Zhen-yu Ma , Shu-ping Yang , Ying Li , Tian-tian Xu , Ya-lin Yang , Hui-yong Yang , Heng-bing Li , Le-jin Zhou , Yong Diao , Su-yun Li
{"title":"使用红麴制剂与不良健康后果之间的关系:随机对照试验荟萃分析综述","authors":"Zhen-yu Ma , Shu-ping Yang , Ying Li , Tian-tian Xu , Ya-lin Yang , Hui-yong Yang , Heng-bing Li , Le-jin Zhou , Yong Diao , Su-yun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.joim.2024.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Red yeast rice (RYR), a natural lipid-lowering agent, is widely used in clinical practice. However, the existing meta-analyses concerning the safety of RYR preparations have yielded inconsistent results, and the credibility of the evidence has not been quantified.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study was designed to evaluate the existing evidence and offer a comprehensive understanding of the associations between the use of RYR preparations and various adverse health outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Search strategy</h3><p>Seven literature databases were searched from inception to May 5, 2023, using medical subject headings and free-text terms (e.g., “red yeast rice,” “<em>Xuezhikang</em>,” and “<em>Zhibitai</em>”).</p></div><div><h3>Inclusion criteria</h3><p>Meta-analyses that investigated and quantitatively estimated associations between the use of RYR preparations and adverse health outcomes were included in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Data extraction and analysis</h3><p>Two researchers independently extracted data using a standardized data collection table; any disagreements were resolved by consulting a third researcher. Based on the participant, intervention, comparator and outcome (PICO) framework in each eligible meta-analysis, a series of unique associations between the use of RYR preparations and adverse health outcomes were determined. The associations’ effect estimates were re-evaluated using random-effect models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifteen meta-analyses, comprising 186 (164 unique) randomized controlled trials, were identified. Based on A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews version 2, 3 (20%) and 12 (80%) of these meta-analyses had low and critically low confidence, respectively. A total of 61 unique associations between the use of RYR preparations and adverse health outcomes were extracted from eligible meta-analyses. Based on the random-effect models, 10 (16.4%) associations indicated a significant protective effect of RYR preparations against adverse health outcomes, while 5 (8.2%) indicated an increased risk of adverse health outcomes related to uric acid, alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels. The other 46 (75.4%) associations showed no significant difference between the use of RYR preparations and control treatments. Regarding the credibility of the evidence, 21 (34.4%), 34 (55.7%) and 6 (9.8%) associations showed moderate, low and very low credibility, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The evidence examined in this study suggests that RYR preparations are safe; however, the credibility of the evidence was not high. Further high-quality evidence is required.</p><p>Please cite this article as: Ma ZY, Yang SP, Li Y, Xu TT, Yang YL, Yang HY, Li HB, Zhou LJ, Diao Y, Li SY. Associations between the use of red yeast rice preparations and adverse health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. <em>J Integr Med</em>. 2024; 22(2): 126–136.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 126-136"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between the use of red yeast rice preparations and adverse health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Zhen-yu Ma , Shu-ping Yang , Ying Li , Tian-tian Xu , Ya-lin Yang , Hui-yong Yang , Heng-bing Li , Le-jin Zhou , Yong Diao , Su-yun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joim.2024.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Red yeast rice (RYR), a natural lipid-lowering agent, is widely used in clinical practice. However, the existing meta-analyses concerning the safety of RYR preparations have yielded inconsistent results, and the credibility of the evidence has not been quantified.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study was designed to evaluate the existing evidence and offer a comprehensive understanding of the associations between the use of RYR preparations and various adverse health outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Search strategy</h3><p>Seven literature databases were searched from inception to May 5, 2023, using medical subject headings and free-text terms (e.g., “red yeast rice,” “<em>Xuezhikang</em>,” and “<em>Zhibitai</em>”).</p></div><div><h3>Inclusion criteria</h3><p>Meta-analyses that investigated and quantitatively estimated associations between the use of RYR preparations and adverse health outcomes were included in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Data extraction and analysis</h3><p>Two researchers independently extracted data using a standardized data collection table; any disagreements were resolved by consulting a third researcher. Based on the participant, intervention, comparator and outcome (PICO) framework in each eligible meta-analysis, a series of unique associations between the use of RYR preparations and adverse health outcomes were determined. The associations’ effect estimates were re-evaluated using random-effect models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifteen meta-analyses, comprising 186 (164 unique) randomized controlled trials, were identified. Based on A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews version 2, 3 (20%) and 12 (80%) of these meta-analyses had low and critically low confidence, respectively. A total of 61 unique associations between the use of RYR preparations and adverse health outcomes were extracted from eligible meta-analyses. Based on the random-effect models, 10 (16.4%) associations indicated a significant protective effect of RYR preparations against adverse health outcomes, while 5 (8.2%) indicated an increased risk of adverse health outcomes related to uric acid, alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels. The other 46 (75.4%) associations showed no significant difference between the use of RYR preparations and control treatments. Regarding the credibility of the evidence, 21 (34.4%), 34 (55.7%) and 6 (9.8%) associations showed moderate, low and very low credibility, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The evidence examined in this study suggests that RYR preparations are safe; however, the credibility of the evidence was not high. Further high-quality evidence is required.</p><p>Please cite this article as: Ma ZY, Yang SP, Li Y, Xu TT, Yang YL, Yang HY, Li HB, Zhou LJ, Diao Y, Li SY. Associations between the use of red yeast rice preparations and adverse health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. <em>J Integr Med</em>. 2024; 22(2): 126–136.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 126-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095496424000086\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095496424000086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景红曲米(RYR)是一种天然降血脂药物,被广泛应用于临床实践。本研究旨在评估现有证据,并全面了解使用红酵母米制剂与各种不良健康结果之间的关联。检索策略使用医学主题词和自由文本词(如 "红酵母米"、"雪芝康 "和 "知必泰")检索了七个文献数据库,检索期从开始到 2023 年 5 月 5 日、"纳入标准本研究纳入了调查和定量估计使用红曲制剂与不良健康后果之间相关性的元分析。数据提取和分析两名研究人员使用标准化数据收集表独立提取数据;任何分歧均通过咨询第三名研究人员来解决。根据每项符合条件的荟萃分析中的参与者、干预措施、比较者和结果(PICO)框架,确定了使用 RYR 制剂与不良健康结果之间的一系列独特关联。使用随机效应模型对这些关联的效应估计值进行了重新评估。结果确定了 15 项元分析,包括 186 项随机对照试验(164 项唯一试验)。根据系统综述评估工具(A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews)第 2 版,这些荟萃分析中分别有 3 项(20%)和 12 项(80%)置信度较低和极低。从符合条件的荟萃分析中,共提取了 61 项使用 RYR 制剂与不良健康结果之间的独特关联。根据随机效应模型,10 项(16.4%)关联表明 RYR 制剂对不良健康结果具有显著的保护作用,5 项(8.2%)关联表明与尿酸、丙氨酸转氨酶和天冬氨酸转氨酶水平有关的不良健康结果的风险增加。其他 46 项(75.4%)关联显示,使用 RYR 制剂与对照治疗之间没有显著差异。关于证据的可信度,21 项(34.4%)、34 项(55.7%)和 6 项(9.8%)分别显示出中等、低和极低的可信度。本文引用如前:Ma ZY, Yang SP, Li Y, Xu TT, Yang YL, Yang HY, Li HB, Zhou LJ, Diao Y, Li SY.使用红曲米制剂与不良健康后果之间的关系:随机对照试验荟萃分析综述》。J Integr Med.2023; Epub ahead of print.
Associations between the use of red yeast rice preparations and adverse health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
Background
Red yeast rice (RYR), a natural lipid-lowering agent, is widely used in clinical practice. However, the existing meta-analyses concerning the safety of RYR preparations have yielded inconsistent results, and the credibility of the evidence has not been quantified.
Objective
This study was designed to evaluate the existing evidence and offer a comprehensive understanding of the associations between the use of RYR preparations and various adverse health outcomes.
Search strategy
Seven literature databases were searched from inception to May 5, 2023, using medical subject headings and free-text terms (e.g., “red yeast rice,” “Xuezhikang,” and “Zhibitai”).
Inclusion criteria
Meta-analyses that investigated and quantitatively estimated associations between the use of RYR preparations and adverse health outcomes were included in this study.
Data extraction and analysis
Two researchers independently extracted data using a standardized data collection table; any disagreements were resolved by consulting a third researcher. Based on the participant, intervention, comparator and outcome (PICO) framework in each eligible meta-analysis, a series of unique associations between the use of RYR preparations and adverse health outcomes were determined. The associations’ effect estimates were re-evaluated using random-effect models.
Results
Fifteen meta-analyses, comprising 186 (164 unique) randomized controlled trials, were identified. Based on A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews version 2, 3 (20%) and 12 (80%) of these meta-analyses had low and critically low confidence, respectively. A total of 61 unique associations between the use of RYR preparations and adverse health outcomes were extracted from eligible meta-analyses. Based on the random-effect models, 10 (16.4%) associations indicated a significant protective effect of RYR preparations against adverse health outcomes, while 5 (8.2%) indicated an increased risk of adverse health outcomes related to uric acid, alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels. The other 46 (75.4%) associations showed no significant difference between the use of RYR preparations and control treatments. Regarding the credibility of the evidence, 21 (34.4%), 34 (55.7%) and 6 (9.8%) associations showed moderate, low and very low credibility, respectively.
Conclusion
The evidence examined in this study suggests that RYR preparations are safe; however, the credibility of the evidence was not high. Further high-quality evidence is required.
Please cite this article as: Ma ZY, Yang SP, Li Y, Xu TT, Yang YL, Yang HY, Li HB, Zhou LJ, Diao Y, Li SY. Associations between the use of red yeast rice preparations and adverse health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(2): 126–136.
期刊介绍:
The predecessor of JIM is the Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine (Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao). With this new, English-language publication, we are committed to make JIM an international platform for publishing high-quality papers on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and an open forum in which the different professions and international scholarly communities can exchange views, share research and their clinical experience, discuss CAM education, and confer about issues and problems in our various disciplines and in CAM as a whole in order to promote integrative medicine.
JIM is indexed/abstracted in: MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Embase, Chemical Abstracts (CA), CAB Abstracts, EBSCO, WPRIM, JST China, Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI).
JIM Editorial Office uses ThomsonReuters ScholarOne Manuscripts as submitting and review system (submission link: http://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/jcim-en).
JIM is published bimonthly. Manuscripts submitted to JIM should be written in English. Article types include but are not limited to randomized controlled and pragmatic trials, translational and patient-centered effectiveness outcome studies, case series and reports, clinical trial protocols, preclinical and basic science studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, papers on methodology and CAM history or education, conference proceedings, editorials, commentaries, short communications, book reviews, and letters to the editor.
Our purpose is to publish a prestigious international journal for studies in integrative medicine. To achieve this aim, we seek to publish high-quality papers on any aspects of integrative medicine, such as acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine, Ayurveda medicine, herbal medicine, homeopathy, nutrition, chiropractic, mind-body medicine, taichi, qigong, meditation, and any other modalities of CAM; our commitment to international scope ensures that research and progress from all regions of the world are widely covered. These ensure that articles published in JIM have the maximum exposure to the international scholarly community.
JIM can help its authors let their papers reach the widest possible range of readers, and let all those who share an interest in their research field be concerned with their study.