掌指关节阻滞矫形器与相对运动伸展矫形器治疗扳机指:随机临床试验

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2023.10.008
{"title":"掌指关节阻滞矫形器与相对运动伸展矫形器治疗扳机指:随机临床试验","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2023.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>The metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis (MCPJ-BO) is one of the first-line </span>orthotic treatment for patients with trigger finger (TF). Relative motion extension orthosis (RME-O) has recently emerged as a treatment option for various hand disorders involving TF.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 6 weeks of orthotic treatment with the MCPJ-BO and the RME-O for pain relief. Function and satisfaction with the orthosis were assessed as secondary objectives.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Randomized clinical study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty patients with an average age of 50 years with Froimson stage 1-3 A1 pulley triggering participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the MCPJ-BO (<em>n</em> = 15; 10 females, five males) or the RME-O group (<em>n</em><span><span> = 15; 12 females, three males). The orthoses were worn full time for 6 weeks. All patients received patient education, activity modification, and flexor tendon gliding exercises as part of the rehabilitation program. Pre- and post-assessments included </span>Numeric Pain Rating Scale<span>, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to analyze the difference between the two groups.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no significant differences between the two groups in pain and function before treatment (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Within-group comparisons indicated that both orthoses relieved pain, but the MCPJ-BO group achieved greater pain relief (<em>p</em> = 0.001). There was a significant improvement in function in the MCPJ-BO group, with a mean change of 12.7 (<em>p</em> = 0.0001). The overall success rates for the MCPJ-BO group and RME-O group were 60% and 27%, respectively. Patients in both groups had high satisfaction with the orthosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MCPJ-BO and RME-O could be used for pain relief in the treatment of TF. The MCPJ-BO appears to be more effective than the RME-O in improving function.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of trigger finger with metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis vs relative motion extension orthosis: A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2023.10.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>The metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis (MCPJ-BO) is one of the first-line </span>orthotic treatment for patients with trigger finger (TF). Relative motion extension orthosis (RME-O) has recently emerged as a treatment option for various hand disorders involving TF.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 6 weeks of orthotic treatment with the MCPJ-BO and the RME-O for pain relief. Function and satisfaction with the orthosis were assessed as secondary objectives.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Randomized clinical study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty patients with an average age of 50 years with Froimson stage 1-3 A1 pulley triggering participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the MCPJ-BO (<em>n</em> = 15; 10 females, five males) or the RME-O group (<em>n</em><span><span> = 15; 12 females, three males). The orthoses were worn full time for 6 weeks. All patients received patient education, activity modification, and flexor tendon gliding exercises as part of the rehabilitation program. Pre- and post-assessments included </span>Numeric Pain Rating Scale<span>, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to analyze the difference between the two groups.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no significant differences between the two groups in pain and function before treatment (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Within-group comparisons indicated that both orthoses relieved pain, but the MCPJ-BO group achieved greater pain relief (<em>p</em> = 0.001). There was a significant improvement in function in the MCPJ-BO group, with a mean change of 12.7 (<em>p</em> = 0.0001). The overall success rates for the MCPJ-BO group and RME-O group were 60% and 27%, respectively. Patients in both groups had high satisfaction with the orthosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MCPJ-BO and RME-O could be used for pain relief in the treatment of TF. The MCPJ-BO appears to be more effective than the RME-O in improving function.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001692\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景掌指关节阻滞矫形器(MCPJ-BO)是扳机指(TF)患者的一线矫形治疗方法之一。本研究的主要目的是比较掌指关节阻滞矫形器和相对运动伸展矫形器 6 周矫形治疗对缓解疼痛的效果。方法30名平均年龄为50岁的Froimson1-3期A1滑轮触发患者参加了研究。他们被随机分配到 MCPJ-BO 组(n = 15;10 名女性,5 名男性)或 RME-O 组(n = 15;12 名女性,3 名男性)。矫形器佩戴时间为 6 周。作为康复计划的一部分,所有患者都接受了患者教育、活动调整和屈肌腱滑动练习。治疗前和治疗后的评估包括数字疼痛评分量表、手臂、肩部和手部残疾问卷以及魁北克用户对辅助技术满意度评估问卷。结果两组患者在治疗前的疼痛和功能方面没有显著差异(p <0.05)。组内比较显示,两种矫形器都能缓解疼痛,但 MCPJ-BO 组的疼痛缓解程度更高(P = 0.001)。MCPJ-BO 组的功能明显改善,平均变化为 12.7(p = 0.0001)。MCPJ-BO组和RME-O组的总体成功率分别为60%和27%。结论MCPJ-BO和RME-O可用于治疗TF的疼痛缓解。在改善功能方面,MCPJ-BO似乎比RME-O更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment of trigger finger with metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis vs relative motion extension orthosis: A randomized clinical trial

Background

The metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis (MCPJ-BO) is one of the first-line orthotic treatment for patients with trigger finger (TF). Relative motion extension orthosis (RME-O) has recently emerged as a treatment option for various hand disorders involving TF.

Purpose

The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 6 weeks of orthotic treatment with the MCPJ-BO and the RME-O for pain relief. Function and satisfaction with the orthosis were assessed as secondary objectives.

Study design

Randomized clinical study.

Methods

Thirty patients with an average age of 50 years with Froimson stage 1-3 A1 pulley triggering participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the MCPJ-BO (n = 15; 10 females, five males) or the RME-O group (n = 15; 12 females, three males). The orthoses were worn full time for 6 weeks. All patients received patient education, activity modification, and flexor tendon gliding exercises as part of the rehabilitation program. Pre- and post-assessments included Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to analyze the difference between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups in pain and function before treatment (p < 0.05). Within-group comparisons indicated that both orthoses relieved pain, but the MCPJ-BO group achieved greater pain relief (p = 0.001). There was a significant improvement in function in the MCPJ-BO group, with a mean change of 12.7 (p = 0.0001). The overall success rates for the MCPJ-BO group and RME-O group were 60% and 27%, respectively. Patients in both groups had high satisfaction with the orthosis.

Conclusions

MCPJ-BO and RME-O could be used for pain relief in the treatment of TF. The MCPJ-BO appears to be more effective than the RME-O in improving function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Force control of pinch grip: Normative data of a holistic evaluation. Digital wound assessment by hand specialists is moderately reliable. Dorsal blocking orthoses for proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate injuries: A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of joint angle on patient outcomes. Understanding the implications of hand impairments in light of the International Classification of Function model. Virtual goniometric measurement of the forearm, wrist, and hand: A double-blind psychometric study of a digital goniometer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1