英国内镜培训师调查:对当前内镜培训的实施、经验、障碍和机遇的看法

IF 2.4 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Frontline Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1136/flgastro-2023-102557
Fraser Brown, Alice Weidner, Christopher Wells, Rumneet Ghumman, Susan McConnell, Wee Sing Ngu, Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Sharmila Subramaniam, Jamie Barbour
{"title":"英国内镜培训师调查:对当前内镜培训的实施、经验、障碍和机遇的看法","authors":"Fraser Brown, Alice Weidner, Christopher Wells, Rumneet Ghumman, Susan McConnell, Wee Sing Ngu, Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Sharmila Subramaniam, Jamie Barbour","doi":"10.1136/flgastro-2023-102557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective UK endoscopy training is delivered by trainers possessing well developed endoscopy and teaching skills to help learners perform high-quality endoscopy. Train The Trainer (TTT) courses are effective, but additional trainer support is variable with little formal quality assurance. We performed a survey to map UK endoscopy training, assess trainer perspectives on training delivery and identify factors that would enhance training. Design/Method An online survey was designed by trainer representatives, in collaboration with the JAG training committee, and collected responses from trainers registered on JAG endoscopy training system e-portfolio from April to June 2022. Results There were 1024 responses from all trainer disciplines, with 813 (79%) completing TTT courses and 584 (57%) having job planned dedicated training lists (DTLs). Clinical endoscopists most frequently had job-planned DTLs (71%), and DTLs occurring at least weekly (58%). 293 (29%) respondents participated as course faculty. Trainers reported high levels of pre-procedure preparation, effective dialogue and frequent feedback. The DOPS forms were ‘always/often’ completed by 81% of clinical endoscopists, 73% of gastroenterologist and 58% of surgeons. 435 (42%) trainers never had peer feedback. Responses suggested training could improve by protecting training time, attending courses, participating as faculty and receiving feedback from experienced trainers. Conclusion This survey demonstrates substantial proportions of highly motivated UK trainers who value time spent teaching and learning how to teach. Skills taught on the TTT courses are often actively used in everyday training. Improved trainer course access, protected training time and formal use of existing feedback tools by peers were highlighted as measures that could support trainers’ development. Data are available upon reasonable request. The anonymous dataset generated from the survey can be made available on reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":46937,"journal":{"name":"Frontline Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UK endoscopy trainer survey: perspectives on current endoscopy training delivery, experience, barriers and opportunities\",\"authors\":\"Fraser Brown, Alice Weidner, Christopher Wells, Rumneet Ghumman, Susan McConnell, Wee Sing Ngu, Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Sharmila Subramaniam, Jamie Barbour\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/flgastro-2023-102557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective UK endoscopy training is delivered by trainers possessing well developed endoscopy and teaching skills to help learners perform high-quality endoscopy. Train The Trainer (TTT) courses are effective, but additional trainer support is variable with little formal quality assurance. We performed a survey to map UK endoscopy training, assess trainer perspectives on training delivery and identify factors that would enhance training. Design/Method An online survey was designed by trainer representatives, in collaboration with the JAG training committee, and collected responses from trainers registered on JAG endoscopy training system e-portfolio from April to June 2022. Results There were 1024 responses from all trainer disciplines, with 813 (79%) completing TTT courses and 584 (57%) having job planned dedicated training lists (DTLs). Clinical endoscopists most frequently had job-planned DTLs (71%), and DTLs occurring at least weekly (58%). 293 (29%) respondents participated as course faculty. Trainers reported high levels of pre-procedure preparation, effective dialogue and frequent feedback. The DOPS forms were ‘always/often’ completed by 81% of clinical endoscopists, 73% of gastroenterologist and 58% of surgeons. 435 (42%) trainers never had peer feedback. Responses suggested training could improve by protecting training time, attending courses, participating as faculty and receiving feedback from experienced trainers. Conclusion This survey demonstrates substantial proportions of highly motivated UK trainers who value time spent teaching and learning how to teach. Skills taught on the TTT courses are often actively used in everyday training. Improved trainer course access, protected training time and formal use of existing feedback tools by peers were highlighted as measures that could support trainers’ development. Data are available upon reasonable request. The anonymous dataset generated from the survey can be made available on reasonable request.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontline Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontline Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2023-102557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontline Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2023-102557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国内镜培训的目标是由具备完善的内镜和教学技能的培训师提供培训,帮助学员进行高质量的内镜检查。培训师培训(TTT)课程很有效,但额外的培训师支持却不尽相同,几乎没有正式的质量保证。我们进行了一项调查,以绘制英国内窥镜培训地图,评估培训师对培训实施的看法,并确定可加强培训的因素。设计/方法 培训师代表与 JAG 培训委员会合作设计了一项在线调查,并在 2022 年 4 月至 6 月期间收集了在 JAG 内窥镜培训系统电子档案中注册的培训师的回复。结果 所有培训师学科共收到1024份回复,其中813人(79%)完成了TTT课程,584人(57%)拥有工作计划中的专门培训清单(DTL)。临床内镜医师最常在工作计划中安排 DTL(71%),至少每周安排一次 DTL(58%)。293名受访者(29%)担任了课程教员。培训人员报告说,他们在术前准备、有效对话和频繁反馈方面都达到了很高的水平。81%的临床内镜医师、73%的消化内科医生和58%的外科医生 "总是/经常 "填写 DOPS 表格。435名(42%)培训人员从未获得过同行反馈。调查结果表明,可以通过保护培训时间、参加课程、担任教员以及从经验丰富的培训师那里获得反馈来改善培训工作。结论 本次调查显示,英国有相当一部分积极性很高的培训师重视教学时间和学习如何教学。TTT 课程所教授的技能通常会在日常培训中得到积极运用。改善培训师的课程学习机会、保护培训时间以及同行正式使用现有的反馈工具,这些都是可以支持培训师发展的措施。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。调查所产生的匿名数据集可应合理要求提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UK endoscopy trainer survey: perspectives on current endoscopy training delivery, experience, barriers and opportunities
Objective UK endoscopy training is delivered by trainers possessing well developed endoscopy and teaching skills to help learners perform high-quality endoscopy. Train The Trainer (TTT) courses are effective, but additional trainer support is variable with little formal quality assurance. We performed a survey to map UK endoscopy training, assess trainer perspectives on training delivery and identify factors that would enhance training. Design/Method An online survey was designed by trainer representatives, in collaboration with the JAG training committee, and collected responses from trainers registered on JAG endoscopy training system e-portfolio from April to June 2022. Results There were 1024 responses from all trainer disciplines, with 813 (79%) completing TTT courses and 584 (57%) having job planned dedicated training lists (DTLs). Clinical endoscopists most frequently had job-planned DTLs (71%), and DTLs occurring at least weekly (58%). 293 (29%) respondents participated as course faculty. Trainers reported high levels of pre-procedure preparation, effective dialogue and frequent feedback. The DOPS forms were ‘always/often’ completed by 81% of clinical endoscopists, 73% of gastroenterologist and 58% of surgeons. 435 (42%) trainers never had peer feedback. Responses suggested training could improve by protecting training time, attending courses, participating as faculty and receiving feedback from experienced trainers. Conclusion This survey demonstrates substantial proportions of highly motivated UK trainers who value time spent teaching and learning how to teach. Skills taught on the TTT courses are often actively used in everyday training. Improved trainer course access, protected training time and formal use of existing feedback tools by peers were highlighted as measures that could support trainers’ development. Data are available upon reasonable request. The anonymous dataset generated from the survey can be made available on reasonable request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontline Gastroenterology
Frontline Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles that accelerate adoption of innovative and best practice in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. Frontline Gastroenterology is especially interested in articles on multidisciplinary research and care, focusing on both retrospective assessments of novel models of care as well as putative future directions of best practice. Specifically Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles in the domains of clinical quality, patient experience, service provision and medical education.
期刊最新文献
British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Quality Improvement Programme: minimum service standards and good practice statements Investigation of abnormal liver blood tests in patients with inflammatory bowel disease Effectiveness of risankizumab induction and maintenance therapy for refractory Crohn’s disease: a real-world experience from a preapproval access programme and early access to medicines scheme #FGDebate: addressing regional variations in care and outcomes for patients with liver disease Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of chronic liver disease risk factors and liver fibrosis in a remotely living Indigenous Australian population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1