with limited influence on circulatory parameters. Predictors of short-term mortality after prone positioning include both respiratory and cardiovascular parameters suggesting that extrapulmonary effects, such as improvement in right ventricular heart function, might also contribute to the benefit of prone positioning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building and validating a predictive model for stroke risk in Chinese community-dwelling patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using machine learning methods CORELSA - Remote stethoscope system for fast and standardized auscultations of large numbers of patients with respiratory syndromes The post-viral GPNMB+ immune niche persists in long-term Covid, asthma, and COPD Lung functions among children and adolescents with sickle cell disease receiving care at Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital Kisumu, Kenya BMI-related Genetic Factors and COPD Imaging Phenotypes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1